Cited by 284Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Treatment and Management

The impact of non-severe hypoglycemic events on work productivity and diabetes management

Open access
Brod, Meryl, Christensen, Torsten, Thomsen, Trine L., Bushnell, Donald M.·2011·Value in Health

Abstract

Objectives Hypoglycemia is a common complication of treatment with certain diabetes drugs. Non-severe hypoglycemic events (NSHEs) occur more frequently than severe events and account for the majority of total events. The objective of this multi-country study was to identify how NSHEs in a working population affect productivity, costs, and self-management behaviors.Methods A 20-minute survey assessing the impact of NSHEs was administered via the Internet to individuals (≥ 18 years of age) with self-reported diabetes in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and France. The analysis sample consisted of all respondents who reported an NSHE in the past month. Topics included: reasons for, duration of, and impact of NSHE(s) on productivity and diabetes self-management.Results A total of 1404 respondents were included in this analysis. Lost productivity was estimated to range from $15.26 to $93.47 (USD) per NSHE, representing 8.3 to 15.9 hours of lost work time per month. Among individuals reporting an NSHE at work (n = 972), 18.3% missed work for an average of 9.9 hours (SD 8.4). Among respondents experiencing an NSHE outside working hours (including nocturnal), 22.7% arrived late for work or missed a full day. Productivity loss was highest for NSHEs occurring during sleep, with an average of 14.7 (SD 11.6) working hours lost. In the week following the NSHE, respondents required an average of 5.6 extra blood glucose test strips. Among respondents using insulin, 25% decreased their insulin dose following the NSHE.Conclusions NSHEs are associated with substantial economic consequences for employers and patients. Greater attention to treatments that reduce NSHEs could have a major, positive impact on lost work productivity and overall diabetes management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jval.2011.02.001

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relationships between time in target range and number of severe and non-severe hypoglycemic events have been observed.

    “Relationships between time in target range and A1C (25; 26) and number of severe and non-severe hypoglycemic events (27-31) have also been observed.”

    From Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range (2019) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Introduction distinguishes severe from non-severe hypoglycemic events, and the results report frequencies of non-severe events. Neither those passages nor the passages retrieved for “time in target range” and “time in range” address a relationship between time in target range and the number of either type of event. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brod, M., Christensen, T., Thomsen, T. L., & Bushnell, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Brod Group (US)
  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
Corresponding author
Brod, Meryl
Venue
Value in Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
665-671
ISSN
1098-3015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117304511
Cited by
284
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 18
FWCI
24.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Value in Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Novo Nordisk
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
labor productivity, diabetes self-management, missed work, nocturnal hypoglycemia, blood glucose monitoring, insulin dose reduction, economic burden
MeSH terms
Absenteeism, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Efficiency, Employment, Europe, Female, Health Services Research, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reagent Strips, Salaries and Fringe Benefits, Self Care, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, United States, Chi-Square Distribution, Cost of Illness, Models, Economic, Health Care Surveys, Internet, Gross Domestic Product

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review