Cited by 1Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeDiabetes Management and Education

Cost-effectiveness of a short message service (Sms) intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes among adults with impaired glucose tolerance

Open access
Wong, C.K.H., Jiao, F.F., Siu, S.C., Fung, C.S.C., Wong, K.W., Lam, C.L.K.·2014·Value in Health

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.716

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wong, C. K. H., Jiao, F. F., Siu, S. C., Fung, C. S. C., Wong, K. W., & Lam, C. L. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Tung Wah Eastern Hospital (CN)
Venue
Value in Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
17
Issue
7
Pages
A348
ISSN
1098-3015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995209482
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Value in Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
cost-effectiveness, short message service, text messaging intervention, type 2 diabetes prevention, impaired glucose tolerance, diabetes prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review