PMU106 EVALUATING THE ABILITY OF A MOBILE MEDICATION APP TO IMPROVE ADHERENCE IN A CHRONICALLY NON-ADHERENT POPULATION IN HYPERTENSION, DIABETES AND DEPRESSION
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The availability of digital health platforms and online health communities may facilitate cocreation by encouraging transparent communication with patients, improving health literacy, providing informational and social support to patients, and empowering patient self-management.
“The availability of digital health platforms and online health communities may facilitate cocreation by encouraging transparent communication with patients, improving health literacy (in patients and healthcare organizations), providing informational and social support to patients, and empowering patient self-management.”
From Digital health technologies and major depressive disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [159]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital health technologies and major depressive disorder
McIntyre, R. S., Greenleaf, W., Bulaj, G., Taylor, S. T., Mitsi, G., Saliu, D., Czysz, A., Silvesti, G., Garcia, M., & Jain, R. (2023) · CNS Spectrums · doi:10.1017/s1092852923002225 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“…treatments 88,89 ; Medisafe is an app that provides reminders and alerts for users to take their prescriptions, thus improving treatment adherence 83,90 ; and Innerworld is a social VR platform that can help patients with depression set and reach mental health goals and promote treatment adherence.”
Background
- Authors
- McGuiness, C. B., Michaeli, J., Wang, X., & Wade, R. L.
- Affiliations
- IQVIA (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Value in Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 22
- Pages
- S268
- ISSN
- 1098-3015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2955515843
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Value in Health (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
- Keywords
- medication adherence, medication possession ratio, treatment persistence, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, medication alerts, chronic disease management, prescription claims data, matched cohort
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review