PNS217 bootstrap saturation: a quantitative approach for supporting data saturation in sample sizes in qualitative research'
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Data saturation was determined on the basis there was a repetition of concepts and interviews offered no new information.
“Data saturation was determined on the basis there was a repetition of concepts and interviews offered no new information (Gugiu et al., 2020).”
From Stranger in a mask” midwives’ experiences of providing perinatal bereavement care to parents during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ireland: a qualitative descriptive study (2022) · cites this paper as Gugiu et al., 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2024) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069241229777 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
“Lowe et al. (2018) propose a quantitative approach to measure when thematic development ceases, LaDonna et al. (2021) venture beyond saturation to probe the rigor in qualitative interviews, and Gugiu et al. (2020) introduce a method for supporting data saturation decisions concerning sample sizes.”
Power, A., Atkinson, S., & Noonan, M. (2022) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2022.103356 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Multidimensional scale of meaningful work: construction and validation
Batuchina, A., Iždonaitė-Medžiūnienė, I., & Lecaj, R. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1578825 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Disposition of improving quality of life in older adults: the case of Lithuania
Iždonaitė-Medžiūnienė, I., & Preikšaitienė, L. (2024) · Aging Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1007/s40520-023-02687-2 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Gugiu et al. [20] found that out of 15 concepts identified as most important in their qualitative research, 90% of them emerged with an n = 8 research sample, and 100% with an n = 14 sample.”
BackgroundDavis, P., & Needham, C. R. (2023) · Open Journal of Business and Management · doi:10.4236/ojbm.2023.115147 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
O’Farrell, A., Chatzi, A. V., & Doody, O. (2023) · International journal of infection control · doi:10.3396/ijic.v19.23085 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Otuu, O. O., & Aguboshim, F. C. (2023) · IEEE International Humanitarian Technology Conference (IHTC) · doi:10.1109/ihtc58960.2023.10508850 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Riada, B. N., & Noonan, M. (2025) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2025.104441 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gugiu, C., Randall, J., Gibbons, E., Hunter, T., Naegeli, A., & Symonds, T.
- Affiliations
- Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Value in Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 23
- Pages
- S677
- ISSN
- 1098-3015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3110707396
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Value in Health (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Keywords
- data saturation, bootstrapping, sample size determination, qualitative research, concept identification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
