The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Work-to-family conflict, positive spillover, and boundary management: a person-environment fit approach
Open accessAbstract
This study adopted a person-environment fit approach to examine whether greater congruence between employees’ preferences for segmenting their work domain from their family domain (i.e., keeping work matters at work) and what their employers’ work environment allowed would be associated with lower work-to-family conflict and higher work-to-family positive spillover. Different facets of work-to-family conflict (time-based and strain-based) and positive spillover (affective and instrumental) were examined. According to latent congruence modeling of survey data from 528 management employees, congruence was negatively related to both time-based and strain-based work-to-family conflict and positively related to work-to-family instrumental positive spillover as expected. However, contrary to expectations, congruence was negatively related to work-to-family affective positive spillover. Implications for how boundary management processes may affect both positive and negative experiences of the work–family interface are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267 · Cited by 11,507
When Work and Family are Allies: A Theory of Work-Family Enrichment
Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.19379625 · Cited by 3,837
Self-citationAll in a Day's Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259305 · Cited by 3,039
Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity.
Shalley, C. E. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.179 · Cited by 632
Cited by
Shockley, K. M., Shen, W., DeNunzio, M. M., Arvan, M. L., & Knudsen, E. A. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000246 · Cited by 451
Boundary management and work-nonwork balance while working from home
Allen, T. D., Merlo, K., Lawrence, R. C., Slutsky, J., & Gray, C. E. (2021) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12300 · Cited by 370
Wepfer, A. G., Allen, T. D., Brauchli, R., Jenny, G. J., & Bauer, G. F. (2018) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-017-9520-y · Cited by 172
Delanoeije, J., & Verbruggen, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02362 · Cited by 57
Day, A., Barber, L. K., & Tonet, J. (2019) · The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior · doi:10.1017/9781108649636.022 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Z., Powell, G. N., & Greenhaus, J. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Vocational Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 82-93
- ISSN
- 0001-8791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089725924
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 22.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Work-to-family conflict, positive spillover, and boundary management: a person-environment fit approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.10.009
- The paper
- Chen, Z., Powell, G. N., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2009). Work-to-family conflict, positive spillover, and boundary management: a person-environment fit approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.10.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
