The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effectiveness of career choice interventions: A meta-analytic replication and extension
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027 · Cited by 7,715
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research
Rosenthal, R. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412984997 · Cited by 4,635
The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
(2019) · doi:10.7758/9781610448864 · Cited by 4,553
Fixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis.
Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.486 · Cited by 2,977
Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses
Deeks, J. J., Higgins, J. P., Altman, D. G., & on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group (2019) · Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions · doi:10.1002/9781119536604.ch10 · Cited by 2,672 · cited 1×
“It should be noted, however, that Deeks, Higgins, and Altman (2011) contended that the Q-test is an imperfect measure of homogeneity.”
BackgroundSavickas, M. L., & Porfeli, E. J. (2012) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.011 · Cited by 2,397 · cited 8×
“, Brown & Ryan Krane, 2000; Oliver & Spokane, 1988; Spokane & Oliver, 1983; Ryan, 1999; Whiston, Sexton, & Lasoff, 1998). Oliver and Spokane (1988) extended the meta-analysis conducted by Spokane and Oliver (1983) and included studies published from 1950 through 1982 and found an average effect size of 0.82 using the…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAnalysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses
Deeks, J. J., Higgins, J. P., & Altman, D. G. (2008) · Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions · doi:10.1002/9780470712184.ch9 · Cited by 1,800
Field, A. P., & Gillett, R. (2010) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1348/000711010x502733 · Cited by 1,162
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2000) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00156 · Cited by 833 · cited 1×
“As a result, if the population parameters are actually different across studies, then the probability of a making Type I error can increase beyond the accepted alpha value of 0.05 (Hunter & Schmidt, 2000).”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Issues and Implications for Career Research and Practice
Hirschi, A. (2018) · The Career Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/cdq.12142 · Cited by 466
Metadata
- Authors
- Whiston, S. C., Li, Y., Goodrich Mitts, N., & Wright, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Vocational Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 100
- Pages
- 175-184
- ISSN
- 0001-8791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2602024193
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 45.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effectiveness of career choice interventions: A meta-analytic replication and extension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.03.010
- The paper
- Whiston, S. C., Li, Y., Goodrich Mitts, N., & Wright, L. (2017). Effectiveness of career choice interventions: A meta-analytic replication and extension. Journal of Vocational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.03.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
