Cited by 2,397Career Development and DiversityPsychometric Methodologies and TestingHigher Education and Employability

Career adapt-abilities scale: construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries

Savickas, Mark L., Porfeli, Erik J.·2012·Journal of Vocational Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.011

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Savickas, M. L., & Porfeli, E. J.
Affiliations
Northeast Ohio Medical University (US)
Corresponding author
Savickas, Mark L.
Venue
Journal of Vocational Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
80
Issue
3
Pages
661-673
ISSN
0001-8791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000513500
Cited by
2,397
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 281 · 2025: 250 · 2024: 235 · 2023: 250 · 2022: 262 · 2021: 216 · 2020: 189 · 2019: 191 · 2018: 144 · 2017: 101 · 2016: 80 · 2015: 85 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 16
FWCI
164.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Vocational Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
Keywords
Career Adapt-Abilities Scale, career adaptability, scale development, measurement invariance, cross-cultural equivalence, psychosocial resources, concern, control, curiosity, confidence, occupational transitions, reliability statistics, internal consistency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review