Cited by 6Rabies epidemiology and controlBacterial Infections and VaccinesVirology and Viral Diseases

Study on immune persistence of the CTN-1V strain rabies vaccine in humans

Open access
Wang, Lidong, Li, Jia, Mu, Qiuyue, Zhu, Lei, Wang, Yunpeng, Sheng, Ying, Zhao, Danhua, Yang, Guoling +3 more·2024·Journal of Virus Eradication

Abstract

This study is a single-arm, single-center phase IV clinical trial on a rabies vaccine that has been marketed in China. The Vero cells and CTN-1V strain are used in the rabies vaccine product. The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety, immunogenicity and immune persistence of this product. One hundred and forty-nine participants were enrolled to the study, all of whom were included in the safety analysis set (SS), among which 116 participants were included in the protocol analysis set (PPS), One hundred and fifteen participants were included in the 6-month immune persistence analysis set (IPS6) and 111 in the 12-month immune persistence analysis set IPS12. Results showed that: 1) In the SS analysis set, adverse reactions were mainly pyrexia and pain at the vaccination site, the severity of which were mostly grade 1, and concentrated in 0-3 days after vaccination. No grade 3 or above adverse events and serious adverse events (SAE) related to the experimental vaccine were observed. 2) In the PPS analysis set, the antibody positive conversion rate reached 100% at 14 days after full immunization of the pre-immunized negative population; The antibody geometric mean titer (GMT) (95% CI) was 14.82 (13.00, 16.90). 3) The positive rate of serum neutralizing antibody was 93.91 % and the GMT at 1.58 IU/ml at 6 months after full immunization. The positive rate of neutralizing antibody was 85.59 % and GMT at 1.30 IU/ml at 12 months after immunization. Our results show that the human rabies vaccine with the CTN-1V strain and Vero cells as matrix had good safety, immunogenicity and immune persistence in our study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jve.2024.100365

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Longitudinal clinical data revealed that the CTN-1 vaccine is safe and effective, making it suitable for rabies prevention and control in China.

    “longitudinal clinical data revealed that the vaccine is safe and effective, making it suitable for rabies prevention and control in China [18,21,22,23].”

    From Evaluation of the Efficacy of the Vaccine Production Process in Removing Residual Host Cell DNA from the Vero Cell Rabies Vaccine (2024) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Abstract (page not provided) reports good safety, immunogenicity, and antibody persistence for the CTN-1V vaccine in a longitudinal clinical trial in China. The study did not measure prevention of rabies, so its findings do not establish clinical effectiveness or the broader conclusion that the vaccine is suitable for rabies prevention and control in China. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [4]World Health Organization Rabies vaccines: WHO position paper, April 2018 - recommendations Wkly Epidemiol Rec No. 49/50 82 2007 425 436 30107991
  2. [6]World Health Organization Annex 2 Recommendations for Inactivated Rabies Vaccine for Human Use Produced in Cell Substrates and Embryonated Eggs vol. 41 2007 WHO Technical Report Series 95 96
  3. [7]Shi L.T. Li Y.Y. Application and research progress of Rabies virus CTN-1 strain in human Rabies vaccine Chinese Journal of Biological Products 34 11 2021 1375 1381

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, L., Li, J., Mu, Q., Zhu, L., Wang, Y., Sheng, Y., Zhao, D., Yang, G., Yu, X., Wu, X., & Miao, L.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (CN)
  • Guizhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Yu, Xiaoqing
  • Wu, Xiaohong
Venue
Journal of Virus Eradication
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
100365
ISSN
2055-6640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392518902
Cited by
4
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Virus Eradication (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Rabies epidemiology and control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
Keywords
rabies vaccine, Vero cells, immune persistence, vaccine safety, immunogenicity, neutralizing antibodies, antibody geometric mean titer, adverse events, post-marketing surveillance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review