The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Volcanic ash-leachates: a review and recommendations for sampling methods
Open accessAbstract
Tephra in plumes can scavenge and thereby rapidly deposit volatiles including sulphur, halogen and metal species. These may then be leached (e.g. by rainfall), potentially releasing heavy loadings to soils and water bodies. Several eruptions have resulted in contamination of pasture, sometimes with serious impacts on livestock. Water quality has also been an issue in some areas affected by tephra fall. This work synthesises the literature on volcanic ash-leachates and considers the controls on volatile adsorption. General trends emerge for basaltic, intermediate and silicic tephra, as well as for variable particle size and transport distance. The applications of ash-leachate data to plume-gas geochemistry, calculation of volatile budgets and environmental impact assessment are evaluated. Comparisons for different eruptions are hampered by disparities in leachate analysis techniques. A standardised methodology is therefore proposed to facilitate future health impact assessment and volcanological interpretation of results from different sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oelkers, E. H., & Gislason, S. R. (2001) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0016-7037(01)00664-0 · Cited by 498
Horwell, C. J., Fenoglio, I., Vala Ragnarsdottir, K., Sparks, R. S. J., & Fubini, B. (2003) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/s0013-9351(03)00044-6 · Cited by 101
Self-citation
Cited by
Principles of fluoride toxicity and the cellular response: a review
Johnston, N. R., & Strobel, S. A. (2020) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-020-02687-5 · Cited by 356
Fluorine in the environment, a review of its sources and geochemistry
Fuge, R. (2019) · Applied Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.12.016 · Cited by 236
Grain size analysis of volcanic ash for the rapid assessment of respiratory health hazard
Horwell, C. J. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Monitoring · doi:10.1039/b710583p · Cited by 145
Self-citationBadertscher, S., Borsato, A., Frisia, S., Cheng, H., Edwards, R. L., Tüysüz, O., & Fleitmann, D. (2014) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2014.01.041 · Cited by 66
Monick, M. M., Baltrusaitis, J., Powers, L. S., Borcherding, J. A., Caraballo, J. C., Mudunkotuwa, I., Peate, D. W., Walters, K., Thompson, J. M., Grassian, V. H., et al. (2013) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1206004 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Witham, C. S., Oppenheimer, C., & Horwell, C. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 299-326
- ISSN
- 0377-0273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139252690
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Volcanic ash-leachates: a review and recommendations for sampling methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2004.11.010
- The paper
- Witham, C. S., Oppenheimer, C., & Horwell, C. J. (2005). Volcanic ash-leachates: a review and recommendations for sampling methods. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2004.11.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
