Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 339

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Decellularized vein as a potential scaffold for vascular tissue engineering

Open access
Schaner, Patrick J, Martin, Niels D, Tulenko, Thomas N, Shapiro, Irving M, Tarola, Nicholas A, Leichter, Rhoda F, Carabasi, R.Anthony, DiMuzio, Paul J·2004·Journal of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

PURPOSE Current strategies to create small-diameter vascular grafts involve seeding biocompatible, compliant scaffolds with autologous vascular cells. Our purpose was to study the composition and strength of decellularized vein to determine its potential as a vascular tissue-engineering scaffold. METHODS Intact human greater saphenous vein specimens were decellularized by using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). Residual cellular and extracellular matrix composition was studied with light and electron microscopy as well as immunohistochemistry. Burst and suture-holding strength was measured in vitro by insufflation and pull-through techniques. To assess initial handling and durability of decellularized vein in vivo, a canine model was developed wherein decellularized canine jugular veins were implanted as carotid interposition grafts in recipient animals. After two weeks of arterial perfusion, these grafts were studied with duplex imaging and histologic methods. RESULTS Human saphenous vein decellularized by using SDS was devoid of endothelial cells and >94% of the cells resident within the vein wall. Collagen morphology appeared unchanged, and elastin staining decreased only slightly. Basement membrane collagen type IV remained intact. Compared with fresh vein, decellularized vein had similar in vitro burst (2480 +/- 460 mm Hg vs 2380 +/- 620 mm Hg; P >.05) and suture-holding (185 +/- 30 gm vs 178 +/- 66 gm; P >.05) strength. Decellularized canine vein functioned well in vivo without dilation, anastomotic complication, or rupture over 2 weeks of arterial perfusion. CONCLUSIONS Vein rendered acellular with SDS has well-preserved extracellular matrix, basement membrane structure, and strength sufficient for vascular grafting. These properties suggest proof of concept for its use as a scaffold for further vascular tissue engineering. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The following research examines the creation of a new small-diameter bypass graft. It is clinically relevant to patients who need distal arterial bypass, coronary artery bypass, or hemodialysis access, but who do not have adequate autologous vein for their surgeries. Future investigations will involve further tissue engineering of this vascular scaffold (eg, autologous endothelial seeding of its lumen) and testing the clinical usefulness of the completed graft.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.03.033

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 339

Metadata

Authors
Schaner, P. J., Martin, N. D., Tulenko, T. N., Shapiro, I. M., Tarola, N. A., Leichter, R. F., Carabasi, R. A., & DiMuzio, P. J.
Venue
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-07
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
146-153
ISSN
0741-5214 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171890040
Cited by
339
References
0
FWCI
12.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decellularized vein as a potential scaffold for vascular tissue engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jvs.2004.03.033
The paper
Schaner, P. J., Martin, N. D., Tulenko, T. N., Shapiro, I. M., Tarola, N. A., Leichter, R. F., Carabasi, R. A., & DiMuzio, P. J. (2004). Decellularized vein as a potential scaffold for vascular tissue engineering. Journal of Vascular Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2004.03.033

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.