The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors leading to the discard of deceased donor kidneys in the United States
Open accessAbstract
The proportion of deceased donor kidneys procured for transplant but subsequently discarded has been growing steadily in the United States but factors contributing to the rising discard rate remain unclear. To assess the reasons for and probability of organ discard we assembled a cohort of 212,305 deceased donor kidneys recovered for transplant from 2000-2015 in the SRTR registry that included 36,700 kidneys that were discarded. ‘Biopsy Findings’ (38.2%) was the most commonly reported reason for discard. The median Kidney Donor Risk Index of discarded kidneys was significantly higher than transplanted organs (1.78 vs 1.12), but a large overlap in the quality of discarded and transplanted kidneys was observed. Kidneys of donors who were older, female, Black, obese, diabetic, hypertensive or HCV positive experienced a significantly increased odds of discard. Kidneys from donors with multiple unfavorable characteristics were more likely to be discarded while unilaterally discarded kidneys had the most desirable donor characteristics and the recipients of their partner kidneys experienced a one-year death censored graft survival rate over 90%. There was considerable geographic variation in the odds of discard across the United States which further supports the notion that factors beyond organ quality contributed to kidney discard. Thus, while the discard of a small fraction of organs procured from donors may be inevitable, the discard of potentially transplantable kidneys needs to be avoided. This will require a better understanding of the factors contributing to organ discard in order to remove the disincentives to utilize less than ideal organs for transplantation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wolfe, R. A., Ashby, V. B., Milford, E. L., Ojo, A. O., Ettenger, R. E., Agodoa, L. Y. C., Held, P. J., & Port, F. K. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199912023412303 · Cited by 5,371
A Comprehensive Risk Quantification Score for Deceased Donor Kidneys: The Kidney Donor Risk Index
Rao, P. S., Schaubel, D. E., Guidinger, M. K., Andreoni, K. A., Wolfe, R. A., Merion, R. M., Port, F. K., & Sung, R. S. (2009) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/tp.0b013e3181ac620b · Cited by 1,079
Deceased-Donor Characteristics and the Survival Benefit of Kidney Transplantation
Merion, R. M. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.21.2726 · Cited by 739
Organ Donation and Utilization in the United States, 1996–2005
Punch, J. D., Hayes, D. H., LaPorte, F. B., McBride, V., & Seely, M. S. (2007) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01779.x · Cited by 600
OPTN/SRTR 2012 Annual Data Report: Kidney
Matas, A. J., Smith, J. M., Skeans, M. A., Thompson, B., Gustafson, S. K., Schnitzler, M. A., Stewart, D. E., Cherikh, W. S., Wainright, J. L., Snyder, J. J., et al. (2014) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/ajt.12579 · Cited by 376
OPTN/SRTR 2011 Annual Data Report: Kidney
Matas, A. J., Smith, J. M., Skeans, M. A., Lamb, K. E., Gustafson, S. K., Samana, C. J., Stewart, D. E., Snyder, J. J., Israni, A. K., & Kasiske, B. L. (2013) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/ajt.12019 · Cited by 308
Schold, J. D., & Meier-Kriesche, H.-U. (2006) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.01130905 · Cited by 189
The Donor Kidney Biopsy and Its Implications in Predicting Graft Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Wang, C. J., Wetmore, J. B., Crary, G. S., & Kasiske, B. L. (2015) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/ajt.13213 · Cited by 175
The reproducibility and predictive value on outcome of renal biopsies from expanded criteria donors
Antonieta Azancot, M., Moreso, F., Salcedo, M., Cantarell, C., Perello, M., Torres, I. B., Montero, A., Trilla, E., Sellarés, J., Morote, J., et al. (2014) · Kidney International · doi:10.1038/ki.2013.461 · Cited by 167
Diagnosing the Decades-Long Rise in the Deceased Donor Kidney Discard Rate in the United States
Stewart, D. E., Garcia, V. C., Rosendale, J. D., Klassen, D. K., & Carrico, B. (2016) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/tp.0000000000001539 · Cited by 155
Cited by
Comparison of organ donation and transplantation rates between opt-out and opt-in systems
Arshad, A., Anderson, B., & Sharif, A. (2019) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2019.01.036 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohan, S., Chiles, M. C., Patzer, R. E., Pastan, S. O., Husain, S. A., Carpenter, D. J., Dube, G. K., Crew, R. J., Ratner, L. E., & Cohen, D. J.
- Venue
- Kidney International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 187-198
- ISSN
- 0085-2538 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2801081005
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 22.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors leading to the discard of deceased donor kidneys in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.kint.2018.02.016
- The paper
- Mohan, S., Chiles, M. C., Patzer, R. E., Pastan, S. O., Husain, S. A., Carpenter, D. J., Dube, G. K., Crew, R. J., Ratner, L. E., & Cohen, D. J. (2018). Factors leading to the discard of deceased donor kidneys in the United States. Kidney International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2018.02.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.