The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Donor Kidney Biopsy and Its Implications in Predicting Graft Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
Despite a growing organ shortage in the United States, many deceased donor kidneys removed for transplantation are discarded. Kidney biopsy findings often play a role in these discards, although it is not clear whether biopsies reliably inform acceptance decisions. Therefore, we carried out a systematic review of the medical literature on the utility of both procurement and implantation biopsies for predicting posttransplant outcomes. Between January 1, 1994 and July 1, 2014, 47 studies were published in the English language literature that examined the association between pretransplant donor biopsy findings from 50 or more donors (with more than half being from deceased donors) and either posttransplant graft failure, delayed graft function, or graft function. In general, study quality was poor. All were retrospective or did not indicate if they were prospective. Results were heterogeneous, with authors as often as not concluding that biopsy results did not predict posttransplant outcomes. The percent glomerular sclerosis was most often examined, and failed to predict graft failure in 7 of 14 studies. Of 15 semiquantitative scoring systems proposed, none consistently predicted posttransplant outcomes across studies. Routine use of biopsies to help determine whether or not to transplant a kidney should be reexamined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Markers of cellular senescence in zero hour biopsies predict outcome in renal transplantation
Koppelstaetter, C., Schratzberger, G., Perco, P., Hofer, J., Mark, W., Öllinger, R., Oberbauer, R., Schwarz, C., Mitterbauer, C., Kainz, A., et al. (2008) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00398.x · Cited by 124
Cited by
Factors leading to the discard of deceased donor kidneys in the United States
Mohan, S., Chiles, M. C., Patzer, R. E., Pastan, S. O., Husain, S. A., Carpenter, D. J., Dube, G. K., Crew, R. J., Ratner, L. E., & Cohen, D. J. (2018) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2018.02.016 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, C. J., Wetmore, J. B., Crary, G. S., & Kasiske, B. L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Transplantation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1903-1914
- ISSN
- 1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1951968743
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Donor Kidney Biopsy and Its Implications in Predicting Graft Outcomes: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ajt.13213
- The paper
- Wang, C. J., Wetmore, J. B., Crary, G. S., & Kasiske, B. L. (2015). The Donor Kidney Biopsy and Its Implications in Predicting Graft Outcomes: A Systematic Review. American Journal of Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.13213
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.