The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ANN vs. SVM: Which one performs better in classification of MCCs in mammogram imaging
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SMOTE synthetic minority over-sampling technique
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.953 · Cited by 32,865
THE DIGITAL DATABASE FOR SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY
Heath, M. D., Bowyer, K. W., Kopans, D. B., & Moore, R. M. (2007) · Cited by 1,017
SVMs Modeling for Highly Imbalanced Classification
Tang, Y., Zhang, Y.-Q., Chawla, N. V., & Krasser, S. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics) · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2008.2002909 · Cited by 966
Handling imbalanced datasets: A review
Kotsiantis, S. B., Kanellopoulos, D. N., & Pintelas, P. (2006) · Cited by 920
Current Status of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography
Heath, M., Bowyer, K., Kopans, D., Kegelmeyer, P., Moore, R., Chang, K., & Munishkumaran, S. (1998) · Computational Imaging and Vision · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-5318-8_75 · Cited by 787
Experimental perspectives on learning from imbalanced data
Van Hulse, J., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., & Napolitano, A. (2007) · Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning · doi:10.1145/1273496.1273614 · Cited by 786
A support vector machine approach for detection of microcalcifications
El-Naqa, I., Yang, Y., Wernick, M. N., Galatsanos, N. P., & Nishikawa, R. M. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2002.806569 · Cited by 571
Computer-aided detection and classification of microcalcifications in mammograms: a survey
Cheng, H. D., Cai, X., Chen, X., Hu, L., & Lou, X. (2003) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/s0031-3203(03)00192-4 · Cited by 563
Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms
Cheng, H. D., Shi, X. J., Min, R., Hu, L. M., Cai, X. P., & Du, H. N. (2006) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2005.07.006 · Cited by 538
On the effectiveness of preprocessing methods when dealing with different levels of class imbalance
García, V., Sánchez, J. S., & Mollineda, R. A. (2012) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2011.06.013 · Cited by 356
Cited by
Giri, D., Rajendra Acharya, U., Martis, R. J., Vinitha Sree, S., Lim, T.-C., Ahamed, T., & Suri, J. S. (2013) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2012.08.011 · Cited by 221
Khandakar, A., Chowdhury, M. E. H., Reaz, M. B. I., Ali, S. H. M., Kiranyaz, S., Rahman, T., Chowdhury, M. H., Ayari, M. A., Alfkey, R., Bakar, A. A. A., et al. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22114249 · Cited by 74
Higher-order spectral analysis of spontaneous speech signals in Alzheimer’s disease
Nasrolahzadeh, M., Mohammadpoory, Z., & Haddadnia, J. (2018) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-018-9499-8 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Ren, J.
- Venue
- Knowledge-Based Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 26
- Pages
- 144-153
- ISSN
- 0950-7051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025025456
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 13.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ANN vs. SVM: Which one performs better in classification of MCCs in mammogram imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.knosys.2011.07.016
- The paper
- Ren, J. (2012). ANN vs. SVM: Which one performs better in classification of MCCs in mammogram imaging. Knowledge-Based Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2011.07.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.