The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A collaborative filtering approach to mitigate the new user cold start problem
Open accessAbstract
The new user cold start issue represents a serious problem in recommender systems as it can lead to the loss of new users who decide to stop using the system due to the lack of accuracy in the recommendations received in that first stage in which they have not yet cast a significant number of votes with which to feed the recommender system's collaborative filtering core. For this reason it is particularly important to design new similarity metrics which provide greater precision in the results offered to users who have cast few votes. This paper presents a new similarity measure perfected using optimization based on neural learning, which exceeds the best results obtained with current metrics. The metric has been tested on the Netflix and Movielens databases, obtaining important improvements in the measures of accuracy, precision and recall when applied to new user cold start situations. The paper includes the mathematical formalization describing how to obtain the main quality measures of a recommender system using leave-one-out cross validation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WIDROW, B., & HOFF, M. E. (1960) · doi:10.21236/ad0241531 · Cited by 4,009
Cited by
Pliakos, K., Joo, S.-H., Park, J. Y., Cornillie, F., Vens, C., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.009 · Cited by 149
Understanding Human Intelligence through Human Limitations
Griffiths, T. L. (2020) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.09.001 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Bobadilla, J., Ortega, F., Hernando, A., & Bernal, J.
- Venue
- Knowledge-Based Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 26
- Pages
- 225-238
- ISSN
- 0950-7051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031305127
- Cited by
- 492
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 41.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.