The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How to take advantage of behavioral features for the early detection of grooming in online conversations
Abstract
Detecting grooming behavior in online conversations has become a growing problem due to the large number of messaging platforms that children and young people use nowadays. The biggest drawback is the lack of tools focused on the automatic prevention of this risk. This paper proposes seven Behavioral Features (BFs) to be used for early grooming detection. A detailed study is conducted to understand the background that allows these features to contribute to tasks of early classification. Besides, we introduce the Behavioral Feature - Profile Specific Representation (BF-PSR) framework as an extension of the well-known Profile Specific Representation (PSR) framework to properly employ the proposed behavioral features. Experimental results reveal that our proposal outperforms all the concurrent methods and obtains state-of-the-art performance in the area of early grooming detection. Specifically, the new BF-PSR framework achieves a gain of more than 40% in effectiveness over five competitors when only 10% of the SGD conversations content is available, thus it shows a substantial advantage to allow the early detection of grooming; besides, it maintains a similar gain in effectiveness as more data arrives. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to employ behavioral features for the early detection of grooming. On the other hand, we have assembled two new datasets called PJZ and PJZC to mitigate the lack of data in the grooming detection area. Both sets are publicly available for download aimed at fostering further researches. Additional experiments reveal that our BF-PSR framework outperforms all state-of-the-art methods when processing these new datasets.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most prior work has focused on detecting perpetrators' behaviors, leaving a limited understanding of how teens might respond to unwanted advances.
“Yet, most prior work has focused on detecting perpetrators' behaviors, leaving a limited understanding of how teens might respond to such unwanted advances.”
From From Vulnerable to Resilient: Examining Parent and Teen Perceptions on How to Respond to Unwanted Cybergrooming Advances (2026) · cites this paper as [59]
Most computer science literature focuses on detecting perpetrators' behaviors using machine learning and natural language processing techniques.
“To combat cybergrooming, researchers have developed numerous computational approaches, with most computer science literature focuses on detecting perpetrators' behaviors using machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP) techniques (e.g., [5, 16-19, 3234, 42, 44, 48, 59, 62, 72, 76-78]).”
From From Vulnerable to Resilient: Examining Parent and Teen Perceptions on How to Respond to Unwanted Cybergrooming Advances (2026) · cites this paper as [59]
Citations
Cites
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533
Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems - Volume 1
Zoubin Ghahramani, A., Welling, M., Cortes, C., Lawrence, N. D., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2014) · Cited by 656
Burdisso, S., Errecalde, M. L., & Montes-y-Gómez, M. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.05.023 · Cited by 216
Learning to Identify Internet Sexual Predation
McGhee, I., Bayzick, J., Kontostathis, A., Edwards, L., McBride, A., & Jakubowski, E. (2011) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415150305 · Cited by 106
Early detection of cyberbullying on social media networks
López-Vizcaíno, M. F., Novoa, F. J., Carneiro, V., & Cacheda, F. (2021) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2021.01.006 · Cited by 100
Overview of the International Sexual Predator Identification Competition at PAN-2012.
Inches, G., & Crestani, F. (2012) · Cited by 93
Detecting predatory conversations in social media by deep convolutional neural networks
Ebrahimi, M., Suen, C. Y., & Ormandjieva, O. (2016) · Digital Investigation · doi:10.1016/j.diin.2016.07.001 · Cited by 78
Toward spotting the pedophile telling victim from predator in text chats
Pendar, N. (2007) · International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC 2007) · doi:10.1109/icsc.2007.32 · Cited by 77
Exploring high-level features for detecting cyberpedophilia
Bogdanova, D., Rosso, P., & Solorio, T. (2014) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2013.04.007 · Cited by 67
Analyzing Behavioral Features for Email Classification.
Martin, S., Nelson, B. A., Sewani, A., Chen, K., & Joseph, A. D. (2005) · Conference on Email and Anti-Spam · Cited by 57
2019 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems
(2017) · IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · doi:10.1109/mci.2017.2742877 · Cited by 55
(2013) · RiuNet (Universitat Politècnica de València) · Cited by 53
Bernardini, G., Camilli, S., Quagliarini, E., & D’Orazio, M. (2017) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.549 · Cited by 48
Early detection of deception and aggressiveness using profile-based representations
Escalante, H. J., Villatoro-Tello, E., Garza, S. E., López-Monroy, A. P., Montes-y-Gómez, M., & Villaseñor-Pineda, L. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.07.040 · Cited by 44
Grooming detection using fuzzy-rough feature selection and text classification
Zuo, Z., Li, J., Anderson, P., Yang, L., & Naik, N. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) · doi:10.1109/fuzz-ieee.2018.8491591 · Cited by 39
Ensemble Method for Sexual Predators Identification in Online Chats
Fauzi, M. A., & Bours, P. (2020) · 2020 8th International Workshop on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF) · doi:10.1109/iwbf49977.2020.9107945 · Cited by 34
Fraud Detection Model Based on Multi-Verse Features Extraction Approach for Smart City Applications
Sadiq, A. S., Faris, H., Al-Zoubi, A. M., Mirjalili, S., & Ghafoor, K. Z. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-815032-0.00017-2 · Cited by 32
Detection of Cyber Grooming in Online Conversation
Bours, P., & Kulsrud, H. (2019) · 2019 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS) · doi:10.1109/wifs47025.2019.9035090 · Cited by 27
Large-scale analysis of grooming in modern social networks
Lykousas, N., & Patsakis, C. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114808 · Cited by 26
Detecting sexual predators in chats using behavioral features and imbalanced learning
CARDEI, C., & REBEDEA, T. (2017) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324916000395 · Cited by 21
Lorenzo-Dus, N., & Kinzel, A. (2019) · Journal of Corpora and Discourse Studies · doi:10.18573/jcads.31 · Cited by 20
Detecting Early Signs of Cyberbullying in Social Media
Samghabadi, N. S., López-Monroy, A. P., & Solorio, T. (2020) · Cited by 18
Monakhov, S. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236832 · Cited by 16
Temporal Variation of Terms as Concept Space for Early Risk Prediction.
Errecalde, M. L., Villegas, M. P., Funez, D. G., Ucelay, M. J. G., & Cagnina, L. (2017) · CLEF (Working Notes) · Cited by 16
Villatoro-Tello, E., Juárez-González, A., Escalante, H. J., Montes-y-Gómez, M., & Villaseñor-Pineda, L. (2012) · Cited by 14
Early Text Classification Using Multi-Resolution Concept Representations
López-Monroy, A. P., Gonzalez, F. A., Montes, M., Escalante, H. J., & Solorio, T. (2018) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1110 · Cited by 13
Content-Based Technical Solution for Cyberstalking Detection
Asante, A., & Feng, X. (2021) · International Conference on Computer Communication and the Internet (ICCCI) · doi:10.1109/iccci51764.2021.9486770 · Cited by 12
Early text classification: a Naïve solution
Escalante, H. J., Montes-y-Gómez, M., Villaseñor-Pineda, L., & Errecalde, M. L. (2016) · Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis (WASSA) · doi:10.18653/v1/w16-0416 · Cited by 12
Analysing centralities for organisational role inference in online social networks
Sánchez, R., Bilbao-Jayo, A., Zulaika, U., & Almeida, A. (2020) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2020.104129 · Cited by 10
García, S. D. L. F., Haider, F., & Luz, S. F. (2020) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc44109.2020.9176305 · Cited by 8
Myers, W., Etchart, T., & Fulda, N. (2020) · International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART) · doi:10.5220/0008939900690078 · Cited by 7
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- C. Morris, G. Hirst, Identifying sexual predators by svm classification with lexical and behavioral features, in: Working Notes of the CLEF 2012 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, 2012.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, F., & Topalli, V. (2024) · American Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1007/s12103-022-09706-4 · Cited by 51
Online Child Sexual Grooming Discourse
Lorenzo-Dus, N., Evans, C. A., & Mullineux-Morgan, R. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009314626 · Cited by 29
Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190845193.001.0001 · Cited by 21
Early Detection and Prevention of Malicious User Behavior on Twitter Using Deep Learning Techniques
Sánchez, R., Zubiaga, A., & Almeida, A. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2024.3419171 · Cited by 18
Effectiveness of machine learning methods in detecting grooming: a systematic meta-analytic review
Bianchi, M. L., Castillo, N., Astudillo, C. A., & Ahumada-Méndez, F. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-83003-4 · Cited by 13
Turvey, J., McKay, D., Kaur, S. T., Castree, N., Chang, S., & Lim, M. S. C. (2024) · JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting · doi:10.2196/58684 · Cited by 7
Kim, S.-M., Lee, B., Maqsood, M., Moon, J., & Rho, S. (2025) · Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences · doi:10.32604/cmes.2025.061653 · Cited by 9
Comparing machine learning models with a focus on tone in grooming chat logs
Hamm, L., & McKeever, S. (2025) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2025.1591828 · Cited by 4
Online Child Grooming Detection: Challenges and Future Directions
Mylonas, N., Stylianou, N., Chatzakou, D., Spathi, T., Alevizos, S., Drandaki, A., Koufakis, A., Kalpakis, G., Tsikrika, T., & Vrochidis, S. (2024) · Security informatics and law enforcement · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-62083-6_19 · Cited by 4
Topic modeling approaches to counter online grooming
Lykousas, N., & Patsakis, C. (2022) · ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci) · doi:10.1145/3501247.3539507 · Cited by 2
Enhanced Online Grooming detection employing Context Determination and Message-Level Analysis
Street, J., Ihianle, I. K., Olajide, F., & Lotfi, A. (2025) · Intelligent Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.iswa.2025.200607 · Cited by 6
Zhang, X., Akter, M., An, H., Liu, M., Zhang, Q., Huang, L., Cho, J.-H., J. Wisniewski, P., & Lee, S. W. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790949
Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190845193.003.0009
Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190845193.003.0005
Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190845193.003.0008
Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190845193.003.0003 · Cited by 1
Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190845193.003.0007
Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190845193.002.0004
Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190845193.002.0005
Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190845193.003.0001
“You Are Like My Only Friend, Idc If You Are 12”
Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190845193.003.0004
“Let Them Starve, You Idiots!!! Why Feed VERMIN?”
Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190845193.003.0006
Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190845193.003.0002
Erkennung von Kindesmissbrauch in Medien
Steinebach, M. (2023) · Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD · doi:10.1007/s11623-023-1750-8
AI-Powered Deep Forensics for Identifying Child Exploiters and Online Predators in Social Networks
Lakshmi, M. S., Rachana, S., Umamaheswari, B., Omega, B., & Muskan, S. (2026) · International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems for Collaborative Intelligence (ICMSCI) · doi:10.1109/icmsci67830.2026.11469610
Half the Story - Early Cyber Grooming Detection Using Messages from One Participant
Bours, P., Jenssen, S., & Waasjø, S. F. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-29723-5_23
dos Santos, L. F., & Guedes, G. (2026) · Anais do Brazilian Workshop on Social Network Analysis and Mining (BraSNAM) · doi:10.5753/brasnam.2026.23676
Arabic Datasets for Online Child Safety: A Systematic Review
Omar, R., Fetjah, L., & Mohamed, E. (2026) · International Conference on Cybersecurity, Digital Forensics, and AI Applications (ICCSDFAI) · doi:10.1109/iccsdfai70505.2026.11647989
SCOPE: A Proof-of-Concept Framework for Measuring Alignment in Data-Scarce Cybergrooming Domains
Choi, J.-E., Fan, S., & Steinebach, M. (2026) · IEEE Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) · doi:10.1109/compsac69091.2026.00048
Jaeckel, L., Stickler, Q., & Labudde, D. (2026) · Information · doi:10.3390/info17090831
Metadata
- Authors
- Milon-Flores, D. F., & Cordeiro, R. L. F.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Cordeiro, Robson L.F.
- Venue
- Knowledge-Based Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-03
- Volume
- 240
- Pages
- 108017
- ISSN
- 0950-7051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4200478206
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 14
- FWCI
- 1.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Knowledge-Based Systems (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
- Keywords
- behavioral characteristics, early detection, online discourse, child online safety, chatbot conversations, limited training data, datasets
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review