Cited by 17Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceHistory and advancements in chemistry

GenSMILES: An enhanced validity conscious representation for inverse design of molecules

Bhadwal, Arun Singh, Kumar, Kamal, Kumar, Neeraj·2023·Knowledge-Based Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110429

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GenSMILES replaces paired symbols with single-token, position-aware representations.

    “To address these issues, GenSMILES5 proposes an alternative representation that replaces paired symbols with single-token, position-aware representations.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhadwal, A. S., Kumar, K., & Kumar, N.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Technology Uttarakhand (IN)
  • Chandigarh University (IN)
Corresponding author
Bhadwal, Arun Singh
Venue
Knowledge-Based Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-05
Volume
268
Pages
110429
ISSN
0950-7051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4324102210
Cited by
17
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Knowledge-Based Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › History and advancements in chemistry
Keywords
SMILES representation, inverse design, generative molecular design, chemical graph representation, derivation rules, chemical space exploration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review