Cited by 421Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis

Molecular generative model based on conditional variational autoencoder for de novo molecular design

Open access
Lim, Jaechang, Ryu, Seongok, Kim, Jin Woo, Kim, Woo Youn·2018·Journal of Cheminformatics

Abstract

We propose a molecular generative model based on the conditional variational autoencoder for de novo molecular design. It is specialized to control multiple molecular properties simultaneously by imposing them on a latent space. As a proof of concept, we demonstrate that it can be used to generate drug-like molecules with five target properties. We were also able to adjust a single property without changing the others and to manipulate it beyond the range of the dataset.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13321-018-0286-7

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conditional VAE applicability in drug design is constrained by inherent drawbacks such as sub-optimal performance on standard SMILES representations, the posterior collapse problem, and inefficient exploration of latent space.

    “While the conditional VAE has been previously documented in the literature34, its applicability in drug design is constrained by inherent drawbacks such as sub-optimal performance on standard SMILES representations, the posterior collapse problem, and inefficient exploration of latent space.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. [10]Kingma DP, Welling M (2013) Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv:1312.6114 · arXiv
  2. [12]Makhzani A, Shlens J, Jaitly N, Goodfellow I, Frey B (2015) Adversarial autoencoders. arXiv:1511.05644 · arXiv
  3. [13]Blaschke T, Olivecrona M, Engkvist O, Bajorath J, Chen H (2017) Application of generative autoencoder in de novo molecular design. arXiv:1711.07839 PMC5836887 29235269 · arXiv
  4. [15]Bjerrum EJ, Threlfall R (2017) Molecular generation with recurrent neural networks (RNNs). arXiv:1705.04612 · arXiv
  5. [20]Guimaraes GL, Sanchez-Lengeling B, Outeiral C, Farias PLC, Aspuru-Guzik A (2017) Objective-reinforced generative adversarial networks (ORGAN) for sequence generation models. arXiv:1705.10843 · arXiv
  6. [21]Jaques N, Gu S, Bahdanau D, Hernández-Lobato JM, Turner RE, Eck D (2016) Sequence tutor: conservative fine-tuning of sequence generation models with KL-control. arXiv:1611.02796 · arXiv
  7. [22]D.P Kingma, D.J Rezende, S Mohamed, M Welling, (2014) Semi-supervised learning with deep generative models, pp 1–9. arXiv:1406.5298 · arXiv
  8. [27]Kusner MJ, Paige B, Hernández-Lobato JM (2017) Grammar variational autoencoder. arXiv:1703.01925 · arXiv
  9. [28]Wang H, Wang J, Wang J, Zhao M, Zhang W, Zhang F, Xie X, Guo M (2017) GraphGAN: graph representation learning with generative adversarial nets. arXiv:1711.08267 · arXiv
  10. [29]You J, Ying R, Ren X, Hamilton WL, Leskovec J (2018) GraphRNN: a deep generative model for graphs. arXiv:1802.08773 · arXiv
  11. [30]W Jin, R Barzilay, T Jaakkola (2018) Junction tree variational autoencoder for molecular graph generation. arXiv:1802.04364 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lim, J., Ryu, S., Kim, J. W., & Kim, W. Y.
Affiliations
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Kim, Jin Woo
  • Kim, Woo Youn
Venue
Journal of Cheminformatics
Published
2018-07-11
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
31-31
ISSN
1758-2946 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2808177712
Cited by
421
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
24.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cheminformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Figshare (cc-by)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017R1E1A1A01078109)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Keywords
conditional variational autoencoder, de novo molecular design, generative models, latent space control, drug-like molecules, generative adversarial networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review