Does ‘grey’ urban living lead to more ‘green’ holiday nights? A Netherlands Case Study
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Direct exposure, specifically recreational time spent in natural environments per week, cannot accurately be inferred from neighbourhood greenspace near the home.
“In other words, direct exposure, or more specifically in the current context, recreational time spent in natural environments per week, cannot accurately be inferred from neighbourhood greenspace near the home.”
From Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing (2019) · cites this paper as [24]
Impoverished local opportunities need not be a barrier to nature exposure.
“Impoverished local opportunities need not be a barrier to nature exposure23,24.”
From Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing (2019) · cites this paper as [24]
Cites
Understanding the diversity of conceptions of well-being and quality of life
Gasper, D. (2010) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2009.11.006 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: theoretical and methodological guidance
Markevych, I., Schoierer, J., Hartig, T., Chudnovsky, A., Hystad, P., Dzhambov, A. M., de Vries, S., Triguero-Mas, M., Brauer, M., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., et al. (2017) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.028 · Cited by 2,543 · see citing works
Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing
White, M. P., Alcock, I., Grellier, J., Wheeler, B. W., Hartig, T., Warber, S. L., Bone, A., Depledge, M. H., & Fleming, L. E. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-44097-3 · Cited by 1,125 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sijtsma, F. J., de Vries, S., van Hinsberg, A., & Diederiks, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Groningen (NL)
- Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Sijtsma, Frans J.
- ORCID
- Sijtsma, Frans J.
- Venue
- Landscape and Urban Planning
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 250-257
- ISSN
- 0169-2046 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072518468
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- Landscape and Urban Planning (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
- Keywords
- recreational walking, compensatory behavior, urbanization, agglomeration economies, well-being, urban living environment, Dutch cities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
