Cited by 181Quality of Life MeasurementPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionIncome, Poverty, and Inequality

Understanding the diversity of conceptions of well-being and quality of life

Open access
Gasper, Des·2010·The Journal of Socio-Economics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socec.2009.11.006

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hirata, J., and M. Vendrik, 2007. Experienced versus decision utility of income. Pp. 185-208 in Bruni and Porta (eds.) 2007.
  2. Jesus Garcia, J. de, et al., 2007. Value and Happiness in Mexico. Pp. 407-428 in Bruni and Porta eds., 2007.
  3. Phillips, D., 2006. Quality of Life . London: Routledge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gasper, D.
Affiliations
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Gasper, Des
Venue
The Journal of Socio-Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
351-360
ISSN
1053-5357 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081854916
Cited by
181
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
22.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Socio-Economics (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Quality of Life Measurement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Keywords
well-being, quality of life, evaluative judgments, value differences, research tools, ontological assumptions, theoretical approaches

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review