Cited by 150Economic and Environmental ValuationLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesUrban and spatial planning

Preferences for European agrarian landscapes: A meta-analysis of case studies

van Zanten, Boris T., Verburg, Peter H., Koetse, Mark J., van Beukering, Pieter J.H.·2014·Landscape and Urban Planning

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.012

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Zanten, B. T., Verburg, P. H., Koetse, M. J., & van Beukering, P. J. H.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Landscape and Urban Planning
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
132
Pages
89-101
ISSN
0169-2046 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072064163
Cited by
150
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Landscape and Urban Planning (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Urban and spatial planning
Keywords
agricultural landscapes, landscape preference, stated preference, landscape attributes, historic buildings, livestock, socioeconomic context, population density, GDP per capita, upscaling, landscape policy, European landscapes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review