A cross-sectional analysis of biodiversity, publicly accessible green space and mental well-being in Wales using routinely collected data
Open accessAbstract
There is a lack of studies investigating the effects of green space and biodiversity on mental well-being, across a large study area. Generally, exposure to natural environments promotes better physical health, mental health and well-being. This study investigated associations between publicly accessible green space, biodiversity and mental well-being for individuals living in Wales using routinely collected survey and biodiversity data. This study used the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) to measure mental well-being. The 2018–19 National Survey for Wales responses containing the WEMWBS scores and socio-demographic factors were linked to green space and biodiversity data in census areas. By utilising Generalised Additive Models this study found that all environmental metrics were associated with mental well-being. However, after adjustment for socio-demographic factors, only bird species richness remained associated with mental well-being, with a highly non-linear relationship. There was little to no evidence of associations between green space or biodiversity when stratifying by income group. When stratified by rural and urban areas, we found bird, plant and total species richness to be associated with mental well-being. Environmental interventions should consider promoting bird species richness in urban areas which may benefit mental well-being. Future areas of research could include longitudinal studies to explore causal links between green spaces, biodiversity and mental well-being, utilising individual-level exposure.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity.
Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H., & Gaston, K. J. (2007) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149 · Cited by 1,549 · see citing works
What are the benefits of interacting with nature?
Keniger, L., Gaston, K., Irvine, K., & Fuller, R. (2013) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph10030913 · Cited by 1,204 · see citing works
Linton, M.-J., Dieppe, P., & Medina-Lara, A. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010641 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
The relationship between greenspace and the mental wellbeing of adults: a systematic review
Houlden, V., Weich, S., Porto de Albuquerque, J., Jarvis, S., & Rees, K. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203000 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Astell-Burt, T., Mitchell, R., & Hartig, T. (2014) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech-2013-203767 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Relations between urban bird and plant communities and human well-being and connection to nature.
LUCK, G. W., DAVIDSON, P., BOXALL, D., & SMALLBONE, L. (2011) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01685.x · Cited by 228 · see citing works
A systematic review of the health and well-being benefits of biodiverse environments.
Lovell, R., Wheeler, B. W., Higgins, S. L., Irvine, K. N., & Depledge, M. H. (2014) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937404.2013.856361 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
de Bell, S., White, M., Griffiths, A., Darlow, A., Taylor, T., Wheeler, B., & Lovell, R. (2020) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103836 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Howarth, M., Brettle, A., Hardman, M., & Maden, M. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036923 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Life satisfaction linked to the diversity of nature experiences and nature views from the window
Chang, C.-C., Oh, R. R. Y., Nghiem, T. P. L., Zhang, Y., Tan, C. L. Y., Lin, B. B., Gaston, K. J., Fuller, R. A., & Carrasco, L. R. (2020) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103874 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Thwaites, O., Mizen, A., & Fry, R.
- Affiliations
- Swansea University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Thwaites, Oliver
- Venue
- Landscape and Urban Planning
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-03
- Volume
- 243
- Pages
- 104971
- ISSN
- 0169-2046 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4389359880
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 1.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Landscape and Urban Planning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Cronfa (Swansea University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Arborization and Environmental Studies
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Keywords
- psychological well-being, green spaces, biodiversity, bird species richness, plant species richness, nature exposure, urban-rural differences, income, sociodemographic factors, environmental interventions, Wales
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review