The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How to select instruments for the resolution of environmental conflicts?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach
Pascual, U., Balvanera, P., Díaz, S., Pataki, G., Roth, E., Stenseke, M., Watson, R. T., Başak Dessane, E., Islar, M., Kelemen, E., et al. (2017) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006 · Cited by 1,747
Self-citationStirling, A. (2008) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243907311265 · Cited by 1,567
Understanding and managing conservation conflicts
Redpath, S. M., Young, J., Evely, A., Adams, W. M., Sutherland, W. J., Whitehouse, A., Amar, A., Lambert, R. A., Linnell, J. D. C., Watt, A., et al. (2013) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.021 · Cited by 1,361
Stirling, A. (2006) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.010 · Cited by 356
Integrated assessment and modelling: Overview and synthesis of salient dimensions
Hamilton, S. H., ElSawah, S., Guillaume, J. H. A., Jakeman, A. J., & Pierce, S. A. (2015) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.12.005 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Wittmer, H., Rauschmayer, F., & Klauer, B.
- Venue
- Land Use Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-9
- ISSN
- 0264-8377 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988376296
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How to select instruments for the resolution of environmental conflicts? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.09.003
- The paper
- Wittmer, H., Rauschmayer, F., & Klauer, B. (2006). How to select instruments for the resolution of environmental conflicts? Land Use Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.09.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
