Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,747

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach

Open access
Pascual, Unai, Balvanera, Patricia, Díaz, Sandra, Pataki, György, Roth, Eva, Stenseke, Marie, Watson, Robert T, Başak Dessane, Esra, Islar, Mine, Kelemen, Eszter, Maris, Virginie, Quaas, Martin, Subramanian, Suneetha M, Wittmer, Heidi, Adlan, Asia, Ahn, SoEun, Al-Hafedh, Yousef S, Amankwah, Edward, Asah, Stanley T, Berry, Pam, Bilgin, Adem, Breslow, Sara J, Bullock, Craig, Cáceres, Daniel, Daly-Hassen, Hamed, Figueroa, Eugenio, Golden, Christopher D, Gómez-Baggethun, Erik, González-Jiménez, David, Houdet, Joël, Keune, Hans, Kumar, Ritesh, Ma, Keping, May, Peter H, Mead, Aroha, O’Farrell, Patrick, Pandit, Ram, Pengue, Walter, Pichis-Madruga, Ramón, Popa, Florin, Preston, Susan, Pacheco-Balanza, Diego, Saarikoski, Heli, Strassburg, Bernardo B, van den Belt, Marjan, Verma, Madhu, Wickson, Fern, Yagi, Noboyuki·2017·Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Nature is perceived and valued in starkly different and often conflicting ways. This paper presents the rationale for the inclusive valuation of nature’s contributions to people (NCP) in decision making, as well as broad methodological steps for doing so. While developed within the context of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), this approach is more widely applicable to initiatives at the knowledge–policy interface, which require a pluralistic approach to recognizing the diversity of values. We argue that transformative practices aiming at sustainable futures would benefit from embracing such diversity, which require recognizing and addressing power relationships across stakeholder groups that hold different values on human nature-relations and NCP.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 1,747

Metadata

Authors
Pascual, U., Balvanera, P., Díaz, S., Pataki, G., Roth, E., Stenseke, M., Watson, R. T., Başak Dessane, E., Islar, M., Kelemen, E., Maris, V., Quaas, M., Subramanian, S. M., Wittmer, H., Adlan, A., Ahn, S., Al-Hafedh, Y. S., Amankwah, E., Asah, S. T., Berry, P., Bilgin, A., Breslow, S. J., Bullock, C., Cáceres, D., Daly-Hassen, H., Figueroa, E., Golden, C. D., Gómez-Baggethun, E., González-Jiménez, D., Houdet, J., Keune, H., Kumar, R., Ma, K., May, P. H., Mead, A., O’Farrell, P., Pandit, R., Pengue, W., Pichis-Madruga, R., Popa, F., Preston, S., Pacheco-Balanza, D., Saarikoski, H., Strassburg, B. B., van den Belt, M., Verma, M., Wickson, F., & Yagi, N.
Venue
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
26-27
Pages
7-16
ISSN
1877-3435 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006
OpenAlex
W2589424942
Cited by
1,747
References
5
FWCI
21.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006
The paper
Pascual, U., Balvanera, P., Díaz, S., Pataki, G., Roth, E., Stenseke, M., Watson, R. T., Başak Dessane, E., Islar, M., Kelemen, E., Maris, V., Quaas, M., Subramanian, S. M., Wittmer, H., Adlan, A., Ahn, S., Al-Hafedh, Y. S., Amankwah, E., Asah, S. T., . . . Yagi, N. (2017). Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.