Cited by 25Climate Change and Sustainable DevelopmentSustainability and Climate Change GovernanceClimate Change Policy and Economics

Emerging hybrid governance to foster low-emission rural development in the amazon frontier

Milhorance, Carolina, Bursztyn, Marcel·2018·Land Use Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.029

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Milhorance, C., & Bursztyn, M.
Affiliations
Universidade de Brasília (BR)
Corresponding author
Milhorance, Carolina
Venue
Land Use Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
75
Pages
11-20
ISSN
0264-8377 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2789536188
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Land Use Policy (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Agritrop (Cirad) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ford Foundation
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Sustainable Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
hybrid governance, Amazon frontier, Mato Grosso, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, climate policy, policy integration, sustainable development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review