The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are all ultra-processed foods bad for health?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Analyses of the health effects of individual UPF subgroups face methodological challenges including confounding by other food components, multicollinearity between UPF subgroups and total UPF intake, low consumption and little variability within specific subgroups, and uncorrected multiple model testing.
“However, analyses of the health effects of individual UPF subgroups, rather than the overall ultraprocessed dietary pattern, face methodological challenges.These include confounding by other food components (both UPFs and non-UPFs), multicollinearity between UPF subgroups and total UPF intake, low consumption and little variability within specific subgroups, and uncorrected multiple model testing.”
From Ultra-processed foods and human health: the main thesis and the evidence (2025) · cites this paper as [220]
These methodological challenges are all liable to compromise the validity and precision of estimates.
“These challenges are all liable to compromise the validity and precision of estimates.220,221”
From Ultra-processed foods and human health: the main thesis and the evidence (2025) · cites this paper as [220]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lane, M. M., Gamage, E., Du, S., Ashtree, D. N., McGuinness, A. J., Gauci, S., Baker, P., Lawrence, M., Rebholz, C. M., Srour, B., et al. (2024) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-077310 · Cited by 1,153
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Dicken, 2024, Food consumption by degree of food processing and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort analysis of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC), Lancet Reg Health Europe, 46
- Monteiro, 2019, Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them, Public Health Nutr, 22, 936, 10.1017/S1368980018003762 · DOI · Paper page
- Chen, 2023, Ultra-processed food consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: three large prospective U.S. Cohort studies, Diabetes Care, 46, 1335, 10.2337/dc22-1993 · DOI · Paper page
- Gomes, 2024, Ultra-processed food consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: three large prospective U.S. Cohort studies. Diabetes Care 2023;46:1335-1344, Diabetes Care, 47, e22, 10.2337/dc23-1837 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ultra-processed foods and human health: the main thesis and the evidence
Monteiro, C. A., Louzada, M. L., Steele-Martinez, E., Cannon, G., Andrade, G. C., Baker, P., Bes-Rastrollo, M., Bonaccio, M., Gearhardt, A. N., Khandpur, N., et al. (2025) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(25)01565-x · Cited by 339
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Monteiro, C. A., & Rezende, L. F. M.
- Venue
- The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-11
- Volume
- 46
- Pages
- 101106
- ISSN
- 2666-7762
- PMC
- PMC11530752
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Licence
- Funders
- National Council for Scientific and Technological Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
