Indigenous dialogic teaching: Orality in a Tibetan school in China
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Teaching dialogically is challenging in Chinese rural areas because teachers are accustomed to being an authoritative figure who encourages students in teacher-directed, examination-oriented rote learning of content materials that require single correct answers.
“However, teaching dialogically is challenging in Chinese rural areas as teachers are accustomed to being an authoritative figure who encourages students in teacher-directed, examination-oriented rote learning of content materials that require single correct answers (Tong and Zhou 2023).”
From The Impact of a Dialogic Intervention on a Chinese Rural Teacher and Students' Stances Towards Texts (2025) · cites this paper as Tong and Zhou 2023
Cites
What is Debate for? The Rationality of Tibetan Debates and the Role of Humor
Dreyfus, G. B. (2008) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-007-9079-2 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Impact of a Dialogic Intervention on a Chinese Rural Teacher and Students' Stances Towards Texts
Zhong, Y., Davies, M., & Wilson, A. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12816 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tong, L., & Zhou, Y.
- Affiliations
- Sichuan Normal University (CN)
- University of Macau (MO)
- Corresponding author
- Tong, Liqin
- Venue
- Learning, Culture and Social Interaction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-12
- Volume
- 43
- Pages
- 100776
- ISSN
- 2210-6561 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4388742989
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 13.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Learning Culture and Social Interaction (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Linguistics and Education Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
- Keywords
- dialogic teaching, orality, Indigenous pedagogy, debate, monastic education, socially disadvantaged students, rural education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review