The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple forms of dynamic representation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words
Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/s0364-0213(87)80026-5 · Cited by 3,733
Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F., & Reiser, B. J. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.228.4698.456 · Cited by 3,119
Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains
De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543068002179 · Cited by 1,593
Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.3.389 · Cited by 1,191
The functions of multiple representations
Ainsworth, S. (1999) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/s0360-1315(99)00029-9 · Cited by 1,122
Self-citationThe nature of external representations in problem solving
Zhang, J. (1997) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/s0364-0213(99)80022-6 · Cited by 896
Kozma, R. B., & Russell, J. (1997) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199711)34:9<949::aid-tea7>3.0.co;2-u · Cited by 779
THE SPLIT‐ATTENTION EFFECT AS A FACTOR IN THE DESIGN OF INSTRUCTION
CHANDLER, P., & SWELLER, J. (1992) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1992.tb01017.x · Cited by 767
Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics
Lowe, R. K. (2003) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(02)00018-x · Cited by 551
A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: Logic and implementation
Stenning, K. (1995) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/0364-0213(95)90005-5 · Cited by 479
Cited by
DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations
Ainsworth, S. (2006) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001 · Cited by 1,673
Self-citationInstructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis
Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013 · Cited by 992
The learning effects of computer simulations in science education
Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017 · Cited by 985
Koedinger, K. R., Corbett, A. T., & Perfetti, C. (2012) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01245.x · Cited by 772
A Reconsideration of Cognitive Load Theory
Schnotz, W., & Kürschner, C. (2007) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9053-4 · Cited by 755
Metadata
- Authors
- Ainsworth, S., & VanLabeke, N.
- Venue
- Learning and Instruction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 241-255
- ISSN
- 0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132426951
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 13.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple forms of dynamic representation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.002
- The paper
- Ainsworth, S., & VanLabeke, N. (2004). Multiple forms of dynamic representation. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
