The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding the structure of the set of rational numbers: a conceptual change approach
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.3730660207 · Cited by 5,187
Sfard, A. (1991) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/bf00302715 · Cited by 1,852 · cited 1×
“For example, the conceptualization of ratios of integers as numbers, rather than operations, can be accounted for as an ontological shift of ratios from the category of processes to the category of mathematical objects (Sfard, 1991).”
Background
Cited by
Scientific knowledge suppresses but does not supplant earlier intuitions
Shtulman, A., & Valcarcel, J. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.005 · Cited by 418
Metadata
- Authors
- Vamvakoussi, X., & Vosniadou, S.
- Venue
- Learning and Instruction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 453-467
- ISSN
- 0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976930790
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
