Cited by 1,852History and Theory of MathematicsMathematics Education and PedagogyMathematics Education and Teaching Techniques

On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin

Sfard, Anna·1991·Educational Studies in Mathematics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00302715

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Brownell, W. A.: 1935, ?Psychological considerations in learning and teaching arithmetic?, in The Teaching of Arithmetic: Tenth Yearbook of the NCTM, Columbia University Press, New York.
  2. Clements, K.: 1981, ?Visual imagery and school mathematics?, For the Learning of Mathematics 2(2), 33?38.
  3. Dörfler, W.: 1987, ?Empirical investigation of the construction of cognitive schemata from actions?, in Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference of PME, Vol. III, pp. 3?9.
  4. Dörfler, W.: 1989, ?Protocols of actions as a cognitive tool for knowledge construction?, in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference of PME, Paris, Vol. 1, pp. 212?9.
  5. Eisenberg, T. and Dreyfus, T. (eds.): 1989, Visualization in the mathematics curriculum, Special issue of Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 11(1&2).
  6. Kaput, J. J.: 1979, ?Mathematics and learning: Roots of epistemological status?, in Lochhead, J. and Clement, J. (eds.), Cognitive Process Instruction, Franklin Institute Press.
  7. Otte, M.: 1984, ?Komplementarität?, Dialektik 8, 60?75.
  8. Sfard, A.: 1987, ?Two conceptions of mathematical notions: operational and structural?, in Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference of PME, Montreal, Vol. 3, pp. 162?9.
  9. Sfard, A.: 1988, ?Operational vs structural method of teaching mathematics: A case study?, in Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference of PME, Hungary, pp. 560?7.
  10. Sfard, A.: 1989, ?Transition from operational to structural conception: the notion of function revisited?, in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference of PME, Paris, Vol. 3, pp. 151?8.
  11. Sinclair, H. and Sinclair, A.: 1986, ?Children's mastery of written numerals and the construction of basic number concepts?, in Hiebert, J. (ed.), Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.
  12. Thompson, P. W.: 1985, ?Experience, problem solving, and learning mathematics: considerations in developing mathematical curricula?, in E. A.Silver (ed.), Teaching and Learning Mathematical Problem Solving: Multiple Research Perspectives, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sfard, A.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Sfard, Anna
Venue
Educational Studies in Mathematics
Published
1991-02
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
1-36
ISSN
  • 0013-1954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0816
OpenAlex
W2072267223
Cited by
1,852
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 87 · 2015: 90 · 2014: 93 · 2013: 102 · 2012: 72
FWCI
77.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Studies in Mathematics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Theoretical Computer Science › History and Theory of Mathematics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Keywords
structural conception, reification, interiorization, condensation, concept formation, mathematics learning, problem solving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review