Cited by 178Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Can learning from molar and modular worked examples be enhanced by providing instructional explanations and prompting self-explanations?

Open access
Gerjets, Peter, Scheiter, Katharina, Catrambone, Richard·2006·Learning and Instruction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.02.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 178

Authors
Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Catrambone, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Gerjets, Peter
Venue
Learning and Instruction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
104-121
ISSN
0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048827805
Cited by
178
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
13.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
worked examples, instructional explanations, self-explanation prompts, germane cognitive load, intrinsic cognitive load, problem solving, mathematics learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review