The effect of instruction type and dyadic or individual emulation on the quality of higher-order peer feedback in EFL
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Van Steendam et al. (2010, 2014) found that collaborative revision strategy instruction via modelling was more effective than practising with guiding questions.
“The results showed that the collaborative revision strategy instruction via modelling was more effective for improving undergraduates' revision skills than practising the instructed strategy following guiding questions presented in a handout.”
From Learning paths in synthesis writing: Which learning path contributes most to which learning outcome? (2020) · cites this paper as Van Steendam et al. 2010
The Discussion (section 4; page unavailable) explicitly says the hypothesis that observation would outperform practising was falsified: its effectiveness depended on the subsequent emulation setting. Observation helped when followed by collaborative emulation, but practising followed by individual emulation was as effective or better on the posttest revision score. The paper therefore does not support the sentence’s unqualified claim that modelling was more effective than guided practice. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,406 · see citing works
Multilevel analysis techniques and applications
Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & van de Schoot, R. (2002) · Cited by 6,005 · see citing works
Goldstein, H. (2006) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2006.s417 · Cited by 4,960 · see citing works
The Psychology of Written Composition
Cumming, A. H., Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/327270 · Cited by 2,806 · see citing works
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
(1977) · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-10517-x · Cited by 2,457 · see citing works
MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S. W., & Fitzgerald, J. (2005) · Cited by 2,327 · see citing works
Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (1989) · Springer series in cognitive development · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3618-4 · Cited by 1,885 · see citing works
A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445 · Cited by 1,609 · cited 3× · see citing works
“They are particularly effective in teaching students criteria for reflecting on and evaluating writing, and thereby improving their revision skills (Englert et al., 2006; Graham & Perin, 2007).”
BackgroundCollaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches
Jones, A. C. (2000) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/s0360-1315(00)00011-7 · Cited by 1,506 · see citing works
Barron, B. (2003) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1203_1 · Cited by 1,446 · see citing works
A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing.
Hayes, J. R. (1996) · Cited by 1,442 · see citing works
Statistical Power Analysis For The Behavioral Sciences Revised Edition
Daly, J., & Cohen, J. (1987) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2286629 · Cited by 1,399 · see citing works
Collaborative learning : cognitive and computational approaches
Dillenbourg, P. (1999) · Cited by 1,321 · see citing works
Goulias, K. G. (2002) · New directions in civil engineering · doi:10.1201/9781420042283.ch9 · Cited by 1,285 · see citing works
Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections
Storch, N. (2005) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002 · Cited by 1,052 · see citing works
Social origins of self-regulatory competence
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1997) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3204_1 · Cited by 937 · see citing works
Social Cognitive Theory and Self-Regulated Learning
Schunk, D. H. (1989) · Springer series in cognitive development · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3618-4_4 · Cited by 935 · see citing works
Toward an Understanding of the Distinct Nature of L2 Writing: The ESL Research and Its Implications
Silva, T. (1993) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587400 · Cited by 860 · see citing works
Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers
Sommers, N. (1980) · College Composition & Communication · doi:10.2307/356588 · Cited by 749 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Furthermore, less competent revisers have fewer advanced revision strategies at their command (Faigley & Witte, 1981; Sommers, 1980).”
BackgroundResearch on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching
Witte, S. P., Larson, R. L., & Hillocks, G. (1987) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/357721 · Cited by 694 · see citing works
Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007 · Cited by 615 · see citing works
Multilevel Statistical Models (3rd ed.)
Lethonen, R. (2005) · Quarterly Publications of the American Statistical Association · Cited by 544 · see citing works
d’Arcais, G. B. F., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1970) · Cited by 525 · see citing works
Fluency in Writing: Generating Text in L1 and L2
CHENOWETH, N. A., & HAYES, J. R. (2001) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088301018001004 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Topping, K., & Ehly, S. (1998) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410603678 · Cited by 504 · see citing works
The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality
Min, H.-T. (2006) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003 · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981) · College Composition & Communication · doi:10.2307/356602 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Student revision with peer and expert reviewing
Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. A. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality
Berg, E. C. (1999) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80115-5 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction
Mendonça, C. O., Johnson, K. E., & Mendonca, C. O. (1994) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587558 · Cited by 446 · see citing works
Coherence, Cohesion, and Writing Quality
Witte, S. P., & Faigley, L. L. (1981) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/356693 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Training students to become successful peer reviewers
Min, H. (2005) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.11.003 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Acquiring writing revision and self-regulatory skill through observation and emulation
Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2002) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.660 · Cited by 412 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Zimmerman and Kitsantas (2002) stress that, for emulation to take place, students should ideally receive social feedback from others about their performance.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAlamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2001) · Studies in Writing · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0804-4 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Strijbos, J.-W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Topping, K. J., & Ehly, S. W. (2001) · Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) · doi:10.4135/9781412963848.n207 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Levy, C. M., & Ransdell, S. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203811122 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Kirschner, F., PAAS, F. G. W. C., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.008 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Graham, S., Schwartz, S. S., & MacArthur, C. A. (1993) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/002221949302600404 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Richness in Writing: Empowering Esl Students
Johnson, D. M., & Roen, D. H. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Social-Cognitive Dimensions of Interaction in L2 Peer Revision
de Guerrero, M. C. M., & Villamil, O. S. (1994) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02065.x · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators
Stanley, J. (1992) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(92)90004-9 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Collaborative writing: The effects of metacognitive prompting and structured peer interaction
Yarrow, F., & Topping, K. J. (2001) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1348/000709901158514 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Theories, Models and Methodology in Writing Research
Rijlaarsdam, G., Bergh, V. D. H., & Couzijn, M. (1996) · Amsterdam University Press eBooks · doi:10.5117/9789053561973 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Self-citationExecutive control in the revising of students with learning and writing difficulties.
Graham, S. (1997) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.223 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Repetition in the Collaborative Discourse of L2 Learners: A Vygotskian Perspective
DiCamilla, F. J., & Antón, M. (1997) · Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes · doi:10.3138/cmlr.53.4.609 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Revising in two languages: A multi-dimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL
Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R., & de Glopper, K. (2006) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.06.002 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Observational learning and the effects of model-observer similarity.
Braaksma, M. A. H., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2002) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.405 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Self-citationTenets of Sociocultural Theory in Writing Instruction Research.
Englert, C. S., Mariage, T. V., & Dunsmore, K. (2006) · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Effects of Training for Peer Response on Students' Comments and Interaction
Zhu, W. (1995) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088395012004004 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Revision Cognitive and Instructional Processes
Allal, L. K., Chanquoy, L., & Largy, P. (2004) · Studies in writing · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1048-1 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Baker, S., Gersten, R. M., & Scanlon, D. J. (2002) · Learning Disabilities Research and Practice · doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00032 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
A Peer Editor Strategy: Guiding Learning-Disabled Students in Response and Revision
Stoddard, B., & MacArthur, C. A. (1993) · Research in the Teaching of English · doi:10.58680/rte199315422 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Learning to write by observation of writing and reading processes: effects on learning and transfer
Couzijn, M. (1999) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(98)00040-1 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
ESL student response stances in a peer-review task
Mangelsdorf, K., & Schlumberger, A. (1992) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(92)90005-a · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Metalinguistic Activity in Learning to Write
Camps, A., & Milian, M. (1999) · Amsterdam University Press eBooks · doi:10.5117/9789053563410 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
The Psychology of Written Language: Developmental and Educational Perspectives
Frawley, W., & Martlew, M. (1985) · Language · doi:10.2307/413469 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
The Revising Processes of Sixth-Grade Writers With and Without Peer Feedback
Brakel, V. L. (1990) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.1990.10885987 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Potential Problems with Peer Responding in ESL Writing Classes
Leki, I. (1990) · The CATESOL journal. · doi:10.5070/b5.36653 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Tang, G. M. (1999) · TESL Canada Journal · doi:10.18806/tesl.v16i2.716 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Introduction to Peer-Assisted Learning
Ehly, S. W. (1998) · doi:10.4324/9781410603678-7 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
An aptitude–treatment interaction approach to writing-to-learn
Kieft, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2007) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.07.004 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Self-citationEffects of Collaborative Revision on Children’s Ability to Write Understandable Narrative Texts
Boscolo, P., & Ascorti, K. (2004) · Studies in writing · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1048-1_10 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Individual and cooperative computer-writing and revising: Who gets the best results?
Zammuner, V. (1995) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/0959-4752(95)00005-n · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Paz, S. D. L. (2007) · Reading & Writing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10573560701277609 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Writing and Learning to Write: A Double Challenge
Rijlaarsdam, G., & Couzijn, M. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-47614-2_9 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial-Cognitive Dimensions of Interaction in L2 Peer Revision
de Guerrero, M. C. M., & Villamil, O. S. (1994) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328586 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Pedagogy: teaching for learning
Tomlinson, P. D., Dockrell, J. E., & Winne, P. H. (2005) · British Psychological Society eBooks · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Attention Strategies in revising foreign language text.
Broekkamp, H., & van den Bergh, H. (1996) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Collaborative Revision and Metacognitive Reflection in a Situation of Narrative Text Production
Rouiller, Y. (2004) · Studies in writing · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1048-1_11 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Effects of Peer Critiquing and Model Analysis on the Quality of Biology Student Laboratory Reports.
Flynn, E. A. (1982) · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Zellermayer, M., Olshtain, E., & Cohen, J. (1991) · Linguistics and Education · doi:10.1016/0898-5898(91)90015-b · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Psychology and The teaching of writing in 60 minutes
Rijlaarsdam, G., Braaksma, M. A. H., Couzijn, M., Janssen, T., Kieft, M., Broekkamp, H., & van den Bergh, H. (2004) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- [7]7. Rijlaarsdam, G. (Ed.), Studies in writing, Vol. 13 (pp. 157e170). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
- [20]20. Fitzgerald, J. (1992). Towards knowledge in writing: Illustration from revision studies. New York: Springer.
- [26]26. Graham, S., Schwartz, S., & MacArthur, C. (1993). Learning disabled and normally achieving students' knowledge of the writing and the composing process, attitude to writing and self-efficacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 237e249.
- [34]34. MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2004). Revision with struggling writers. In L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, & P. Largy (Eds.), Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes. In Rijlaarsdam, G. (Ed.), Studies in writing, Vol. 13 (pp. 125e137). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
- [46]46. A double challenge. In R. Simons, J. Van der Linden, & T. Duffy (Eds.), New learning (pp. 157e190). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007 · Cited by 615 · see citing works
Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions
van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing
Steiss, J., Tate, T., Graham, S., Cruz, J., Hebert, M., Wang, J., Moon, Y., Tseng, W., Warschauer, M., & Olson, C. B. (2024) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894 · Cited by 509 · see citing works
Student revision with peer and expert reviewing
Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. A. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Strijbos, J.-W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Peer reviewers learn from giving comments
Cho, Y. H., & Cho, K. (2011) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9146-1 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Peer Feedback in Second Language Writing
Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2016) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444816000161 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective
Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.005 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments
Strijbos, J.-W., & Sluijsmans, D. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.002 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.010 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment
Topping, K. J. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.003 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Hovardas, T., Tsivitanidou, O. E., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.019 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Peer assessment without assessment criteria
Jones, I., & Alcock, L. (2013) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.821974 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., & Schellens, T. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0339-8 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2020) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831220945266 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Quality of Feedback in Higher Education: A Review of Literature
Haughney, K., Wakeman, S., & Hart, L. (2020) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci10030060 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Investigating secondary school students’ unmediated peer assessment skills
Tsivitanidou, O., Zacharia, Z. C., & Hovardas, T. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.08.002 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Exploring L2 writers' collaborative revision interactions and their writing performance
Hanjani, A. M., & Li, L. (2014) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.03.004 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Effect of teacher modeling and feedback on EFL students’ peer review skills in peer review training
Min, H. (2016) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.004 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Gan, M. J. S., & Hattie, J. (2014) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-014-9319-4 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101897 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Gielen, M., & Wever, B. D. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.012 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Effects of digital video-based feedback environments on pre-service teachers’ feedback competence
Prilop, C. N., Weber, K. E., & Kleinknecht, M. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.011 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Groenendijk, T., Janssen, T., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2011) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02052.x · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citationGielen, M., & Wever, B. D. (2015) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12096 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
EFL writing revision with blind expert and peer review using a CMC open forum
Wu, W.-C. V., Petit, E., & Chen, C. (2014) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.937442 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Using scaffolded rubrics to improve peer assessment in a MOOC writing course
Ashton, S., & Davies, R. (2015) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2015.1081733 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Learning to write in an online writing center: The effect of learning styles on the writing process
Waes, L. V., van Weijen, D., & Leijten, M. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.009 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Combined Training of One Cognitive and One Metacognitive Strategy Improves Academic Writing Skills
Wischgoll, A. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00187 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Groenendijk, T., Janssen, T., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2013) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.001 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationPredictive Effects of Online Peer Feedback Types on Performance Quality
Yu, F. Y., & Wu, C. P. (2013) · Tamkang University Institutional Repository (TKUIR) · Cited by 63 · see citing works
The effects of autonomy support on student engagement in peer assessment
Yuan, J., & Kim, C. (2017) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-017-9538-x · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Effective Feedback Design Using Free Technologies
Yuan, J., & Kim, C. (2015) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633115571929 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Teacher modeling on EFL reviewers’ audience-aware feedback and affectivity in L2 peer review
Chang, C. Y.-H. (2015) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.04.001 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
The Effects of Online Feedback Training on Students’ Text Revision
Yang, Y.-F., & Meng, W.-T. (2013) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44331 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Effective Use of Peer Assessment in a Graduate Level Writing Assignment: A Case Study
Landry, A., Jacobs, S., & Newton, G. S. (2014) · International Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.5430/ijhe.v4n1p38 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Effects of anonymity on online peer review in second-language writing
van den Bos, A. H., & Tan, E. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103638 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Learning paths in synthesis writing: Which learning path contributes most to which learning outcome?
Mateos, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., Martín, E., Cuevas, I., Van den Bergh, H., & Solari, M. (2020) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-020-09508-3 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationGao, Y., & Wang, X. (2022) · Journal of language and Education · doi:10.17323/jle.2022.15962 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Papadopoulos, P. M., Λάγκας, Θ., & Demetriadis, S. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.005 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Masruddin, M. (2018) · Arab World English Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3258815 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Zhang, X., & McEneaney, J. E. (2019) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.259 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Adopting ChatGPT as a writing buddy in the advanced L2 writing class
Strobl, C., Menke-Bazhutkina, I., Abel, N., & Michel, M. C. (2024) · Technology in Language Teaching & Learning · doi:10.29140/tltl.v6n1.1168 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Nguyen, H. V., Xiong, W., & Litman, D. J. (2017) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0136-6 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Ebadijalal, M., & Yousofi, N. (2021) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2021.1957990 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J.-W., & Ufer, S. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1485012 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
The mediating effect of instruction on pair composition in L2 revision and writing
Van Steendam, E., Rijlaarsdam, G. C. W., Van den Bergh, H. H., & Sercu, L. (2014) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-014-9318-5 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationWang, Y.-H., & Liao, H.-C. (2017) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym9080141 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Explicating peer feedback quality and its impact on feedback implementation in EFL writing
He, W., & Gao, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1177094 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
The Role of Readers in Writing Development: Writing Students Bringing Their Texts to the Test
Rijlaarsdam, G., Braaksma, M. A. H., Couzijn, M., Janssen, T., Kieft, M., Raedts, M., Steendam, E. V., Toorenaar, A., & van den Bergh, H. (2009) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9780857021069.n31 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationHarney, O., Hogan, M. J., & Quinn, S. (2017) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-017-9263-9 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J.-W., & Ufer, S. (2018) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.07.003 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Interpreting quality as evaluated by peer students
Su, W. (2019) · The Interpreter and Translator Trainer · doi:10.1080/1750399x.2018.1564192 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Optimal feedback structure and interactional pattern in formative peer practices: Students' beliefs
Ghahari, S., & Sedaghat, M. (2018) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2018.02.003 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Supporting the uptake process with dialogic peer screencast feedback: a sociomaterial perspective
Wood, J. M. (2022) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2022.2042243 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Raedts, M., Steendam, E. V., Grez, L. D., Hendrickx, J., & Masui, C. (2017) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2017.08.03.01 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
The Effects of Peer Feedback on the Essay Writing Performances of EFL Students
Uymaz, E. (2019) · International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Grade one peer and teacher feedback on student writing
Peterson, S. S., & Portier, C. (2012) · Education 3-13 · doi:10.1080/03004279.2012.670256 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Student views of peer assessment at the International School of Lausanne
Foley, S. (2013) · Journal of Research in International Education · doi:10.1177/1475240913509766 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102210 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Online Peer Discourse in a Writing Classroom.
Choi, J. (2014) · International journal on teaching and learning in higher education · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Students’ Perspectives on Peer Assessment
Hébel, F. L., Constantinou, C. P., Hošpesová, A., Grob, R., Holmeier, M., Montpied, P., Moulin, M., Petr, J., Rokos, L., Stuchlíková, I., et al. (2017) · Contributions from science education research · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63248-3_6 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Alnasser, S. M. N. (2022) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440221123021 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Topping, K. J. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.09021-7 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Jiang, J., & Yu, Y. (2014) · International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education · doi:10.4018/ijicte.2014070103 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-55754-9_17 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Peer Feedback in Teaching and Learning
Lam, C. N. C., & Habil, H. (2021) · Pertanika journal of social science & humanities · doi:10.47836/pjssh.29.3.25 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
van der Loo, J., Krahmer, E., & van Amelsvoort, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00019 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
van Blankenstein, F. M., O’Sullivan, J., Saab, N., & Paul Steendijk, A. (2021) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02755-z · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Boon, S. I. (2013) · Education 3-13 · doi:10.1080/03004279.2013.856930 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Students' argumentation performance in online learning environments: Bridging culture and gender
Ranjbaran, F., Babaee, M., Parvaneh Akhteh Khaneh, M., Gohari, M., Daneshvar Ghorbani, B., Taghizadeh Kerman, N., Banihashem, S. K., & Noroozi, O. (2023) · International Journal of Technology in Education · doi:10.46328/ijte.460 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Exploring Writing Circles as Innovative, Collaborative Writing Structures with Teacher Candidates
Roberts, S. K., Blanch, N., & Gurjar, N. (2017) · ScholarWorks - WMU (Western Michigan University) · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Bridging the language and cultural gaps: the use of blogs
García-Sánchez, S., & Rojas-Lizana, S. (2012) · Technology, Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2012.719396 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Souissi, H., Souissi, M. A., Trabelsi, O., Souissi, O., Souissi, H., Chikh, S., Bragazzi, N. L., & Souissi, N. (2022) · International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching · doi:10.1177/17479541221122385 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
van Blankenstein, F. V., Truțescu, G.-O., van der Rijst, R. M., & Saab, N. (2019) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-019-09482-5
Hamidnia, M., Ketabi, S., & Amirian, Z. (2020) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.22132/tel.2020.100594 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Toward the Integration of Peer Reviewing and Computational Linguistics Approaches
Park, J., & Cho, K. (2016) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633116656454 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Trained Peer Written Feedback and Teacher Written Feedback: Similar or Different?
Min, H. (2018) · English Teaching & Learning · doi:10.1007/s42321-018-0009-1 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
López, M. B., Steendam, E. V., Speelman, D., & Buyse, K. (2021) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2021.13.01.02 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Effects of peer instruction on academic achievement: a meta-analysis
Öz, E. (2023) · Pedagogies An International Journal · doi:10.1080/1554480x.2023.2246447 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Msiza, V., Zondi, T., & Couch, L. (2020) · Journal of Education · doi:10.17159/2520-9868/i79a04 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Hilk, C. L. (2013) · University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Aben, J. E. J., Lara, M. M., Timmermans, A. C., Dingyloudi, F., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2024) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-024-09660-0 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Aben, J. E. J., Timmermans, A. C., Dingyloudi, F., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2023) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101248 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Analysis of Using Multimodal Feedback in Writing Instruction from EFL Learners’ Perspective
Zhang, Y. (2018) · English Language and Literature Studies · doi:10.5539/ells.v8n4p21 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Vocabulary learning from reading: examining interactions between task and learner related variables
Wu, X., Lowyck, J., Sercu, L., & Elen, J. (2012) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-012-0113-x · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationAn Exploration of the Reliability and Validity of Peer Assessment of Writing in Secondary Education
Meletiadou, E., & Tsagari, D. (2014) · doi:10.2478/9788376560915.p14 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Alnasser, S. M. N. (2022) · Journal of Language Teaching and Research · doi:10.17507/jltr.1303.24 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Negotiating Meaning at a Distance: Peer Feedback in Electronic Learning Translation Environments
Lewandowska‐Tomaszczyk, B., Thelen, M., van Egdom, G.-W., Verbeeck, D., & Bogucki, Ł. (2016) · Peter Lang eBooks · doi:10.3726/978-3-653-05899-4/18 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The case of 'Yummy Yummy' - a replication of an intervention program
Amir, A., Atkin, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2021) · L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature · doi:10.17239/l1esll-2021.21.01.16 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationde Smet, M. J. R., Brand‐Gruwel, S., & Kirschner, P. A. (2023) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12825 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Biton, Y. (2025) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education · doi:10.29333/ejmste/15794 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Alnasser, S. M. N. (2018) · Universal Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.13189/ujer.2018.060804 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Foreign Language Learners' Perceptions of Chatbot-Assisted Speech-Giving Tasks
Huang, S. R., & Wang, W. (2025) · International Conference on Educational and Information Technology · doi:10.1109/iceit64364.2025.10975878 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Aben, J. E. J., de Jong, J., Coupé, G., Meijntz, M., & Bouwer, R. (2025) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-025-10743-8 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Alnasser, S. M. N., & Alyousef, H. S. (2014) · International Journal of English Language Education · doi:10.5296/ijele.v3i1.6764 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Lee, I. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3924-9_7 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Improving student reading comprehension through editorship
Higley, C., Elliott, K. C., & Cheruvelil, J. (2018) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1553030 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Wali, F. (2017) · Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Impact of Teacher and Peer Feedback on University Students' Spelling and Punctuation
Al-Farsi, S., & Slimi, Z. (2025) · European Journal of English Language Studies · doi:10.12973/ejels.5.2.113 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Van Steendam, E., Rijlaarsdam, G., Sercu, L., & Van den Bergh, H.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Venue
- Learning and Instruction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 316-327
- ISSN
- 0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2157381667
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 51.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Lirias (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- peer feedback, social cognitive model, observation, practice, strategy acquisition, EFL writing, business English, global feedback
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review