Cited by 99Science Education and PedagogyEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessEducational Methods and Outcomes

How student characteristics affect girls' and boys' verbal engagement in physics instruction

Jurik, Verena, Gröschner, Alexander, Seidel, Tina·2013·Learning and Instruction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.09.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jurik, V., Gröschner, A., & Seidel, T.
Affiliations
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
Jurik, Verena
Venue
Learning and Instruction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
23
Pages
33-42
ISSN
0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000543455
Cited by
99
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
17.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion)
Funders
Jacobs Foundation, Zurich, Switzerland
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Outcomes
Keywords
student characteristics, physics education, gender differences, student-teacher interaction, cognitive ability, prior knowledge, self-concept, student interest, student profile, high school physics, classroom interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review