Quality of educational dialogue and association with students’ academic performance
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Teacher-student dialogue that promotes student contribution has been reported as having positive implications for attitudes to schooling and peers and for academic attainment in mathematics, science and literacy.
“Teacher-student dialogue that promotes student contribution has also been reported as having positive implications for attitudes to schooling and peers (Richter & Tjosvold, 1980) and for academic attainment in mathematics, science and literacy (Clarke, Xu, & Wan, 2010;Muhonen, Pakarinen, Poikkeus, Lerkkanen, & Rasku-Puttonen, 2018).”
From Teacher–Student Dialogue During Classroom Teaching: Does It Really Impact on Student Outcomes? (2019) · cites this paper as Muhonen et al., 2018
Benefits for mathematics, science, literacy and oral communicative competence have been reported when teachers build on or elaborate students' ideas and encourage them to do the same, or do so while encouraging explanation and justification.
“Relating to the second and third themes, benefits for mathematics, science, literacy and oral communicative competence have been reported when teachers build on or elaborate students' ideas and encourage them to do the same; or do such things while also encouraging students to explain and justify their ideas (Muhonen et al., 2018;O'Connor et al., 2015;van der Veen et al., 2017).”
From Teacher–Student Dialogue During Classroom Teaching: Does It Really Impact on Student Outcomes? (2019) · cites this paper as Muhonen et al., 2018
Muhonen et al. (2018) reports high ratings for 'building upon' during dialogue being positively associated with attainment in science.
“For that reason, it seems unnecessary at this stage to be concerned at apparent discrepancies with the work of Muhonen et al. (2018), which reports high ratings for 'building upon' during dialogue being positively associated with attainment in science.”
From Teacher–Student Dialogue During Classroom Teaching: Does It Really Impact on Student Outcomes? (2019) · cites this paper as Muhonen et al. (2018)
Students in talk-intensive classes in which students speak often, are involved in deep and meaningful conversations, and have supportive teachers benefit positively.
“Several studies have confirmed a positive impact for students located in”
From How vocal and silent forms of participation in combination relate to student achievement (2023) · cites this paper as Muhonen et al., 2018
Cites
THE ROLE OF TUTORING IN PROBLEM SOLVING <sup>*</sup>
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x · Cited by 8,851 · see citing works
Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context
Rogoff, B. (1990) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195059731.001.0001 · Cited by 4,709 · see citing works
Scaffolding in Teacher–Student Interaction: A Decade of Research
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6 · Cited by 1,873 · see citing works
Classroom Interaction in Science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses
Chin, C. (2006) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690600621100 · Cited by 566 · see citing works
What's the use of 'triadic dialogue'?: an investigation of teacher-student interaction
Nassaji, H. (2000) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/21.3.376 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
Influence of Oral Discussion on Written Argument
Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R. C., McNurlen, B., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Archodidou, A., & Kim, S.-Y. (2001) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2001.9651596 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (2008) · Exploring Talk in School: Inspired by the Work of Douglas Barnes · doi:10.4135/9781446279526.n4 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teacher–Student Dialogue During Classroom Teaching: Does It Really Impact on Student Outcomes?
Howe, C., Hennessy, S., Mercer, N., Vrikki, M., & Wheatley, L. (2019) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Sedova, K., Sedlacek, M., Svaricek, R., Majcik, M., Navratilova, J., Drexlerova, A., Kychler, J., & Salamounova, Z. (2019) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101217 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
VIVID: Human-AI Collaborative Authoring of Vicarious Dialogues from Lecture Videos
Choi, S., Lee, H., Lee, Y., & Kim, J. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642867 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
How vocal and silent forms of participation in combination relate to student achievement
Sedova, K., & Sedlacek, M. (2023) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-022-09609-1 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Several studies have confirmed a positive impact for students located in “talk intensive” classes in which students speak often, are involved in deep and meaningful conversations, and have supportive teachers (Alexander, 2018; Muhonen et al., 2018; O’Connor et al., 2015).”
Background
- Authors
- Muhonen, H., Pakarinen, E., Poikkeus, A.-M., Lerkkanen, M.-K., & Rasku-Puttonen, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Jyväskylä (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Muhonen, Heli
- ORCID
- Venue
- Learning and Instruction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 55
- Pages
- 67-79
- ISSN
- 0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2762344783
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 23.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- urn.fi
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion)
- Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- University of Jyväskylä
- Ellen and Artturi Nyyssönen Foundation
- Finnish Academy (268 586 for 2013–2017, 292 466 for 2015–2019)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
- Keywords
- educational dialogue, dialogic teaching, classroom discourse, academic performance, language arts instruction, science instruction, physics and chemistry, classroom assessment, class S, sixth grade students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review