Cited by 13Forensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisPoisoning and overdose treatmentsForeign Body Medical Cases

Death from accidental poisoning of methamphetamine by leaking into alimentary tract in drug traffic: A case report

Li, Ru-Bo, Guan, Da-Wei, Zhu, Bao-Li, Zhang, Guo-Hua, Zhao, Rui·2009·Legal Medicine

Abstract

A case of acute mathamphetamine (MA) poisoning death was occasionally found in autopsy by leaking into alimentary tract from package in drug traffic. A Korean man (39-year-old) was found dead in his apartment in Shenyang and 158 columned-shaped packages (390 g) of MA were found in his alimentary tract by autopsy, in which four packages were found in the esophagus, 118 in the stomach and 36 in the lower part of small intestine. The packages were wrapped with tinfoil and plastic film, from which one package in the stomach was empty and ruptured. Extreme pulmonary edema, congestion and hemorrhage as well as moderate edema, congestion and petechial hemorrhage in the other viscera were observed at autopsy and microscopically. Simultaneously AMP (amphatamine) in urine was tested positive by Trige DOA kit. Quantitative analysis was performed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Extremely high concentrations of MA were found in the cardiac blood (24.8 microg/mL), the urine (191 microg/mL), the liver (116 microg/mL) and the gastric contents (1045 microg/mL), and no alcohol and other conventional drugs or poisons were detected in the same samples. The poisoning dosage is 5 microg/mL in the plasma and lethal dosage is 10-40 microg/mL in the plasma according the report. This high concentrations of MA in blood indicated that the cause of death was result from acute MA poisoning due to MA leaking into stomach. Much attention must be paid in the body packer of drugs in illegal drug traf…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.legalmed.2009.02.028

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Contingency management combined with other behavioral health interventions has a small effect on reducing adolescent and young adult cannabis use and increasing treatment retention compared to behavioral health interventions without contingency management.

    “CM in combination with other behavioral health interventions has been shown to have a small effect on reducing adolescent and young adult cannabis use and increasing treatment retention compared to behavioral health interventions without CM.180,181”

Cited by

Authors
Li, R.-B., Guan, D.-W., Zhu, B.-L., Zhang, G.-H., & Zhao, R.
Affiliations
  • China Medical University (CN)
  • Osaka City University (JP)
Corresponding author
Li, Ru-Bo
Venue
Legal Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
11
Pages
S491-S493
ISSN
1344-6223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082335123
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Legal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Foreign Body Medical Cases
Keywords
drug trafficking, body packing, drug ingestion, accidental poisoning, pulmonary edema, toxicokinetics, lethal dose
MeSH terms
Accidents, Adult, Amphetamine, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Crime, Drug Packaging, Gastrointestinal Contents, Hemorrhage, Humans, Intestines, Liver, Male, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Methamphetamine, Pulmonary Edema, Stomach, Gastrointestinal Tract, Forensic Pathology, Forensic Toxicology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review