Cited by 8Chronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlBiosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods

Cepheid xpert monitor platform for the confirmation of BCR-ABL1 IS conversion factors for the molecular monitoring of chronic myeloid leukaemia

Gerrard, Gareth, Foong, Hui En, Mudge, Katherine, Alikian, Mary, Apperley, Jane F., Foroni, Letizia·2016·Leukemia Research

Abstract

Molecular monitoring of BCR-ABL1 expression in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) is well established. As the International Scale (IS) normalised BCR-ABL1/ABL1 ratio at 3 months post-treatment is now an important milestone in patients' treatment schedule, the reliable and reproducible measurement of BCR-ABL1 levels is therefore paramount. IS conversion factors (CF) are established via sample exchange and yearly ratification with an external reference laboratory. Since any change to an established IS CF could lead to discontinuity in longitudinal results, we wished to add an internal verification step as an additional safeguard. We used the Cepheid GeneXpert qPCR and IS calibrated Xpert BCR-ABL Monitor cartridge system, parallel to our in-house pipeline on 50 CML samples, over the period of one week to verify the CF for those samples and compare it to the externally provided CF. The median non-IS in-house BCR-ABL1/ABL1 values were significantly different than that from the IS GeneXpert, but they became non-significant when adjusted to CF provided by the CXM and by the current external CF, validating it. These metrics can help decide to accept or reject an updated CF value, especially where a significant change in CF might lead to a discontinuity in ongoing patient monitoring.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.leukres.2016.08.007

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gerrard, G., Foong, H. E., Mudge, K., Alikian, M., Apperley, J. F., & Foroni, L.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
  • Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Gerrard, Gareth
Venue
Leukemia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
49
Pages
47-50
ISSN
0145-2126 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2515502958
Cited by
8
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Leukemia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0611-10275)
  • Imperial College London
  • NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Keywords
chronic myeloid leukemia, BCR-ABL1, molecular monitoring, qPCR assay validation
MeSH terms
Humans, Monitoring, Physiologic, Reference Standards, Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive, Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review