Cited by 81Spatial Cognition and NavigationEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessGender and Technology in Education

Confidence and gender differences on the Mental Rotations Test

Cooke-Simpson, Amanda, Voyer, Daniel·2007·Learning and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.009

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-confidence has received support in mediating the relationship between gender and performance on spatial tests.

    “Self-confidence has received support in mediating the relationship between gender and performance on spatial tests (Arrighi & Hausmann, 2022;Cooke-Simpson & Voyer, 2007;Picucci et al., 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cooke-Simpson, A., & Voyer, D.
Affiliations
University of New Brunswick (CA)
Corresponding author
Voyer, Daniel
Venue
Learning and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
181-186
ISSN
1041-6080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074809147
Cited by
81
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Learning and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
self-confidence, gender differences, guessing behavior, metacognition, Brier score, performance accuracy, spatial ability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review