The multimodal organization of speaker selection in classroom interaction
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Taking a multimodal approach towards teachers' turn-allocation and management techniques in EFL contexts is under-researched.
“What seems to be missing, or under-researched, in the literature is taking a multimodal approach towards teachers”
From A Multisemiotic Investigation of Iranian EFL Teachers’ Turn-allocation Strategies in their Classroom Interactions (2022) · cites this paper as Lauzon & Berger, 2015
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ghiasvand, F., & PhD Candidate of Applied Linguistics, A. T. U. (2022) · Language Related Research · doi:10.52547/lrr.13.3.17 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fasel Lauzon, V., & Berger, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- ORCID
- Berger, Evelyne
- Venue
- Linguistics and Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 31
- Pages
- 14-29
- ISSN
- 0898-5898 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W409034613
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 13.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Linguistics and Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Keywords
- turn allocation, classroom interaction, French as a second language, teacher-student relationship, turn transitions, sequence organization, multimodality, teacher control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
