CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 25Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorLibrary Science and Information LiteracyLibrary Science and Information

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Scenarios in information seeking and information retrieval research: A methodological application and discussion

Kim, Jeonghyun·2012·Library & Information Science Research
DOI 10.1016/j.lisr.2012.04.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lisr.2012.04.002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Abbott, 1993, Studying policy and practice: Use of vignettes, Nurse Researcher, 1, 81, 10.7748/nr.1.2.81.s10 · DOI
  2. Alexander, 1978, The use of vignettes in survey research, Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 93, 10.1086/268432 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Balatsoukas, 2010, Effects of granularity of search results on the relevance judgment behavior of engineers: Building system for retrieval and understanding of context, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 453, 10.1002/asi.21268 · DOI
  4. Barter, 1999, The use of vignettes in qualitative research, Social Research Update, 25
  5. Beaulieu, 1996, Evaluating interactive systems in TREC, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47, 85, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199601)47:1<85::AID-ASI8>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
  6. Beldad, 2010, Reading the least read? Indicators of users' intention to consult privacy statements on municipal websites, Government Information Quarterly, 27, 238, 10.1016/j.giq.2010.01.004 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bilal, 2002, Perspectives on children's navigation of the World Wide Web: Does the type of search task make a difference?, Online Information Review, 26, 108, 10.1108/14684520210425376 · DOI
  8. Borlund, 2000, Experimental components for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems, Journal of Documentation, 56, 71, 10.1108/EUM0000000007110 · DOI
  9. Borlund, 2003, The IIR evaluation model: A framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems, Information Research, 8
  10. Borlund, 1997, The development of a method for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems, Journal of Documentation, 53, 225, 10.1108/EUM0000000007198 · DOI
  11. Campbell, 1992, Will the real scenario please stand up?, ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 24, 6, 10.1145/142386.1054872 · DOI
  12. Choi, 2010, Effects of contextual factors on image searching on the Web, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 2011, 10.1002/asi.21386 · DOI
  13. Finch, 1987, The vignette technique in survey research, Sociology, 21, 105, 10.1177/0038038587021001008 · DOI
  14. Fu, 2010, Towards a model of implicit feedback for Web search, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 30, 10.1002/asi.21198 · DOI
  15. Giesecke, 1999, Scenario planning and collection development, Journal of Library Administration, 28, 81, 10.1300/J111v28n01_07 · DOI
  16. Gould, 1996, Using vignettes to collect data for nursing research studies: How valid are the findings?, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 5, 207, 10.1111/j.1365-2702.1996.tb00253.x · DOI
  17. Gwizdka, 2010, Distribution of cognitive load in Web search, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 2167, 10.1002/asi.21385 · DOI
  18. Gwizdka, 2009, The role of subjective factors in the information search process, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 2452, 10.1002/asi.21183 · DOI
  19. Haas, 1984, Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research in information science, Information Processing and Management, 20, 229, 10.1016/0306-4573(84)90053-0 · DOI
  20. Hannabuss, 2001, Scenario planning for libraries, Library Management, 22, 168, 10.1108/01435120110388724 · DOI
  21. Hansen, 2005, Effects of foreign language and task scenario on relevance assessment, Journal of Documentation, 61, 623, 10.1108/00220410510625831 · DOI
  22. Hechter, 1999, Do values matter? An analysis of advance directives for medical treatment, European Sociological Review, 15, 405, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018273 · DOI
  23. Herskovits, 1950, The hypothetical situation: A technique of field research, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 6, 32, 10.1086/soutjanth.6.1.3628688 · DOI
  24. Hirsh, 1999, Children's relevance criteria and information seeking on electronic resources, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 1265, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:14<1265::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI
  25. Hughes, 2002, The application of vignettes in social and nursing research, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 37, 382, 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02100.x · DOI
  26. Hunter, 2009, New Zealanders' attitudes towards access to their electronic health records: Preliminary results from a national study using vignettes, Health Informatics Journal, 15, 212, 10.1177/1460458209337435 · DOI
  27. Jeffries, 2011, Comparing vignette instruction and assessment tasks to classroom observations and reflections, The Teacher Educator, 46, 161, 10.1080/08878730.2011.552667 · DOI
  28. Johnson, 2005, Meeting the educational needs of people at risk of diabetes-related amputations: A vignette study with patients and professionals, Health Expectations, 8, 324, 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00344.x · DOI
  29. Joho, 2008, Effectiveness of additional representations for the search result presentation on the Web, Information Processing and Management, 44, 226, 10.1016/j.ipm.2007.02.004 · DOI
  30. Kelly, 2009, Methods for evaluating interactive information retrieval systems with users, Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 3, 1
  31. Kim, 2008, Task as a context for information seeking: An investigation of Web searching for daily life tasks, Libri, 58, 172, 10.1515/libr.2008.018 · DOI
  32. Kim, 2009, Describing and predicting information seeking behavior on the Web, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 679, 10.1002/asi.21035 · DOI
  33. Kules, 2008, Users can change their web search tactics: Design guidelines for categorized overviews, Information Processing and Management, 44, 463, 10.1016/j.ipm.2007.07.014 · DOI
  34. Landry, 2006, Work roles, tasks, and the information behavior of dentists, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 1896, 10.1002/asi.20385 · DOI
  35. Li, 2010, An exploration of the relationships between work task and interactive information search behavior, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 1771, 10.1002/asi.21359 · DOI
  36. Meyers, 2009, Making sense of an information world: The everyday life information behavior of preteens, The Library Quarterly, 79, 301, 10.1086/599125 · DOI
  37. Nardi, 1992, The use of scenarios in design, SIGCHI Bulletin, 24, 13, 10.1145/142167.142171 · DOI
  38. Pharo, 2008, The effect of granularity and order in XML element retrieval, Information Processing and Management, 44, 1732, 10.1016/j.ipm.2008.05.004 · DOI
  39. Rowley, 2007, Understanding student information behavior in relation to electronic information services: Lessons from longitudinal monitoring and evaluation, part 1, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 1162, 10.1002/asi.20593 · DOI
  40. Ruthven, 2003, Incorporating user search behavior into relevance feedback, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 529, 10.1002/asi.10240 · DOI
  41. Shah, 2010, Awareness in collaborative information seeking, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 1970, 10.1002/asi.21379 · DOI
  42. Solomon, 1994, Children, technology, and instruction: A case study of elementary school children using an online public access catalog (OPAC), School Library Media Quarterly, 23, 43
  43. Stefl-Mabry, 2003, A social judgment analysis of information source preference profiles: An exploratory study to empirically represent media selection patterns, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 879, 10.1002/asi.10285 · DOI
  44. Thatcher, 2008, Web search strategies: The influence of web experience and task type, Information Processing and Management, 44, 1308, 10.1016/j.ipm.2007.09.004 · DOI
  45. Urquhart, 1994, Nurses' information seeking skills and perceptions of information sources: Assessment using vignettes, Journal of Information Science, 20, 237, 10.1177/016555159402000402 · DOI
  46. Weber, 1992, Scenarios in business ethics research: Review, critical assessment, and recommendations, Business Ethics Quarterly, 2, 137, 10.2307/3857568 · DOI
  47. White, 2003, A task-oriented study on the influencing effects of query-biased summarisation in web searching, Information Processing and Management, 39, 707, 10.1016/S0306-4573(02)00033-X · DOI
  48. White, 2006, An implicit feedback approach for interactive information retrieval, Information Processing and Management, 42, 166, 10.1016/j.ipm.2004.08.010 · DOI
  49. White, 2007, Examining the effectiveness of real-time query expansion, Information Processing and Management, 43, 685, 10.1016/j.ipm.2006.06.005 · DOI
  50. White, 2006, A study of interface support mechanisms for interactive information retrieval, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 933, 10.1002/asi.20365 · DOI
  51. Williams, 2007, Teachers' approaches to finding and using research evidence: An information literacy perspective, Educational Research, 49, 185, 10.1080/00131880701369719 · DOI
  52. Wilmore, 2001, Scenario planning: Creating strategy for uncertain times, Information Outlook, 5, 22
  53. Xu, 2008, Order effect in relevance judgment, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 1264, 10.1002/asi.20826 · DOI
  54. Xu, 2008, Novelty and topicality in interactive information retrieval, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 201, 10.1002/asi.20709 · DOI
  55. Yuan, 2010, Evaluating an integrated system supporting multiple information-seeking strategies, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 1987, 10.1002/asi.21352 · DOI
  56. Zhang, 2012, The impact of task complexity on people's mental models of MedlinePlus, Information Processing and Management, 48, 107, 10.1016/j.ipm.2011.02.007 · DOI
  57. Zuccala, 2010, Open access and civic scientific information literacy, Information Research, 15

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kim, J.
Affiliations
University of North Texas (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Jeonghyun
Venue
Library & Information Science Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
300-307
ISSN
  • 0164-0763 (ISSN-L)
  • 0740-8188
DOI
10.1016/j.lisr.2012.04.002
OpenAlex
W1971740898
Cited by
25
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Library & Information Science Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
Keywords
scenarios, information seeking, information retrieval, scenario-based research, scenario development, research methodology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review