Cited by 0Counseling Practices and SupervisionSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 8 of the 61 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Examining Counselor Trainees’ Clinical Impressions of Pornography Use: Implications for Couple and Family Counselors

Open access
Flinchum, Matthew R., Bradley, Lorreta J., Noble, Nicole, Jung, Kwanghee·2026·The Family Journal

Abstract

Through a replication study of Gushue et al. and a fictional case example exploring pornography use, implicit bias against male sexual minority clients was explored among counselors-in-training. Participants ( n = 65) were recruited from master's-level counselor training programs to explore the differences in case conceptualization of a male client of different sexual orientations and expressions (straight, gay, bisexual, kink) seeking counseling at his partner's request following pornography use. Results indicated that participants rated “straight” Jaime as significantly more impaired and attributed his concerns more strongly to internal factors compared to the sexual minority conditions. The largest difference occurred between “straight Jaime “and “kink Jaime,” despite both being identified as heterosexual men. Additionally, participant age and the sexual orientation of the fictional client were also significantly associated with participants’ perceptions of the case. Implications for couples and family counselors are provided.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a vignette-based replication with 65 advanced counselor trainees, participants rated “straight” Jaime as significantly more impaired and attributed his pornography-related concerns more to internal factors than sexual minority or kink versions of the client. The largest difference was between “straight Jaime” and “kink Jaime,” despite both being identified as heterosexual men, and participant age also shaped clinical impressions.

Key findings

  • On the Initial Client Impression Inventory-Revised (ICII-R), the overall model by client sexual orientation was not significant, F(3, 61) = 1.875, p = .143, but planned contrasts showed “straight Jaime” differed significantly from “kink Jaime” (p < .05; Table 4 reports t = 2.16, p = .035, d = 0.77).
  • For locus of causality, the overall model was significant, F(3, 61) = 2.76, p = .049. Tukey HSD and planned contrasts both showed a significant “straight Jaime” versus “kink Jaime” difference (Tukey p = .028; planned contrast p = .006, t = −2.89, d = −1.03), with straight Jaime’s concerns seen as more internal.
  • Age was associated with ICII-R scores: overall model F(9, 64) = 3.49, p = .002; main effect for Age Range F(2, 64) = 7.21, p = .002; the 18–29 group differed from the 30–49 group (p = .004) and the 65+ group (p = .019). The CDS-II composite model with age was not significant, F(9, 64) = 1.14, p = .353.
  • For the Locus of Causality subscale, the overall model was significant, F(9, 64) = 2.66, p = .012, and there was a significant Age Range × Sexual Orientation interaction, F(9, 64) = 3.49, p = .013; post hoc comparison again showed “straight Jaime” versus “kink Jaime” differed significantly (p = .017). ICII-R scores were not significantly correlated with CDS-II composite scores but were indirectly correlated with Locus of Causality scores (r = −.363, p = .003).

Methods

  • Replication study using a fictional case vignette of “Jaime,” a 22-year-old White cisgender man seeking counseling at his partner’s request following pornography use. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four client conditions: straight, gay, bisexual, or kink Jaime.
  • Purposive sample of n = 65 advanced counselors-in-training (enrolled or eligible for internship) recruited from CACREP-accredited master’s-level counselor training programs via Qualtrics; 94 logged in, 93 consented, and 28 (30.1%) discontinued before completing surveys.
  • Measures were the 13-item ICII-R and the 12-item CDS-II, including the Locus of Causality subscale; analysis used the general linear model (GLM), planned contrasts, Tukey HSD post hoc tests, normality and correlation testing, and expectation-maximization imputation for missing data.

Limitations

  • The paper states that bias was examined only regarding sexual minority men; gender was not manipulated, and bias against sexual minority women or gender-expansive individuals was not considered.
  • The paper states the sample was minimal for between-group analysis, possibly limiting statistical power and external validity, and that vignette methodology may not accurately represent live clients or contextual factors.
  • The paper states recruitment challenges and incomplete responses complicated analysis and may have affected error rates; demographic data were withheld by some participants, and imputed demographics may differ from actual ones. Evident from Table 1: the sample was predominantly female (46/65, 70.8%), heterosexual (37/65, 56.9%), and White (43/65, 66.2%), with only 2 participants in the 65+ age category, which further limits generalizability.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/10664807261505019

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

7 tests recomputed · 0 with the reported and recomputed p on opposite sides of .05

Verification

Claims the paper makes

8 of 61 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Multiple researchers have reported observing differential evaluation of sexual minority clients and patients across multiple fields.

    “Multiple researchers reported observing differential evaluation of sexual minority clients and patients such as these in multiple fields (Donner & Lowry, 2013;Henriques-Calado et al., 2014;Kress et al., 2022;LaRoche et al., 2015;Televantos & Strauss, 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Donner & Lowry, 2013 source

      The Conclusions discuss anxiety disorders and gender identity in transgender people, while the References list a study of perceived discrimination and mental-health-service use. Neither passage reports differential evaluation of sexual minority clients or patients across fields. Searches for clinical evaluation, sexual orientation, and provider bias found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Henriques-Calado et al., 2014 source
    • cites Kress et al., 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingown data

    Participant age was significantly associated with participants' perceptions of the case.

    “Additionally, participant age and the sexual orientation of the fictional client were also significantly associated with participants' perceptions of the case.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Participants rated the 'straight' Jaime case as significantly more impaired compared to the sexual minority conditions.

    “Results indicated that participants rated”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Participants attributed the 'straight' Jaime case's concerns more strongly to internal factors compared to the sexual minority conditions.

    “Results indicated that participants rated”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The sexual orientation of the fictional client was significantly associated with participants' perceptions of the case.

    “Additionally, participant age and the sexual orientation of the fictional client were also significantly associated with participants' perceptions of the case.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 59
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 28
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence have created additional avenues for accessing and producing highly customizable pornographic content.

    “Pornography has become increasingly accessible since the advent of the internet (Cooper, 1998), but recent advances in generative artificial intelligence have created additional avenues for accessing and producing highly customizable pornographic content (Döring et al., 2025).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Döring et al., 2025 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Premisecitation

    Small adjustments to the overall study do not diminish the replicatory nature and value of the new scholarship.

    “Furthermore, they argued that small adjustments to the overall study do not diminish the replicatory nature and value of the new scholarship.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nosek and Errington (2020) source

      In “Replication redux,” the authors define replication by whether its outcomes test a prior claim, rather than by exact repetition of procedures. This supports the idea that adjustments need not disqualify a study as a replication. But “Replication resolved” explains that a seemingly small difference can matter: seasonal differences in frogs meant some attempted replications were not studying the same thing. The claim is too categorical in saying small adjustments do not diminish replicatory status. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The disconnect between pornography consumption and perceptions of pornography consumption can be divisive at the societal, relational, and individual levels.

    “This disconnect between pornography consumption and perceptions of pornography consumption can be divisive at the societal (Borgogna et al., 2022;Grubbs et al., 2019), relational (Maas et al., 2018;Perry, 2016Perry, , 2018)), and individual levels (Grubbs et al., 2018;Grubbs & Gola, 2019;Lewczuk et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Borgogna et al., 2022 source
    • cites Grubbs et al., 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Maas et al., 2018 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    By internalizing the standards, beliefs, and behaviors of the profession, differentiation from other helping professions crystallizes and a new self-concept emerges.

    “By internalizing the standards, beliefs, and behaviors of the profession, differentiation from other helping professions crystallizes, and a new self-concept emerges by which one could reasonably say,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Reiner et al., 2013 source

      The Role of Counselor Educators says educators acculturate students to the counseling profession’s identity and values, and Responsibility for Establishing Professional Identity discusses counselors’ distinctness among helping professions. The paper does not say that internalizing standards, beliefs, and behaviors causes that differentiation to crystallize or a new self-concept to emerge. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Evans et al. (2015) reviewed the limitations of using vignettes in research and methods for facilitating external validity of research findings.

    “They offered a thorough review of the limitations for the use of vignettes in research, as well as methods for facilitating external validity of the research findings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Evans et al. (2015) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    When properly addressed, such limitations can be minimized.

    “However, when properly addressed, such limitations can be minimized (Evans et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Evans et al., 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Critics of vignettes raised concerns regarding external validity related to the fictional nature of the vignette.

    “Critics of vignettes raised concerns regarding external validity related to the fictional nature of the vignette (Cullen, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cullen, 2010 source

      In “REALLY KNOWS ONLY BELIEVES” (page unavailable), Cullen criticizes invented, bizarre vignettes because they can confuse respondents when moved from philosophical discussion into surveys. The paper supports a concern about how vignette-based findings carry across contexts, but it does not identify the fictional nature of vignettes itself as the problem or explicitly frame the concern as external validity. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    The largest difference in ratings occurred between the 'straight Jaime' and 'kink Jaime' conditions, despite both being identified as heterosexual men.

    “The largest difference occurred between”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Within the current study, the missing item rate was >30%, while in contrast, the rate was <5% in the Gushue et al.'s (2022) study following the same methods.

    “Within the current study, the missing item rate was >30%, while in contrast, the rate was <5% in the Gushue et al.'s (2022) study following the same methods.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gushue et al.'s (2022) source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Respondents were more likely to not respond to all or part of the survey when Jaime was presented as a member of a sexual minority group, with the subgroup with the highest nonresponse rate being the 'kink Jaime' group.

    “Additionally, closer examination of the gaps in responses revealed that respondents were more likely to not respond to all or part of the survey when Jaime was presented as a member of a sexual minority group, with the subgroup with the highest nonresponse rate being the”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingown data

    Post hoc testing via Tukey's HSD aligned with the pairwise comparison for both age categories, p = .005 and p = .043, respectively.

    “Post hoc testing via Tukey's HSD aligned with the pairwise comparison for both age categories, p = .005and p = .043,respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Random assignment produced equivalent groups on relevant characteristics.
    • Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
    • Rests on an assumption: The four vignette conditions differ only in the client's sexual orientation/kink identity, with all other information held constant.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The most significant difference was between 'kink Jaime' and 'straight Jaime,' despite 'kink Jaime' being identified as a heterosexual man.

    “Unexpectedly, the most significant difference was between”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Pairwise comparisons of Age Range revealed significant differences between the 18-29 group and the 30-49 group (p = .004) and the 65+ group (p = .019) on ICII-R scores.

    “Moreover, pairwise comparisons of Age Range revealed significant differences between the 18-29 group and the 30-49 group (p = .004)and the 65 + group (p = .019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Random assignment produced equivalent groups on relevant characteristics.
    • Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
    • Rests on an assumption: The four vignette conditions differ only in the client's sexual orientation/kink identity, with all other information held constant.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    For 'kink Jaime,' his issue was seen as significantly more serious and simultaneously more external than 'straight Jaime.'

    “In other words, for”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The composite scores for the full data set had means and standard deviations of ICII-R M=43, SD=7.15; CDS-II M=60.37, SD=6.10; and Locus of Causality M=13.18, SD=3.78.

    “Before full analysis of the data using the GLM, normality testing was conducted on the composite scores for the full data set regarding the ICII-R (M = 43, SD = 7.15), the CDS-II (M = 60.37,SD = 6.10), and the Locus of Causality subscale of the CDS-II (M = 13.18,SD = 3.78).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The overall model for Hypothesis 2 was significant, F(3, 61) = 2.76, p = .049, leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis.

    “Contrary to the results from Hypothesis 1, the overall model was significant, F(3, 61) = 2.76, p = .049,leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Random assignment produced equivalent groups on relevant characteristics.
    • Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
    • Rests on an assumption: The four vignette conditions differ only in the client's sexual orientation/kink identity, with all other information held constant.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The results indicated that the age of the participant and the sexual orientation of the fictional client influenced counselor-in-training development.

    “The results indicated that the age of the participant and the sexual orientation of the fictional client influenced counselor-in-training development.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    No significant main effects were revealed in the Hypothesis 4 model, though the significance level for the vignette factor was notably close (p = .052).

    “No significant main effects were revealed, though the significance level for the vignette factor is notably close (p = .052).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Random assignment produced equivalent groups on relevant characteristics.
    • Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
    • Rests on an assumption: The four vignette conditions differ only in the client's sexual orientation/kink identity, with all other information held constant.
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Findingown data

    The 'kink Jaime' group did not significantly differ from the other sexual minority groups on locus of causality.

    “However, the”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Random assignment produced equivalent groups on relevant characteristics.
    • Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
    • Rests on an assumption: The four vignette conditions differ only in the client's sexual orientation/kink identity, with all other information held constant.
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Counselors' implicit assumptions about sexuality may shape their initial clinical impressions of clients presenting with concerns related to pornography use.

    “These challenges may be further compounded when working with clients from diverse sexual identity backgrounds, as counselors' implicit assumptions about sexuality may shape their initial clinical impressions of clients presenting with concerns related to pornography use.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Internship-stage counseling students have had the opportunity to address their biases via their own impetus or via remediation from their program.

    “and thus have had the opportunity to address their biases via their own impetus or via remediation from their program”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Internship-level counselors-in-training actively engage with the public as mental health practitioners and thus have the potential to do harm should their biases remain unaddressed.

    “Internship-level counselors-in-training actively engage with the public as mental health practitioners and thus have the potential to do harm should their biases remain unaddressed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Mental health trainees and new practitioners who conceptualized the African-American subject in Gushue et al.'s study applied different standards to him versus the White and East Asian subjects.

    “Moreover, Gushue et al. (2022) reported that mental health trainees and new practitioners who conceptualized the African-American subject in their study applied different standards to him versus the White and East Asian subjects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gushue et al. (2022) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    For individuals from marginalized groups, minimum standards are lower while the level of ability needed to demonstrate competence is higher.

    “Across multiple rounds of study, the authors noted that for individuals from marginalized groups, minimum standards were lower while the level of ability needed to demonstrate competence was higher (Biernat & Kobrynowicz, 1997;Kobrynowicz & Biernat, 1997).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Biernat & Kobrynowicz, 1997 source
    • cites Kobrynowicz & Biernat, 1997 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductown data

    Of the remaining 65 participants, 10 omitted the CDS-II and 8 withheld demographic data.

    “Of the remaining 65 participants, 10 omitted the CDS-II, and eight of the 65 withheld demographic data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Differences in counselors-in-training's clinical impressions of otherwise comparable fictional male clients may reflect a microaggression when sexual orientation contributes to the pathologizing, stereotyping, or invalidation of the client.

    “Specifically, differences in counselors-in-training's clinical impressions of otherwise comparable fictional male clients may reflect a microaggression when sexual orientation contributes to the pathologizing, stereotyping, or invalidation of the client.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductown data

    Of the 94 individuals, 93 affirmed consent and were randomly placed into one of four testing groups based on the fictional client's sexual orientation: straight, gay, bi, and kink.

    “Of those, 93 affirmed their consent to participate in the study and were then randomly placed into one of the four testing groups based on the fictional client's sexual orientation: (a)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Respondents to self-report measures may skew responses to meet social desirability expectations, misremember aspects being assessed, or the measures themselves may be ambiguous.

    “Respondents to self-report measures may intentionally or unintentionally skew their responses to meet social desirability expectations; they may misremember aspects being assessed, or the measures themselves may be ambiguous (Bauhoff, 2011;Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bauhoff, 2011 source
    • cites Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Unaddressed bias expressed by internship-level counselors-in-training has direct implications regarding the effectiveness of counselor training programs.

    “Unaddressed bias expressed by internship-level counselors-in-training has direct implications regarding the effectiveness of counselor training programs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Barrett and McWhirter (2002) reported significant differences in counselors-in-training's reported levels of homophobia and the number of unfavorable adjectives used to describe clients.

    “Similarly, Barrett and McWhirter (2002) reported significant differences in counselors-in-training's reported levels of homophobia and the number of unfavorable adjectives used to describe clients.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Barrett & McWhirter, 2002 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Given the specific and limited nature of the population of interest (internship-level counselors-in-training), utilizing purposive sampling facilitated generating a sufficient sample size for analysis.

    “Given the specific and limited nature of the population of interest, internship-level counselors-in-training, utilizing purposive sampling facilitated generating a sufficient sample size for analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Participants were randomly assigned to one of the four testing groups.

    “They were presented with informed consent documents for their review and acceptance before being randomly assigned to one of the four testing groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Normality testing was conducted on the composite scores for the full data set before full analysis using the GLM.

    “Before full analysis of the data using the GLM, normality testing was conducted on the composite scores for the full data set regarding the ICII-R (M = 43, SD = 7.15), the CDS-II (M = 60.37,SD = 6.10), and the Locus of Causality subscale of the CDS-II (M = 13.18,SD = 3.78).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Pornography has become increasingly accessible since the advent of the internet.

    “Pornography has become increasingly accessible since the advent of the internet (Cooper, 1998), but recent advances in generative artificial intelligence have created additional avenues for accessing and producing highly customizable pornographic content (Döring et al., 2025).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cooper, 1998 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The complexity of the case presented in a vignette should mirror the complexity of a case that could be experienced in real-world settings.

    “He argued that the complexity of the case presented in the vignette should mirror the complexity of a case which could be experienced in real-world settings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Taylor (2006)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Inclusion criteria required potential participants to be enrolled, or eligible to enroll, in the internship experience course at their respective institutions.

    “Regarding inclusion criteria, potential participants must have been enrolled, or eligible to enroll, in the internship experience course at their respective institutions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationcitation

    The shifting standards paradigm accurately predicts disparate evaluation criteria as they are used to assess individuals based on their minority or majority status.

    “In brief, the shifting standards paradigm appears to accurately predict disparate evaluation criteria as they are utilized to assess individuals based on their minority or majority status (Biernat et al., 1991).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Biernat et al., 1991 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Examining counselors-in-training's clinical impressions of fictional clients presenting with pornography use may provide insight into how their developing professional identities influence how they approach and respond to client presenting concerns.

    “Examining counselors-in-training's clinical impressions of fictional clients presenting with pornography use may provide insight into how their developing professional identities, including the integration of personal beliefs and professional expectations, influence how they approach and respond to client presenting concerns.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The ethical obligations and prescriptions established by various stakeholders formulate a key aspect of being a counselor.

    “The ethical obligations and prescriptions established by the various stakeholders do not exist within a vacuum; rather, they formulate a key aspect of being a counselor (Moss et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Moss et al., 2014 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Self-report measures face inherent challenges to face validity.

    “While various self-report measures are utilized within the counseling field to assess clients and practitioners alike, these measures face inherent challenges to face validity (Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The subjective nature of Likert-type scales manifests through altered understanding of the meaning of the construct being measured based on the perception of the subject.

    “Biernat and Kobrynowicz argued that the subjective nature of Likert-type scales manifests through altered understanding of the meaning of the construct being measured based on the perception of the subject.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Biernat & Kobrynowicz, 1997 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The ICII-R is a 13-item questionnaire that assesses participants' beliefs regarding their level of clinical concern, with lower composite scores indicating less clinical concern and higher scores indicating more clinical concern.

    “The ICII-R (Clarke, 2009;Gushue, 2004) is a 13-item questionnaire that reviews participant beliefs regarding their level of clinical concern.”
    • Also stated in: § Initial Client Impression Inventory-Revised. · plain
      “Lower composite scores indicate less overall clinical concern for the client, while higher scores indicate more clinical concern.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Clarke, 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Gushue, 2004 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The active practice of the Multicultural and Social Justice Counseling Competencies, the Code of Ethics, and relevant legal statutes while incorporating personal beliefs and values is at the heart of professional counseling identity.

    “The phenomenological experience of the active practice of the Multicultural and Social Justice Counseling Competencies (Ratts et al., 2016), the Code of Ethics (American Counseling Association [ACA], 2014), and the various legal statutes relevant to counselors while simultaneously incorporating the individual's personal beliefs and values is at the heart of professional counseling identity (Auxier”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ratts et al., 2016 source
    • cites American Counseling Association [ACA], 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Auxier et al., 2003 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The reviewed work on differential evaluation of sexual minority clients aligns with the Shifting Standards Paradigm, particularly regarding over- and misdiagnosis.

    “While not specifically cited by the aforementioned researchers, their work seems to align with the Shifting Standards Paradigm, particularly regarding over-and misdiagnosis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Expectation-maximization imputation was utilized to fill the missing data points for the 65 participants.

    “Expectation-maximization imputation was utilized to fill the missing data points for the 65 participants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductown data

    28 of the 93 participants (30.1%) elected to discontinue the survey prematurely.

    “In total, 28 of the 93 participants (30.1%) elected to discontinue the survey prematurely.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Vignettes can be used in research to assess decision-making along three axes: normative, descriptive, and prescriptive.

    “Taylor (2006) described and outlined the use of vignettes as a tool to be utilized in research to assess decision-making along three axes: normative, descriptive, and prescriptive.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Taylor (2006)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Pornography occupies a contested place within contemporary views of sexuality and sexual expression.

    “These prevalence rates illustrate the complex perceptions between actual pornography consumption and attitudes toward pornography, suggesting that pornography occupies a contested place within contemporary views of sexuality and sexual expression.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Regnerus et al., 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Evans & Corichi, 2026

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In the context of counseling, microaggression theory provides a framework for understanding the influence of implicit bias in counselors' perceptions of clients from different sexual minority groups.

    “In the context of counseling, the microaggression theory provides a framework for understanding the influence of implicit bias in counselors' perceptions of clients from different sexual minority groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The theoretical models and subsequent measurement scales of counseling identity development were conceptual in nature rather than practical.

    “The theoretical models (Auxier et al., 2003;Moss et al., 2014) and subsequent measurement scales (Woo & Henfield, 2015) were conceptual in nature rather than practical.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Auxier et al., 2003 source
    • cites Moss et al., 2014 source
    • cites Woo & Henfield, 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Presenting concerns involving pornography use, sexual expression, and sexual identity may intersect with the counselor-in-training's personal beliefs and assumptions.

    “This may be particularly relevant when presenting concerns involve pornography use, sexual expression, and sexual identity, which may intersect with the counselor-in-training's personal beliefs and assumptions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductown data

    A total of 94 individuals logged into the survey to review the informed consent documents.

    “From the recruitment efforts, a total of 94 individuals logged into the survey to review the informed consent documents via the survey link.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The CDS-II is a 12-item survey that assesses participants' conceptualization of the causal factors related to challenges in one's life, and contains four 3-item subscales: locus of causality, external control, stability, and personal control.

    “The CDS-II (McAuley et al., 1992) is a 12-item survey that assesses participants' conceptualization of the causal factors related to the challenges in one's life.”
    • Also stated in: § Causation Dimension Scale-II. · plain
      “The CDS-II contains four 3-item subscales: locus of causality, external control, stability, and personal control.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McAuley et al., 1992 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Couples and family counselors are increasingly likely to encounter concerns related to pornography use in clinical practice, due to the growing accessibility and prevalence of pornography use.

    “Due to the growing accessibility and prevalence of pornography use, couples and family counselors are increasingly likely to encounter concerns related to pornography use in clinical practice.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductown data

    The overall number of participants met the minimum standard for statistical power 0.8, as calculated using G*Power.

    “The overall number of participants met the minimum standard for statistical power 0.8, as calculated using G*Power.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Despite purposive sampling, challenges regarding participant recruitment became apparent.

    “Finally, despite purposive sampling, challenges regarding participant recruitment became apparent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationown data

    The results from the current study appear to indicate that counselors in training need differentiated instruction regarding their conceptualization of family related issues related to pornography use.

    “Ultimately, the results from the current study appear to indicate that counselors in training need differentiated instruction regarding their conceptualization of family related issues related to pornography use.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    The Multicultural & Social Justice Counseling Competencies and the effectiveness of CACREP-accredited counselor education programs to facilitate their incorporation into the professional identity of counselors-in-training were illuminated by the current study.

    “Moreover, the Multicultural & Social Justice Counseling Competencies (Ratts et al., 2016), and the effectiveness of CACREP-accredited counselor education programs to facilitate their incorporation into the professional identity of counselors-in-training, were illuminated by the current study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ratts et al., 2016 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The incomplete response rate complicated the analysis and may have significantly impacted the error rate.

    “However, the incomplete response rate complicated the analysis and may have significantly impacted the error rate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The small sample may have impacted the statistical power and external validity of the analysis.

    “The small sample may have impacted the statistical power and external validity of the analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Neither implicit bias against sexual minority women nor against gender-expansive individuals was taken into consideration.

    “As such, neither implicit bias against sexual minority women nor against gender-expansive individuals was taken into consideration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Previous research indicated that as students moved through their training programs, they expressed more alignment and congruency with the professional values of counseling.

    “Generally, previous research indicated that as students moved through their training programs, they expressed more alignment and congruency with the professional values of counseling (Moss et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Moss et al., 2014 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Code C.5. noted that counselors do not condone or engage in discrimination based on age, culture, disability, ethnicity, race, religion/spirituality, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, marital/partnership status, language preference, socioeconomic status, or immigration status or any basis proscribed by law.

    “Specifically, Code C.5. noted that”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Code C.5.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Moody and Lewis (2019) and Straub et al. (2018) reported psychosocial distress experienced by lesbian women as a result of microaggressions and bias, which manifest as symptoms closely correlated with posttraumatic stress.

    “Moody and Lewis (2019) and Straub et al. (2018) reported psychosocial distress experienced by lesbian women as a result of microaggressions and bias, which manifest as symptoms closely correlated with posttraumatic stress.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Moody and Lewis (2019) source
    • cites Straub et al. (2018) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Counselors work with clients within the ethical and legal codes to which they are beholden to facilitate progress toward the accomplishment of those goals.

    “Accordingly, counselors work with clients within the ethical and legal codes to which they are beholden to facilitate progress toward the accomplishment of those goals (Gladding, 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gladding, 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Several findings have direct implications for the theoretical understanding of how shifting standards play a significant role in client case conceptualization, and thus the professional identity development of counselors-in-training.

    “Several findings have direct implications for the theoretical understanding of how shifting standards play a significant role in client case conceptualization, and thus the professional identity development of counselors-in-training.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study investigated potential differences expressed by counselors-in-training toward sexual minority men, so sexual minority bias was only considered regarding men.

    “First, the study investigated potential differences expressed by counselors-in-training toward sexual minority men.Therefore, sexual minority bias was only considered regarding men.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    Inherent in the definition of counseling provided by Kaplan et al. (2014) is the notion that counselors provide services to diverse populations; thus, a degree of multicultural competency is fundamental to the professional identity of a counselor.

    “Inherent in the definition of counseling provided by Kaplan et al. (2014) is the notion that counselors provide services to diverse populations; thus, a degree of multicultural competency is fundamental to the professional identity of a counselor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kaplan et al. (2014) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Kaplan et al. (2014) noted that counseling is a professional relationship that empowers diverse individuals, families, and groups to accomplish mental health, wellness, education, and career goals.

    “Kaplan et al. (2014) noted that,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kaplan et al. (2014) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    By focusing on the practical application of professional counseling identity through case conceptualization, the current study moved beyond self-report measures such as the PISC or the LGB-KASH.

    “By focusing on the practical application of professional counseling identity (Gibson et al., 2010;Moss et al., 2014) through case conceptualization, the current study moved beyond selfreport measures such as the PISC (Woo & Henfield, 2015) or the Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Knowledge and Attitudes Scale for Heterosexuals (Worthington et al., 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gibson et al., 2010 source
    • cites Moss et al., 2014 source
    • cites Woo & Henfield, 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The vignette may not accurately represent conditions and contextual factors present with live clients.

    “Specifically, the vignette may not accurately represent conditions and contextual factors present with live clients (Kim, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kim, 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Prior research reported that clients who identify as members of a sexual minority population face microaggressions from their mental health practitioner.

    “Prior research in the field of microaggression theory as it pertains to counseling and mental health reported that clients who identify as members of a sexual minority population face microaggressions from their mental health practitioner (Goodrich et al., 2016;Quiñones et al., 2017;Televantos & Strauss, 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Goodrich et al., 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Quiñones et al., 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Televantos & Strauss, 2022 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The Multicultural and Social Justice Counseling Competencies provide further clarity and direction to this facet of counseling identity in terms of the knowledge, attitudes, and skills exemplified by culturally competent counselors.

    “Meanwhile, the Multicultural and Social Justice Counseling Competencies provide further clarity and direction to this facet of counseling identity in terms of the knowledge, attitudes, and skills exemplified by culturally competent counselors (Ratts et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ratts et al., 2016 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    While estimated utilizing appropriate statistical methodology (i.e., expectation-maximization), the actual demographics may have differed.

    “While estimated utilizing appropriate statistical methodology (i.e., expectation-maximization), the actual demographics may have differed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    As Woo et al. (2017) noted, the foundation of counselors' understanding of counselor professional identity is typically established through their counseling training, during which counselor educators assist them in developing a mature counseling identity.

    “As Woo et al. (2017) noted,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Woo et al. (2017) source
75 of 75
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Pornography use is a sexual issue that may arise in couple counseling and may be viewed differently by partners.

    “Among the sexual issues that may arise in couple counseling is pornography use, which may be viewed differently by partners.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Professional identity shapes how counselors integrate their personal beliefs and values with the ethical and professional expectations that guide their clinical judgment.

    “Professional identity shapes how counselors integrate their personal beliefs and values with the ethical and professional expectations that guide their clinical judgment.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Less is known about how counselors' developing professional identities may be reflected in their responses to clinical cases.

    “Although professional identity has been examined through theoretical models and self-report measures, less is known about how counselors' developing professional identities may be reflected in their responses to clinical cases.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The vignettes presented to the four groups are otherwise equivalent except for the fictional client's sexual orientation and associated pronoun usage, so any group differences in scores reflect responses to sexual orientation.

    “the sexual orientation of the fictional client changed along with subsequent pronoun usage for his fictional partner in each group as the core predictor variable of interest (i.e., heterosexual, gay, bisexual, kink identifying), was presented to the participants as follows.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Random assignment produced equivalent groups on relevant characteristics.

    “Of those, 93 affirmed their consent to participate in the study and were then randomly placed into one of the four testing groups based on the fictional client's sexual orientation: (a)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.

    “Expectation-maximization imputation was utilized to fill the missing data points for the 65 participants.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The four vignette conditions differ only in the client's sexual orientation/kink identity, with all other information held constant.

    “randomly placed into one of the four testing groups based on the fictional client's sexual orientation: (a)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The American Counseling Association released a draft of the 2026 update to the Code of Ethics in which they reinforced the notion of nondiscrimination as a core facet of counselor professional identity.

    “Moreover, the American Counseling Association (ACA) recently released a draft of the 2026 update to the Code of Ethics in which they reinforced the notion of nondiscrimination as a core facet of counselor professional identity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Case conceptualization is a vector through which bias toward sexual minority clients is expressed.

    “By focusing on a possible vector of bias, case conceptualization, this study built upon prior research.”
9 of 9

Statistics that don’t add up

Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.

  • Inconsistent p-value: F(9, 64) = 2.66, p = .012

    Minor

    The paper reports p = .012 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .011. The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.

    Reported p = .012 · recomputed p = .011

1 of 1

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Doesn’t add upF(9, 64) = 2.66reported p = .012 · recomputed p = .011

    “F(9, 64) = 2.66, p = .012”

  • ConsistentF(3, 61) = 1.875reported p = .143 · recomputed p = .143

    “F(3, 61) = 1.875, p = .143”

  • ConsistentF(3, 61) = 2.76reported p = .049 · recomputed p = .050

    “F(3, 61) = 2.76, p = .049”

  • ConsistentF(9, 64) = 3.49reported p = .002 · recomputed p = .001

    “F(9, 64) = 3.49, p = .002”

    The paper states a correction for multiple tests

  • ConsistentF(2, 64) = 7.21reported p = .002 · recomputed p = .002

    “F(2, 64) = 7.21, p = .002”

  • ConsistentF(9, 64) = 1.14reported p = .353 · recomputed p = .349

    “F(9, 64) = 1.14, p = .353”

    The paper states a correction for multiple tests

  • ConsistentF(9, 64) = 3.49reported p = .013 · recomputed p = .001

    “F(9, 64) = 3.49, p = .013”

    The paper states a correction for multiple tests

7 of 7

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Claim of greater impairment than all minority groups exceeds the reported contrasts

    Major

    The discussion describes straight Jaime as significantly more concerning than any sexual minority group. The results instead report a significant ICII-R contrast only with kink Jaime and say the hypothesis of differences from all groups was only partially supported.

  • Kink Jaime's concerns are described as both more and less serious

    Major

    The implications section says kink Jaime's issue was significantly more serious than straight Jaime's, whereas the discussion says participants viewed it as much less serious. These are opposite interpretations of the study's central comparison.

  • Locus-of-causality age model reports the wrong denominator degrees of freedom

    Minor

    The text reports F(9, 64) for the overall model, while Table 7 lists 55 error degrees of freedom. The reported 64 is the corrected-total degrees of freedom, not the F test's denominator degrees of freedom.

  • ICII-R age model reports the wrong denominator degrees of freedom

    Minor

    The text reports F(9, 64) for the overall ICII-R age model, but Table 6 gives the model's error degrees of freedom as 55. The F test's denominator degrees of freedom should therefore be 55, not 64.

  • Age-by-vignette interaction has the wrong reported degrees of freedom

    Minor

    The text reports F(9, 64) for the interaction. Table 7 assigns that interaction 4 degrees of freedom, not 9; its error row also gives 55 rather than 64 denominator degrees of freedom.

5 of 5

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Clarke C. P. (2009). Exploring the relationship between heterosexual therapists’ attitudes toward gay men their self-reported multicultural counseling competency and their initial clinical judgments (Publication No. 3386134) [Doctoral dissertation]. Columbia University. Proquest.
  2. Field A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM® SPSS® Statistics. Sage Publications, Inc.
  3. Gladding S. T. (2018). Counseling: A comprehensive profession (8th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
  4. Kaplan R. M., Saccuzzo D. P. (2018). Psychological testing (9th ed.). Cengage.
  5. Kress V. E., Shannonhouse L. R., Woloch C. M. (2022). Multicultural diagnosis and conceptualization. In Hays D. A., Erford B. T. (Eds.), Developing multicultural counseling competence: A systems approach (4th ed., pp. 633–670). Pearson.
  6. Stangor C. (2015). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  7. Sue D. W. (2010). Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender, and sexual orientation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Flinchum, M. R., Bradley, L. J., Noble, N., & Jung, K.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University – Central Texas (US)
  • Texas Tech University
  • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
  • Texas Tech University (US)
Corresponding author
Flinchum, Matthew R.
Venue
The Family Journal
Published
2026-11-05
ISSN
  • 1066-4807 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3950
OpenAlex
W7225322931
Cited by
0
References
61
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The Family Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Keywords
pornography use, counselor trainees, implicit bias, case formulation, attribution bias, internal vs external attribution, kinks, gay and bisexual men

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review