The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 8 of the 61 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Examining Counselor Trainees’ Clinical Impressions of Pornography Use: Implications for Couple and Family Counselors
Open accessAbstract
Through a replication study of Gushue et al. and a fictional case example exploring pornography use, implicit bias against male sexual minority clients was explored among counselors-in-training. Participants ( n = 65) were recruited from master's-level counselor training programs to explore the differences in case conceptualization of a male client of different sexual orientations and expressions (straight, gay, bisexual, kink) seeking counseling at his partner's request following pornography use. Results indicated that participants rated “straight” Jaime as significantly more impaired and attributed his concerns more strongly to internal factors compared to the sexual minority conditions. The largest difference occurred between “straight Jaime “and “kink Jaime,” despite both being identified as heterosexual men. Additionally, participant age and the sexual orientation of the fictional client were also significantly associated with participants’ perceptions of the case. Implications for couples and family counselors are provided.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a vignette-based replication with 65 advanced counselor trainees, participants rated “straight” Jaime as significantly more impaired and attributed his pornography-related concerns more to internal factors than sexual minority or kink versions of the client. The largest difference was between “straight Jaime” and “kink Jaime,” despite both being identified as heterosexual men, and participant age also shaped clinical impressions.
Key findings
- On the Initial Client Impression Inventory-Revised (ICII-R), the overall model by client sexual orientation was not significant, F(3, 61) = 1.875, p = .143, but planned contrasts showed “straight Jaime” differed significantly from “kink Jaime” (p < .05; Table 4 reports t = 2.16, p = .035, d = 0.77).
- For locus of causality, the overall model was significant, F(3, 61) = 2.76, p = .049. Tukey HSD and planned contrasts both showed a significant “straight Jaime” versus “kink Jaime” difference (Tukey p = .028; planned contrast p = .006, t = −2.89, d = −1.03), with straight Jaime’s concerns seen as more internal.
- Age was associated with ICII-R scores: overall model F(9, 64) = 3.49, p = .002; main effect for Age Range F(2, 64) = 7.21, p = .002; the 18–29 group differed from the 30–49 group (p = .004) and the 65+ group (p = .019). The CDS-II composite model with age was not significant, F(9, 64) = 1.14, p = .353.
- For the Locus of Causality subscale, the overall model was significant, F(9, 64) = 2.66, p = .012, and there was a significant Age Range × Sexual Orientation interaction, F(9, 64) = 3.49, p = .013; post hoc comparison again showed “straight Jaime” versus “kink Jaime” differed significantly (p = .017). ICII-R scores were not significantly correlated with CDS-II composite scores but were indirectly correlated with Locus of Causality scores (r = −.363, p = .003).
Methods
- Replication study using a fictional case vignette of “Jaime,” a 22-year-old White cisgender man seeking counseling at his partner’s request following pornography use. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four client conditions: straight, gay, bisexual, or kink Jaime.
- Purposive sample of n = 65 advanced counselors-in-training (enrolled or eligible for internship) recruited from CACREP-accredited master’s-level counselor training programs via Qualtrics; 94 logged in, 93 consented, and 28 (30.1%) discontinued before completing surveys.
- Measures were the 13-item ICII-R and the 12-item CDS-II, including the Locus of Causality subscale; analysis used the general linear model (GLM), planned contrasts, Tukey HSD post hoc tests, normality and correlation testing, and expectation-maximization imputation for missing data.
Limitations
- The paper states that bias was examined only regarding sexual minority men; gender was not manipulated, and bias against sexual minority women or gender-expansive individuals was not considered.
- The paper states the sample was minimal for between-group analysis, possibly limiting statistical power and external validity, and that vignette methodology may not accurately represent live clients or contextual factors.
- The paper states recruitment challenges and incomplete responses complicated analysis and may have affected error rates; demographic data were withheld by some participants, and imputed demographics may differ from actual ones. Evident from Table 1: the sample was predominantly female (46/65, 70.8%), heterosexual (37/65, 56.9%), and White (43/65, 66.2%), with only 2 participants in the 65+ age category, which further limits generalizability.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
8 of 61 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Multiple researchers have reported observing differential evaluation of sexual minority clients and patients across multiple fields.
“Multiple researchers reported observing differential evaluation of sexual minority clients and patients such as these in multiple fields (Donner & Lowry, 2013;Henriques-Calado et al., 2014;Kress et al., 2022;LaRoche et al., 2015;Televantos & Strauss, 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Donner & Lowry, 2013 source
The Conclusions discuss anxiety disorders and gender identity in transgender people, while the References list a study of perceived discrimination and mental-health-service use. Neither passage reports differential evaluation of sexual minority clients or patients across fields. Searches for clinical evaluation, sexual orientation, and provider bias found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Henriques-Calado et al., 2014 source
- cites Kress et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
Participant age was significantly associated with participants' perceptions of the case.
“Additionally, participant age and the sexual orientation of the fictional client were also significantly associated with participants' perceptions of the case.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Participants rated the 'straight' Jaime case as significantly more impaired compared to the sexual minority conditions.
“Results indicated that participants rated”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Participants attributed the 'straight' Jaime case's concerns more strongly to internal factors compared to the sexual minority conditions.
“Results indicated that participants rated”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The sexual orientation of the fictional client was significantly associated with participants' perceptions of the case.
“Additionally, participant age and the sexual orientation of the fictional client were also significantly associated with participants' perceptions of the case.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
The overall model for Hypothesis 1 failed to produce results that would lead to a rejection of the null hypothesis, F(3, 61) = 1.875, p = .143.
“Analysis for the overall model failed to produce results that would lead to a rejection of the null hypothesis, F(3, 61) = 1.875, p = .143.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Random assignment produced equivalent groups on relevant characteristics.
- Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
- Rests on an assumption: The four vignette conditions differ only in the client's sexual orientation/kink identity, with all other information held constant.
- Findingown data
A significant indirect correlation (r = -.363, p = .003) was found between ICII-R scores and scores on the Locus of Causality subscale of the CDS-II.
“However, a significant (p = .003)indirect correlation (r = -.363) was found between ICII-R scores and the scores on the Locus of Causality subscale of the CDS-II.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
- Findingown data
Post hoc comparisons within the Hypothesis 4 model indicated a significant difference between the 'straight Jaime' group and the 'kink Jaime' group (p = .017).
“Post hoc comparisons within this model again indicated a significant difference between the”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Random assignment produced equivalent groups on relevant characteristics.
- Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
- Rests on an assumption: The four vignette conditions differ only in the client's sexual orientation/kink identity, with all other information held constant.
- Findingown data
Post hoc testing using Tukey's HSD indicated a significant difference between the 'straight Jaime' and 'kink Jaime' groups (p = .028) on locus of causality.
“Post hoc testing utilizing the Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) test indicated a significant difference between the”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Random assignment produced equivalent groups on relevant characteristics.
- Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
- Rests on an assumption: The four vignette conditions differ only in the client's sexual orientation/kink identity, with all other information held constant.
- Findingown data
Participants conceptualized 'straight Jaime''s issues as more internal to himself than those of any of the sexual minority groups.
“In other words, they deemed”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When the composite score for the CDS-II was used as the criterion variable, the overall model was not significant, F(9, 64) = 1.14, p = .353.
“However, when the composite score for the CDS-II was used as the criterion variable, the overall model was not significant, F(9, 64) = 1.14, p = .353).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Random assignment produced equivalent groups on relevant characteristics.
- Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
- Rests on an assumption: The four vignette conditions differ only in the client's sexual orientation/kink identity, with all other information held constant.
- Findingown data
A significant interaction between Age Range and the Sexual Orientation of the fictional client variables was found, F(9, 64) = 3.49, p = .013.
“However, a significant interaction between Age Range and the Sexual Orientation of the fictional client variables was found, F(9, 64) = 3.49, p = .013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Random assignment produced equivalent groups on relevant characteristics.
- Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
- Rests on an assumption: The four vignette conditions differ only in the client's sexual orientation/kink identity, with all other information held constant.
- Findingown data
Planned contrasts indicated a significant difference (p = .006) between the 'straight Jaime' and 'kink Jaime' groups on locus of causality.
“Aligning with the Tukey's test, the planned contrasts indicated a significant difference (p = .006)between the”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Random assignment produced equivalent groups on relevant characteristics.
- Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
- Rests on an assumption: The four vignette conditions differ only in the client's sexual orientation/kink identity, with all other information held constant.
- Findingown data
Participants conceptualized 'straight Jaime' as significantly more impaired or otherwise concerning as a clinical case than any of the sexual minority groups.
“Within the current study, participants conceptualized”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A main effect was found for Age Range on ICII-R scores, F(2, 64) = 7.21, p = .002.
“A main effect was found for Age Range, F(2, 64) = 7.21, p = .002.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Random assignment produced equivalent groups on relevant characteristics.
- Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
- Rests on an assumption: The four vignette conditions differ only in the client's sexual orientation/kink identity, with all other information held constant.
- Findingown data
A significant contrast was found between the 'straight Jaime' and 'kink Jaime' groups (p < .05) on the ICII-R.
“Results from the planned contrasts indicated that hypothesis 1 was partially confirmed, as a significant contrast was found between the”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Random assignment produced equivalent groups on relevant characteristics.
- Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
- Rests on an assumption: The four vignette conditions differ only in the client's sexual orientation/kink identity, with all other information held constant.
- Findingown data
Participants appeared to underestimate or otherwise disregard Jaime's concerns when he identified as a man who engaged in kink-based sex.
“The participants in this study appeared to underestimate or otherwise disregard Jaime's concerns when he identified as a man who engaged in kink-based sex, raising serious questions as to the participants' exposure to, and comfort with, kink.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Generational divides regarding the straight and kink-oriented versions of the fictional case revealed significantly divergent attitudes and case analysis.
“More specifically, generational divides regarding the straight and kink-oriented versions of the fictional case revealed significantly divergent attitudes and case analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Results from both the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests indicated a failure to reject the null hypothesis for each of the three sets of data.
“Results from both the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk (Table 3) tests indicated a failure to reject the null hypothesis for each of the three sets of data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
- Findingown data
The ICII-R scores were not found to be significantly correlated with composite scores on the CDS-II.
“Regarding correlation testing, the ICII-R scores were not found to be significantly correlated with composite scores on the CDS-II.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
- Findingown data
The inclusion of age as a second predictor variable revealed the overall model with the ICII-R to be significant, F(9, 64) = 3.49, p = .002.
“The inclusion of age as a second predictor variable revealed the overall model with the ICII-R to be significant, F(9, 64) = 3.49, p = .002.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Random assignment produced equivalent groups on relevant characteristics.
- Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
- Rests on an assumption: The four vignette conditions differ only in the client's sexual orientation/kink identity, with all other information held constant.
- Findingown data
Results from the GLM indicated a significant overall model for Hypothesis 4, F(9, 64) = 2.66, p = .012.
“Results from the GLM indicated a significant overall model, F(9, 64) = 2.66, p = .012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Random assignment produced equivalent groups on relevant characteristics.
- Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
- Rests on an assumption: The four vignette conditions differ only in the client's sexual orientation/kink identity, with all other information held constant.
- Findingown data
Accounting for age differences revealed that the effects of the pathologizing of straight Jaime, especially among the youngest participants, were pronounced enough to shape the overall model across age groups.
“Additionally, accounting for age differences revealed that the effects of the pathologizing of straight Jaime, especially among the youngest participants, were pronounced enough to shape the overall model across age groups.”
- Also stated in: § Limitations · plain
“When age range was taken into consideration, these differences were large enough, particularly for the youngest group, to impact the overall model averaged across all age groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Limitations · plain
- Findingown data
When Jaime noted participating in kink-based sexual practices, participants conceptualized the issue as generally based in external factors and much less serious.
“In contrast, when Jaime noted participating in kink-based sexual practices, the participants conceptualized the issue as generally based in external factors and much less serious.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was insufficient evidence to support Hypothesis 1a.
“However, there was insufficient evidence to support hypothesis 1a.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Random assignment produced equivalent groups on relevant characteristics.
- Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
- Rests on an assumption: The four vignette conditions differ only in the client's sexual orientation/kink identity, with all other information held constant.
- Study design and conductcitation
A total sample of 65 participants was recruited using purposive sampling from master's-level counselor training programs accredited by CACREP.
“Using purposive sampling (Stangor, 2015), a total sample of n = 65 participants were recruited from master's-level counselor training programs that have been accredited through the CACREP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stangor, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Fictional clinical scenarios can provide insight into counselors-in-training's clinical perceptions and judgments.
“These studies demonstrate how fictional clinical scenarios can provide insight into counselors-in-training's clinical perceptions and judgments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The threshold to demonstrate sub-clinical or otherwise normative mental health would be higher for sexual minority group clients than for heteronormative counterparts.
“Moreover, the threshold to demonstrate sub-clinical or otherwise normative mental health would be higher for the sexual minority group clients versus their heteronormative counterparts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Despite small adjustments to the methodology used by Gushue et al. (2022), the current study generated new diagnostic evidence regarding the construct of implicit bias expressed by counselors-in-training toward a marginalized population.
“Thus, despite small adjustments to the methodology utilized by Gushue et al. (2022) in their research (e.g., one extra group, using sexual orientation as the variable of interest), the current study generated new diagnostic evidence regarding the construct of implicit bias expressed by counselors-in-training toward a marginalized population.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gushue et al. (2022) source
- Premisecitation
Many counselors may experience discomfort, especially with addressing sexual topics in counseling.
“Although counselors are expected to competently address sexual concerns in therapy, many counselors may experience discomfort, especially with addressing sexual topics in counseling (Hipp & Carlson, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hipp & Carlson, 2019 source
- Premisecitation
Counseling students at the internship stage of their training program have received most or all of their instruction.
“Counseling students at this stage of their training program have received most, or all, of their instruction (CACREP, 2024)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites CACREP, 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Prior research has used fictional case studies to assess how counselors-in-training conceptualize clients and the role gender bias plays in their conceptualization.
“Prior research has used fictional case studies to assess how counselors-in-training conceptualize clients and the role gender bias plays in their conceptualization (Seem & Johnson, 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Seem & Johnson, 1998 source
- Premisecitation
Counselor trainees at the internship level express a more thoroughly developed professional counseling identity than those entering their training.
“Moreover, counselor trainees at the internship level significantly express a more thoroughly developed professional counseling identity than those entering their training (Prosek & Hurt, 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Prosek & Hurt, 2014 source
- Interpretationown data
The data sets were presumed to be normally distributed.
“Thus, the data sets were presumed to be normally distributed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
- Interpretationown data
The practical application of counseling values and beliefs shifts significantly depending on the interaction of the client's identity and the identity of the practitioner.
“However, the practical application of those values and beliefs appears to shift significantly depending on the interaction of the client's identity and the identity of the practitioner.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
Variance in terms of the criterion variables was not measured in terms of the gender construct.
“Thus, variance in terms of the criterion variables was not measured in terms of this construct.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
Some participants withheld pieces of their demographic data.
“Additionally, some participants withheld pieces of their demographic data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
The research study included a minimal sample to assess differences between groups.
“Additionally, the research study included a minimal sample to assess differences between groups (Field, 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Field, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
Further evidence of participants' hesitancy to engage with the topic of pornography was found in the rate of missing data points from participants.
“Further evidence of participants' hesitancy to engage with the topic of pornography was found in the rate of missing data points from participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Higher levels of clinical concern reflected by higher scores on the ICII-R were significantly correlated with lower scores on the Locus of Causality subscale (i.e., the cause of the issue was internal to Jaime) and vice versa.
“Thus, higher levels of clinical concern reflected by higher scores on the ICII-R were significantly correlated with lower scores on the Locus of Causality subscale (i.e., the cause of the issue was internal to Jaime) and vice versa.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
- Study design and conductreasoning
The study did not address gender-based bias as a predictor variable more broadly, insofar as the gender of the subject in the fictional case vignette was not manipulated.
“Moreover, the study did not address gender-based bias as a predictor variable more broadly, insofar as the gender of the subject in the fictional case vignette was not manipulated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The participants' underestimation of kink Jaime's concerns raises serious questions about participants' exposure to, and comfort with, kink.
“The participants in this study appeared to underestimate or otherwise disregard Jaime's concerns when he identified as a man who engaged in kink-based sex, raising serious questions as to the participants' exposure to, and comfort with, kink.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Probably not a substantial claim. 59
- It may state two separate claims as one. 28
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationRecent advances in generative artificial intelligence have created additional avenues for accessing and producing highly customizable pornographic content.
“Pornography has become increasingly accessible since the advent of the internet (Cooper, 1998), but recent advances in generative artificial intelligence have created additional avenues for accessing and producing highly customizable pornographic content (Döring et al., 2025).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Döring et al., 2025 source
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
PremisecitationSmall adjustments to the overall study do not diminish the replicatory nature and value of the new scholarship.
“Furthermore, they argued that small adjustments to the overall study do not diminish the replicatory nature and value of the new scholarship.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Nosek and Errington (2020) source
In “Replication redux,” the authors define replication by whether its outcomes test a prior claim, rather than by exact repetition of procedures. This supports the idea that adjustments need not disqualify a study as a replication. But “Replication resolved” explains that a seemingly small difference can matter: seasonal differences in frogs meant some attempted replications were not studying the same thing. The claim is too categorical in saying small adjustments do not diminish replicatory status. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe disconnect between pornography consumption and perceptions of pornography consumption can be divisive at the societal, relational, and individual levels.
“This disconnect between pornography consumption and perceptions of pornography consumption can be divisive at the societal (Borgogna et al., 2022;Grubbs et al., 2019), relational (Maas et al., 2018;Perry, 2016Perry, , 2018)), and individual levels (Grubbs et al., 2018;Grubbs & Gola, 2019;Lewczuk et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationBy internalizing the standards, beliefs, and behaviors of the profession, differentiation from other helping professions crystallizes and a new self-concept emerges.
“By internalizing the standards, beliefs, and behaviors of the profession, differentiation from other helping professions crystallizes, and a new self-concept emerges by which one could reasonably say,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Reiner et al., 2013 source
The Role of Counselor Educators says educators acculturate students to the counseling profession’s identity and values, and Responsibility for Establishing Professional Identity discusses counselors’ distinctness among helping professions. The paper does not say that internalizing standards, beliefs, and behaviors causes that differentiation to crystallize or a new self-concept to emerge. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationEvans et al. (2015) reviewed the limitations of using vignettes in research and methods for facilitating external validity of research findings.
“They offered a thorough review of the limitations for the use of vignettes in research, as well as methods for facilitating external validity of the research findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Evans et al. (2015) source
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationWhen properly addressed, such limitations can be minimized.
“However, when properly addressed, such limitations can be minimized (Evans et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Evans et al., 2015 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationCritics of vignettes raised concerns regarding external validity related to the fictional nature of the vignette.
“Critics of vignettes raised concerns regarding external validity related to the fictional nature of the vignette (Cullen, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Cullen, 2010 source
In “REALLY KNOWS ONLY BELIEVES” (page unavailable), Cullen criticizes invented, bizarre vignettes because they can confuse respondents when moved from philosophical discussion into surveys. The paper supports a concern about how vignette-based findings carry across contexts, but it does not identify the fictional nature of vignettes itself as the problem or explicitly frame the concern as external validity. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe largest difference in ratings occurred between the 'straight Jaime' and 'kink Jaime' conditions, despite both being identified as heterosexual men.
“The largest difference occurred between”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataWithin the current study, the missing item rate was >30%, while in contrast, the rate was <5% in the Gushue et al.'s (2022) study following the same methods.
“Within the current study, the missing item rate was >30%, while in contrast, the rate was <5% in the Gushue et al.'s (2022) study following the same methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gushue et al.'s (2022) source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataRespondents were more likely to not respond to all or part of the survey when Jaime was presented as a member of a sexual minority group, with the subgroup with the highest nonresponse rate being the 'kink Jaime' group.
“Additionally, closer examination of the gaps in responses revealed that respondents were more likely to not respond to all or part of the survey when Jaime was presented as a member of a sexual minority group, with the subgroup with the highest nonresponse rate being the”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataPost hoc testing via Tukey's HSD aligned with the pairwise comparison for both age categories, p = .005 and p = .043, respectively.
“Post hoc testing via Tukey's HSD aligned with the pairwise comparison for both age categories, p = .005and p = .043,respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Random assignment produced equivalent groups on relevant characteristics.
- Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
- Rests on an assumption: The four vignette conditions differ only in the client's sexual orientation/kink identity, with all other information held constant.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe most significant difference was between 'kink Jaime' and 'straight Jaime,' despite 'kink Jaime' being identified as a heterosexual man.
“Unexpectedly, the most significant difference was between”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataPairwise comparisons of Age Range revealed significant differences between the 18-29 group and the 30-49 group (p = .004) and the 65+ group (p = .019) on ICII-R scores.
“Moreover, pairwise comparisons of Age Range revealed significant differences between the 18-29 group and the 30-49 group (p = .004)and the 65 + group (p = .019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Random assignment produced equivalent groups on relevant characteristics.
- Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
- Rests on an assumption: The four vignette conditions differ only in the client's sexual orientation/kink identity, with all other information held constant.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataFor 'kink Jaime,' his issue was seen as significantly more serious and simultaneously more external than 'straight Jaime.'
“In other words, for”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe composite scores for the full data set had means and standard deviations of ICII-R M=43, SD=7.15; CDS-II M=60.37, SD=6.10; and Locus of Causality M=13.18, SD=3.78.
“Before full analysis of the data using the GLM, normality testing was conducted on the composite scores for the full data set regarding the ICII-R (M = 43, SD = 7.15), the CDS-II (M = 60.37,SD = 6.10), and the Locus of Causality subscale of the CDS-II (M = 13.18,SD = 3.78).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe overall model for Hypothesis 2 was significant, F(3, 61) = 2.76, p = .049, leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis.
“Contrary to the results from Hypothesis 1, the overall model was significant, F(3, 61) = 2.76, p = .049,leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Random assignment produced equivalent groups on relevant characteristics.
- Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
- Rests on an assumption: The four vignette conditions differ only in the client's sexual orientation/kink identity, with all other information held constant.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe results indicated that the age of the participant and the sexual orientation of the fictional client influenced counselor-in-training development.
“The results indicated that the age of the participant and the sexual orientation of the fictional client influenced counselor-in-training development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataNo significant main effects were revealed in the Hypothesis 4 model, though the significance level for the vignette factor was notably close (p = .052).
“No significant main effects were revealed, though the significance level for the vignette factor is notably close (p = .052).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Random assignment produced equivalent groups on relevant characteristics.
- Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
- Rests on an assumption: The four vignette conditions differ only in the client's sexual orientation/kink identity, with all other information held constant.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingown dataThe 'kink Jaime' group did not significantly differ from the other sexual minority groups on locus of causality.
“However, the”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Random assignment produced equivalent groups on relevant characteristics.
- Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
- Rests on an assumption: The four vignette conditions differ only in the client's sexual orientation/kink identity, with all other information held constant.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
InterpretationreasoningCounselors' implicit assumptions about sexuality may shape their initial clinical impressions of clients presenting with concerns related to pornography use.
“These challenges may be further compounded when working with clients from diverse sexual identity backgrounds, as counselors' implicit assumptions about sexuality may shape their initial clinical impressions of clients presenting with concerns related to pornography use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningInternship-stage counseling students have had the opportunity to address their biases via their own impetus or via remediation from their program.
“and thus have had the opportunity to address their biases via their own impetus or via remediation from their program”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningInternship-level counselors-in-training actively engage with the public as mental health practitioners and thus have the potential to do harm should their biases remain unaddressed.
“Internship-level counselors-in-training actively engage with the public as mental health practitioners and thus have the potential to do harm should their biases remain unaddressed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationMental health trainees and new practitioners who conceptualized the African-American subject in Gushue et al.'s study applied different standards to him versus the White and East Asian subjects.
“Moreover, Gushue et al. (2022) reported that mental health trainees and new practitioners who conceptualized the African-American subject in their study applied different standards to him versus the White and East Asian subjects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gushue et al. (2022) source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationFor individuals from marginalized groups, minimum standards are lower while the level of ability needed to demonstrate competence is higher.
“Across multiple rounds of study, the authors noted that for individuals from marginalized groups, minimum standards were lower while the level of ability needed to demonstrate competence was higher (Biernat & Kobrynowicz, 1997;Kobrynowicz & Biernat, 1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductown dataOf the remaining 65 participants, 10 omitted the CDS-II and 8 withheld demographic data.
“Of the remaining 65 participants, 10 omitted the CDS-II, and eight of the 65 withheld demographic data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningDifferences in counselors-in-training's clinical impressions of otherwise comparable fictional male clients may reflect a microaggression when sexual orientation contributes to the pathologizing, stereotyping, or invalidation of the client.
“Specifically, differences in counselors-in-training's clinical impressions of otherwise comparable fictional male clients may reflect a microaggression when sexual orientation contributes to the pathologizing, stereotyping, or invalidation of the client.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductown dataOf the 94 individuals, 93 affirmed consent and were randomly placed into one of four testing groups based on the fictional client's sexual orientation: straight, gay, bi, and kink.
“Of those, 93 affirmed their consent to participate in the study and were then randomly placed into one of the four testing groups based on the fictional client's sexual orientation: (a)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationRespondents to self-report measures may skew responses to meet social desirability expectations, misremember aspects being assessed, or the measures themselves may be ambiguous.
“Respondents to self-report measures may intentionally or unintentionally skew their responses to meet social desirability expectations; they may misremember aspects being assessed, or the measures themselves may be ambiguous (Bauhoff, 2011;Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bauhoff, 2011 source
- cites Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
InterpretationreasoningUnaddressed bias expressed by internship-level counselors-in-training has direct implications regarding the effectiveness of counselor training programs.
“Unaddressed bias expressed by internship-level counselors-in-training has direct implications regarding the effectiveness of counselor training programs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationBarrett and McWhirter (2002) reported significant differences in counselors-in-training's reported levels of homophobia and the number of unfavorable adjectives used to describe clients.
“Similarly, Barrett and McWhirter (2002) reported significant differences in counselors-in-training's reported levels of homophobia and the number of unfavorable adjectives used to describe clients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Barrett & McWhirter, 2002 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductreasoningGiven the specific and limited nature of the population of interest (internship-level counselors-in-training), utilizing purposive sampling facilitated generating a sufficient sample size for analysis.
“Given the specific and limited nature of the population of interest, internship-level counselors-in-training, utilizing purposive sampling facilitated generating a sufficient sample size for analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataParticipants were randomly assigned to one of the four testing groups.
“They were presented with informed consent documents for their review and acceptance before being randomly assigned to one of the four testing groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataNormality testing was conducted on the composite scores for the full data set before full analysis using the GLM.
“Before full analysis of the data using the GLM, normality testing was conducted on the composite scores for the full data set regarding the ICII-R (M = 43, SD = 7.15), the CDS-II (M = 60.37,SD = 6.10), and the Locus of Causality subscale of the CDS-II (M = 13.18,SD = 3.78).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationPornography has become increasingly accessible since the advent of the internet.
“Pornography has become increasingly accessible since the advent of the internet (Cooper, 1998), but recent advances in generative artificial intelligence have created additional avenues for accessing and producing highly customizable pornographic content (Döring et al., 2025).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cooper, 1998 source
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe complexity of the case presented in a vignette should mirror the complexity of a case that could be experienced in real-world settings.
“He argued that the complexity of the case presented in the vignette should mirror the complexity of a case which could be experienced in real-world settings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Taylor (2006)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenInclusion criteria required potential participants to be enrolled, or eligible to enroll, in the internship experience course at their respective institutions.
“Regarding inclusion criteria, potential participants must have been enrolled, or eligible to enroll, in the internship experience course at their respective institutions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationcitationThe shifting standards paradigm accurately predicts disparate evaluation criteria as they are used to assess individuals based on their minority or majority status.
“In brief, the shifting standards paradigm appears to accurately predict disparate evaluation criteria as they are utilized to assess individuals based on their minority or majority status (Biernat et al., 1991).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Biernat et al., 1991 source
Probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningExamining counselors-in-training's clinical impressions of fictional clients presenting with pornography use may provide insight into how their developing professional identities influence how they approach and respond to client presenting concerns.
“Examining counselors-in-training's clinical impressions of fictional clients presenting with pornography use may provide insight into how their developing professional identities, including the integration of personal beliefs and professional expectations, influence how they approach and respond to client presenting concerns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe ethical obligations and prescriptions established by various stakeholders formulate a key aspect of being a counselor.
“The ethical obligations and prescriptions established by the various stakeholders do not exist within a vacuum; rather, they formulate a key aspect of being a counselor (Moss et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Moss et al., 2014 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationSelf-report measures face inherent challenges to face validity.
“While various self-report measures are utilized within the counseling field to assess clients and practitioners alike, these measures face inherent challenges to face validity (Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe subjective nature of Likert-type scales manifests through altered understanding of the meaning of the construct being measured based on the perception of the subject.
“Biernat and Kobrynowicz argued that the subjective nature of Likert-type scales manifests through altered understanding of the meaning of the construct being measured based on the perception of the subject.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Biernat & Kobrynowicz, 1997 source
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThe ICII-R is a 13-item questionnaire that assesses participants' beliefs regarding their level of clinical concern, with lower composite scores indicating less clinical concern and higher scores indicating more clinical concern.
“The ICII-R (Clarke, 2009;Gushue, 2004) is a 13-item questionnaire that reviews participant beliefs regarding their level of clinical concern.”
- Also stated in: § Initial Client Impression Inventory-Revised. · plain
“Lower composite scores indicate less overall clinical concern for the client, while higher scores indicate more clinical concern.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Clarke, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Gushue, 2004 source
- Also stated in: § Initial Client Impression Inventory-Revised. · plain
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe active practice of the Multicultural and Social Justice Counseling Competencies, the Code of Ethics, and relevant legal statutes while incorporating personal beliefs and values is at the heart of professional counseling identity.
“The phenomenological experience of the active practice of the Multicultural and Social Justice Counseling Competencies (Ratts et al., 2016), the Code of Ethics (American Counseling Association [ACA], 2014), and the various legal statutes relevant to counselors while simultaneously incorporating the individual's personal beliefs and values is at the heart of professional counseling identity (Auxier”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
InterpretationreasoningThe reviewed work on differential evaluation of sexual minority clients aligns with the Shifting Standards Paradigm, particularly regarding over- and misdiagnosis.
“While not specifically cited by the aforementioned researchers, their work seems to align with the Shifting Standards Paradigm, particularly regarding over-and misdiagnosis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenExpectation-maximization imputation was utilized to fill the missing data points for the 65 participants.
“Expectation-maximization imputation was utilized to fill the missing data points for the 65 participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductown data28 of the 93 participants (30.1%) elected to discontinue the survey prematurely.
“In total, 28 of the 93 participants (30.1%) elected to discontinue the survey prematurely.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationVignettes can be used in research to assess decision-making along three axes: normative, descriptive, and prescriptive.
“Taylor (2006) described and outlined the use of vignettes as a tool to be utilized in research to assess decision-making along three axes: normative, descriptive, and prescriptive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Taylor (2006)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningPornography occupies a contested place within contemporary views of sexuality and sexual expression.
“These prevalence rates illustrate the complex perceptions between actual pornography consumption and attitudes toward pornography, suggesting that pornography occupies a contested place within contemporary views of sexuality and sexual expression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Regnerus et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Evans & Corichi, 2026
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningIn the context of counseling, microaggression theory provides a framework for understanding the influence of implicit bias in counselors' perceptions of clients from different sexual minority groups.
“In the context of counseling, the microaggression theory provides a framework for understanding the influence of implicit bias in counselors' perceptions of clients from different sexual minority groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe theoretical models and subsequent measurement scales of counseling identity development were conceptual in nature rather than practical.
“The theoretical models (Auxier et al., 2003;Moss et al., 2014) and subsequent measurement scales (Woo & Henfield, 2015) were conceptual in nature rather than practical.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningPresenting concerns involving pornography use, sexual expression, and sexual identity may intersect with the counselor-in-training's personal beliefs and assumptions.
“This may be particularly relevant when presenting concerns involve pornography use, sexual expression, and sexual identity, which may intersect with the counselor-in-training's personal beliefs and assumptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductown dataA total of 94 individuals logged into the survey to review the informed consent documents.
“From the recruitment efforts, a total of 94 individuals logged into the survey to review the informed consent documents via the survey link.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThe CDS-II is a 12-item survey that assesses participants' conceptualization of the causal factors related to challenges in one's life, and contains four 3-item subscales: locus of causality, external control, stability, and personal control.
“The CDS-II (McAuley et al., 1992) is a 12-item survey that assesses participants' conceptualization of the causal factors related to the challenges in one's life.”
- Also stated in: § Causation Dimension Scale-II. · plain
“The CDS-II contains four 3-item subscales: locus of causality, external control, stability, and personal control.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McAuley et al., 1992 source
- Also stated in: § Causation Dimension Scale-II. · plain
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningCouples and family counselors are increasingly likely to encounter concerns related to pornography use in clinical practice, due to the growing accessibility and prevalence of pornography use.
“Due to the growing accessibility and prevalence of pornography use, couples and family counselors are increasingly likely to encounter concerns related to pornography use in clinical practice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductown dataThe overall number of participants met the minimum standard for statistical power 0.8, as calculated using G*Power.
“The overall number of participants met the minimum standard for statistical power 0.8, as calculated using G*Power.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenDespite purposive sampling, challenges regarding participant recruitment became apparent.
“Finally, despite purposive sampling, challenges regarding participant recruitment became apparent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
Interpretationown dataThe results from the current study appear to indicate that counselors in training need differentiated instruction regarding their conceptualization of family related issues related to pornography use.
“Ultimately, the results from the current study appear to indicate that counselors in training need differentiated instruction regarding their conceptualization of family related issues related to pornography use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataThe Multicultural & Social Justice Counseling Competencies and the effectiveness of CACREP-accredited counselor education programs to facilitate their incorporation into the professional identity of counselors-in-training were illuminated by the current study.
“Moreover, the Multicultural & Social Justice Counseling Competencies (Ratts et al., 2016), and the effectiveness of CACREP-accredited counselor education programs to facilitate their incorporation into the professional identity of counselors-in-training, were illuminated by the current study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ratts et al., 2016 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone givenThe incomplete response rate complicated the analysis and may have significantly impacted the error rate.
“However, the incomplete response rate complicated the analysis and may have significantly impacted the error rate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductreasoningThe small sample may have impacted the statistical power and external validity of the analysis.
“The small sample may have impacted the statistical power and external validity of the analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductreasoningNeither implicit bias against sexual minority women nor against gender-expansive individuals was taken into consideration.
“As such, neither implicit bias against sexual minority women nor against gender-expansive individuals was taken into consideration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationPrevious research indicated that as students moved through their training programs, they expressed more alignment and congruency with the professional values of counseling.
“Generally, previous research indicated that as students moved through their training programs, they expressed more alignment and congruency with the professional values of counseling (Moss et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Moss et al., 2014 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationCode C.5. noted that counselors do not condone or engage in discrimination based on age, culture, disability, ethnicity, race, religion/spirituality, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, marital/partnership status, language preference, socioeconomic status, or immigration status or any basis proscribed by law.
“Specifically, Code C.5. noted that”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Code C.5.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationMoody and Lewis (2019) and Straub et al. (2018) reported psychosocial distress experienced by lesbian women as a result of microaggressions and bias, which manifest as symptoms closely correlated with posttraumatic stress.
“Moody and Lewis (2019) and Straub et al. (2018) reported psychosocial distress experienced by lesbian women as a result of microaggressions and bias, which manifest as symptoms closely correlated with posttraumatic stress.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationCounselors work with clients within the ethical and legal codes to which they are beholden to facilitate progress toward the accomplishment of those goals.
“Accordingly, counselors work with clients within the ethical and legal codes to which they are beholden to facilitate progress toward the accomplishment of those goals (Gladding, 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gladding, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataSeveral findings have direct implications for the theoretical understanding of how shifting standards play a significant role in client case conceptualization, and thus the professional identity development of counselors-in-training.
“Several findings have direct implications for the theoretical understanding of how shifting standards play a significant role in client case conceptualization, and thus the professional identity development of counselors-in-training.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductreasoningThe study investigated potential differences expressed by counselors-in-training toward sexual minority men, so sexual minority bias was only considered regarding men.
“First, the study investigated potential differences expressed by counselors-in-training toward sexual minority men.Therefore, sexual minority bias was only considered regarding men.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationInherent in the definition of counseling provided by Kaplan et al. (2014) is the notion that counselors provide services to diverse populations; thus, a degree of multicultural competency is fundamental to the professional identity of a counselor.
“Inherent in the definition of counseling provided by Kaplan et al. (2014) is the notion that counselors provide services to diverse populations; thus, a degree of multicultural competency is fundamental to the professional identity of a counselor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kaplan et al. (2014) source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationKaplan et al. (2014) noted that counseling is a professional relationship that empowers diverse individuals, families, and groups to accomplish mental health, wellness, education, and career goals.
“Kaplan et al. (2014) noted that,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kaplan et al. (2014) source
Probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationBy focusing on the practical application of professional counseling identity through case conceptualization, the current study moved beyond self-report measures such as the PISC or the LGB-KASH.
“By focusing on the practical application of professional counseling identity (Gibson et al., 2010;Moss et al., 2014) through case conceptualization, the current study moved beyond selfreport measures such as the PISC (Woo & Henfield, 2015) or the Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Knowledge and Attitudes Scale for Heterosexuals (Worthington et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe vignette may not accurately represent conditions and contextual factors present with live clients.
“Specifically, the vignette may not accurately represent conditions and contextual factors present with live clients (Kim, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kim, 2012 source
Probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPrior research reported that clients who identify as members of a sexual minority population face microaggressions from their mental health practitioner.
“Prior research in the field of microaggression theory as it pertains to counseling and mental health reported that clients who identify as members of a sexual minority population face microaggressions from their mental health practitioner (Goodrich et al., 2016;Quiñones et al., 2017;Televantos & Strauss, 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Goodrich et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Quiñones et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Televantos & Strauss, 2022 source
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe Multicultural and Social Justice Counseling Competencies provide further clarity and direction to this facet of counseling identity in terms of the knowledge, attitudes, and skills exemplified by culturally competent counselors.
“Meanwhile, the Multicultural and Social Justice Counseling Competencies provide further clarity and direction to this facet of counseling identity in terms of the knowledge, attitudes, and skills exemplified by culturally competent counselors (Ratts et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ratts et al., 2016 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductreasoningWhile estimated utilizing appropriate statistical methodology (i.e., expectation-maximization), the actual demographics may have differed.
“While estimated utilizing appropriate statistical methodology (i.e., expectation-maximization), the actual demographics may have differed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationAs Woo et al. (2017) noted, the foundation of counselors' understanding of counselor professional identity is typically established through their counseling training, during which counselor educators assist them in developing a mature counseling identity.
“As Woo et al. (2017) noted,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Woo et al. (2017) source
The paper relies on this without support.
Pornography use is a sexual issue that may arise in couple counseling and may be viewed differently by partners.
“Among the sexual issues that may arise in couple counseling is pornography use, which may be viewed differently by partners.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Professional identity shapes how counselors integrate their personal beliefs and values with the ethical and professional expectations that guide their clinical judgment.
“Professional identity shapes how counselors integrate their personal beliefs and values with the ethical and professional expectations that guide their clinical judgment.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Less is known about how counselors' developing professional identities may be reflected in their responses to clinical cases.
“Although professional identity has been examined through theoretical models and self-report measures, less is known about how counselors' developing professional identities may be reflected in their responses to clinical cases.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The vignettes presented to the four groups are otherwise equivalent except for the fictional client's sexual orientation and associated pronoun usage, so any group differences in scores reflect responses to sexual orientation.
“the sexual orientation of the fictional client changed along with subsequent pronoun usage for his fictional partner in each group as the core predictor variable of interest (i.e., heterosexual, gay, bisexual, kink identifying), was presented to the participants as follows.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Random assignment produced equivalent groups on relevant characteristics.
“Of those, 93 affirmed their consent to participate in the study and were then randomly placed into one of the four testing groups based on the fictional client's sexual orientation: (a)”
The paper relies on this without support.
Expectation-maximization imputation adequately handles missing data without introducing bias.
“Expectation-maximization imputation was utilized to fill the missing data points for the 65 participants.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The four vignette conditions differ only in the client's sexual orientation/kink identity, with all other information held constant.
“randomly placed into one of the four testing groups based on the fictional client's sexual orientation: (a)”
The paper relies on this without support.
The American Counseling Association released a draft of the 2026 update to the Code of Ethics in which they reinforced the notion of nondiscrimination as a core facet of counselor professional identity.
“Moreover, the American Counseling Association (ACA) recently released a draft of the 2026 update to the Code of Ethics in which they reinforced the notion of nondiscrimination as a core facet of counselor professional identity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Case conceptualization is a vector through which bias toward sexual minority clients is expressed.
“By focusing on a possible vector of bias, case conceptualization, this study built upon prior research.”
Statistics that don’t add up
Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.
Inconsistent p-value: F(9, 64) = 2.66, p = .012
MinorThe paper reports p = .012 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .011. The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.
Reported p = .012 · recomputed p = .011
“F(9, 64) = 2.66, p = .012”
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Doesn’t add upF(9, 64) = 2.66reported p = .012 · recomputed p = .011
“F(9, 64) = 2.66, p = .012”
- ConsistentF(3, 61) = 1.875reported p = .143 · recomputed p = .143
“F(3, 61) = 1.875, p = .143”
- ConsistentF(3, 61) = 2.76reported p = .049 · recomputed p = .050
“F(3, 61) = 2.76, p = .049”
- ConsistentF(9, 64) = 3.49reported p = .002 · recomputed p = .001
“F(9, 64) = 3.49, p = .002”
The paper states a correction for multiple tests
- ConsistentF(2, 64) = 7.21reported p = .002 · recomputed p = .002
“F(2, 64) = 7.21, p = .002”
- ConsistentF(9, 64) = 1.14reported p = .353 · recomputed p = .349
“F(9, 64) = 1.14, p = .353”
The paper states a correction for multiple tests
- ConsistentF(9, 64) = 3.49reported p = .013 · recomputed p = .001
“F(9, 64) = 3.49, p = .013”
The paper states a correction for multiple tests
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Claim of greater impairment than all minority groups exceeds the reported contrasts
MajorThe discussion describes straight Jaime as significantly more concerning than any sexual minority group. The results instead report a significant ICII-R contrast only with kink Jaime and say the hypothesis of differences from all groups was only partially supported.
“Within the current study, participants conceptualized "straight Jaime" as significantly more impaired or otherwise concerning as a clinical case, and whose issue or issues were more internal to himself than any of the sexual minority groups.”
“Results from the planned contrasts indicated that hypothesis 1 was partially confirmed, as a significant contrast was found between the "straight Jaime" and "kink Jaime" groups (p < .05).”
Kink Jaime's concerns are described as both more and less serious
MajorThe implications section says kink Jaime's issue was significantly more serious than straight Jaime's, whereas the discussion says participants viewed it as much less serious. These are opposite interpretations of the study's central comparison.
“In other words, for "kink Jaime," his issue was seen as significantly more serious and simultaneously more external than "straight Jaime."”
“In contrast, when Jaime noted participating in kink-based sexual practices, the participants conceptualized the issue as generally based in external factors and much less serious.”
Locus-of-causality age model reports the wrong denominator degrees of freedom
MinorThe text reports F(9, 64) for the overall model, while Table 7 lists 55 error degrees of freedom. The reported 64 is the corrected-total degrees of freedom, not the F test's denominator degrees of freedom.
“F(9, 64) = 2.66, p = .012)”
“| Error | 638.48 55 | 11.61 | | | | |”
ICII-R age model reports the wrong denominator degrees of freedom
MinorThe text reports F(9, 64) for the overall ICII-R age model, but Table 6 gives the model's error degrees of freedom as 55. The F test's denominator degrees of freedom should therefore be 55, not 64.
“F(9, 64) = 3.49, p = .002.”
“| Error | 2,085.29 | 55 | 37.91 | | | |”
Age-by-vignette interaction has the wrong reported degrees of freedom
MinorThe text reports F(9, 64) for the interaction. Table 7 assigns that interaction 4 degrees of freedom, not 9; its error row also gives 55 rather than 64 denominator degrees of freedom.
“F(9, 64) = 3.49, p = .013)”
“| Age Range × | 162.04 | 4 | 40.51 | 3.49 | 0.013 0.202 | |”
Citations
Cites
Multicultural and Social Justice Counseling Competencies: Guidelines for the Counseling Profession
Ratts, M. J., Singh, A. A., Nassar‐McMillan, S., Butler, S. K., & McCullough, J. R. (2016) · Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development · doi:10.1002/jmcd.12035 · Cited by 1,430
Evans, S. C., Roberts, M. C., Keeley, J. W., Blossom, J. B., Amaro, C. M., Garcia, A. M., Stough, C. O., Canter, K. S., Robles, R., & Reed, G. M. (2015) · International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.ijchp.2014.12.001 · Cited by 757
Sue, D. W., Alsaidi, S., Awad, M. N., Glaeser, E., Calle, C. Z., & Mendez, N. (2019) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000296 · Cited by 752
Sexuality and the Internet: Surfing into the New Millennium
COOPER, A. (1998) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.1998.1.187 · Cited by 736
Measuring Causal Attributions: The Revised Causal Dimension Scale (CDSII)
McAuley, E., Duncan, T. E., & Russell, D. W. (1992) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167292185006 · Cited by 596
Nadal, K. L. Y., Whitman, C. N., Davis, L. S., Erazo, T., & Davidoff, K. C. (2016) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2016.1142495 · Cited by 571
Weinfield, N. S., Sroufe, L. A., & Egeland, B. (2000) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00178 · Cited by 570
Biernat, M., & Kobrynowicz, D. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.544 · Cited by 537
An Experiment in Racism: TV Commercials
Pierce, C. M., Carew, J. V., Pierce-Gonzalez, D., & Wills, D. (1977) · Education and Urban Society · doi:10.1177/001312457701000105 · Cited by 496
Stereotypes and standards of judgment.
Biernat, M., Manis, M., & Nelson, T. E. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.485 · Cited by 449
Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691 · Cited by 444
Grubbs, J. B., Perry, S. L., Wilt, J. A., & Reid, R. C. (2019) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-018-1248-x · Cited by 394
Sex differences in anxiety and emotional behavior
Donner, N. C., & Lowry, C. A. (2013) · Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00424-013-1271-7 · Cited by 379
Factorial Surveys: Using Vignettes to Study Professional Judgement
Taylor, B. J. (2005) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch345 · Cited by 357
20/20: A Vision for the Future of Counseling: The New Consensus Definition of Counseling
Kaplan, D. M., Tarvydas, V. M., & Gladding, S. T. (2014) · Journal of Counseling & Development · doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.2014.00164.x · Cited by 338
Professional Identity Development: A Grounded Theory of Transformational Tasks of New Counselors
Gibson, D. M., Dollarhide, C. T., & Moss, J. M. (2010) · Counselor Education and Supervision · doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.2010.tb00106.x · Cited by 330
Professional Identity Development: A Grounded Theory of Transformational Tasks of Counselors
Moss, J. M., Gibson, D. M., & Dollarhide, C. T. (2014) · Journal of Counseling & Development · doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.2014.00124.x · Cited by 236
Documenting Pornography Use in America: A Comparative Analysis of Methodological Approaches
Regnerus, M., Gordon, D., & Price, J. (2015) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2015.1096886 · Cited by 231
Cullen, S. (2010) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-009-0016-1 · Cited by 225
Effect of Therapist Color-Blindness on Empathy and Attributions in Cross-Cultural Counseling.
Burkard, A. W., & Knox, S. (2004) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.4.387 · Cited by 201
Shifting Standards: How Voters Evaluate the Qualifications of Female and Male Candidates
Bauer, N. M. (2019) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/705817 · Cited by 198
Identity Development in Counselors‐in‐Training
Auxier, C. R., Hughes, F. R., & Kline, W. B. (2003) · Counselor Education and Supervision · doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.2003.tb01827.x · Cited by 172
Gendered Racial Microaggressions and Traumatic Stress Symptoms Among Black Women
Moody, A. T., & Lewis, J. A. (2019) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0361684319828288 · Cited by 161
Worthington, R. L., Dillon, F. R., & Becker-Schutte, A. M. (2005) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.1.104 · Cited by 151
From Bad to Worse? Pornography Consumption, Spousal Religiosity, Gender, and Marital Quality
Perry, S. L. (2016) · Sociological Forum · doi:10.1111/socf.12252 · Cited by 151
Decoding Subjective Evaluations: How Stereotypes Provide Shifting Standards
Kobrynowicz, D., & Biernat, M. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1997.1338 · Cited by 138
Bauhoff, S. (2011) · Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology · doi:10.1007/s10742-011-0069-3 · Cited by 136
Evaluating Pornography Problems Due to Moral Incongruence Model
Lewczuk, K., Glica, A., Nowakowska, I., Gola, M. K., & Grubbs, J. B. (2019) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.11.259 · Cited by 127
Gushue, G. V. (2004) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.4.398 · Cited by 99
Grubbs, J. B., & Gola, M. K. (2019) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.11.004 · Cited by 94
Campbell, D. T., Lewis, N. A., & Hunt, W. A. (1958) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0045310 · Cited by 93
Singh, A. A., Nassar‐McMillan, S. C., Arredondo, P. M., & Toporek, R. L. (2020) · Journal of Counseling & Development · doi:10.1002/jcad.12319 · Cited by 85
Maas, M. K., Vasilenko, S. A., & Willoughby, B. J. (2018) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2018.1440281 · Cited by 83
Measuring Professional Identity Development Among Counselor Trainees
Prosek, E. A., & Hurt, K. M. (2014) · Counselor Education and Supervision · doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.2014.00063.x · Cited by 69
Pornography Consumption and Cognitive-Affective Distress
Privara, M., & Bob, P. (2023) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/nmd.0000000000001669 · Cited by 67
Perceived Impact of Professional Counselor Identity: An Exploratory Study
Reiner, S. M., Dobmeier, R. A., & Hernández, T. J. (2013) · Journal of Counseling & Development · doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.2013.00084.x · Cited by 66
Borgogna, N. C., Griffin, K. R., Grubbs, J. B., & Kraus, S. W. (2022) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.05.144 · Cited by 65
Professional Identity Scale in Counseling (PISC): Instrument Development and Validation
Woo, H., & Henfield, M. S. (2015) · Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy · doi:10.1080/2326716x.2015.1040557 · Cited by 62
Straub, K. T., McConnell, A. A., & Messman-Moore, T. L. (2018) · Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity · doi:10.1037/sgd0000263 · Cited by 61
Counselor Trainees' Perceptions of Clients Based on Client Sexual Orientation
Barrett, K. A., & McWhirter, B. T. (2002) · Counselor Education and Supervision · doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.2002.tb01285.x · Cited by 58
Grubbs, J. B., Weinandy, J. T. G., & Engelman, J. (2018) · Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity The Journal of Treatment and Prevention · doi:10.1080/10720162.2019.1565848 · Cited by 58
Professional Identity Development in Counseling Professionals
Woo, H., Lu, J., Harris, C., & Cauley, B. (2017) · Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/03054985.2017.1297184 · Cited by 52
Sexual minority reflections on their psychotherapy experiences
Quiñones, T. J., Woodward, E. N., & Pantalone, D. W. (2015) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2015.1090035 · Cited by 44
A cultural examination of the DSM-5: Research and clinical implications for cultural minorities.
Roche, M. J. L., Fuentes, M. A., & Hinton, D. E. (2015) · Professional Psychology Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0039278 · Cited by 40
Pornography use and marital quality: Testing the moral incongruence hypothesis
Perry, S. L. (2018) · Personal Relationships · doi:10.1111/pere.12234 · Cited by 36
Male Adolescents and Contemporary Pornography
Bloom, Z. D., & Hagedorn, W. B. (2014) · The Family Journal · doi:10.1177/1066480714555672 · Cited by 31
Gender Bias Among Counseling Trainees: A Study of Case Conceptualization
SEEM, S. R., & JOHNSON, E. (1998) · Counselor Education and Supervision · doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.1998.tb00549.x · Cited by 30
What Motives Drive Pornography Use?
Esplin, C. R., Hatch, S., Hatch, H. D., Deichman, C. L., & Braithwaite, S. R. (2020) · The Family Journal · doi:10.1177/1066480720956640 · Cited by 30
Kim, J. (2012) · Library & Information Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2012.04.002 · Cited by 25
Goodrich, K. M., Buser, J. K., Luke, M. M., & Buser, T. J. (2015) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1080/00918369.2015.1112192 · Cited by 23
Addressing sexual issues in couples seeking relationship therapy
Emond, M., Byers, E. S., Brassard, A., Tremblay, N., & Péloquin, K. (2021) · Sexual & Relationship Therapy · doi:10.1080/14681994.2021.1969546 · Cited by 21
Professional Identity Development of Foreign-Born Counselors in U.S. Counselor Education
Attia, M. (2021) · International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling · doi:10.1007/s10447-020-09419-5 · Cited by 19
Bloom, Z. D., Gutiérrez, D., Lambie, G. W., & Ali, S. (2016) · Journal of Mental Health Counseling · doi:10.17744/mehc.38.4.04 · Cited by 15
Experiences with AI-Generated Pornography: A Quantitative Content Analysis of Reddit Posts
Döring, N., Le, T. D., & Miller, D. J. (2025) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-025-03227-x · Cited by 15
Pornography Use and Sexual Objectification of Others
Bridges, A. J., Willis, M., Ezzell, M. B., Sun, C.-F., Johnson, J. A., & Wright, P. J. (2023) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/10778012231207041 · Cited by 12
Counselor Professional Identity Development in CACREP and Non-CACREP Accredited Programs
Person, M., Garner, C. M., Ghoston, M. R., & Petersen, C. M. (2020) · Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision · doi:10.7729/131.1335 · Cited by 11
Comfort in Treating Sexual Problems: Current Training and Counselor Self-Efficacy
Hipp, C. J., & Carlson, R. G. (2019) · The Family Journal · doi:10.1177/1066480719835342 · Cited by 10
Nishen, A. K., Corcoran, K., Holder, K., & Kessels, U. (2022) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-021-00595-5 · Cited by 10
Televantos, M., & Strauss, S. M. (2022) · Counselling and Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/capr.12562 · Cited by 7
Racial triangulation and shifting standards in mental health assessments
Gushue, G. V., Lee, T. R., & Kim, J. E. (2022) · Journal of Counseling & Development · doi:10.1002/jcad.12420 · Cited by 6
Henriques-Calado, J., Duarte-Silva, M. E., Campos, R. C., Junqueira, D., Sacoto, C., & Keong, A. M. (2014) · Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic · doi:10.1521/bumc.2014.78.4.283 · Cited by 2
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Clarke C. P. (2009). Exploring the relationship between heterosexual therapists’ attitudes toward gay men their self-reported multicultural counseling competency and their initial clinical judgments (Publication No. 3386134) [Doctoral dissertation]. Columbia University. Proquest.
- Field A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM® SPSS® Statistics. Sage Publications, Inc.
- Gladding S. T. (2018). Counseling: A comprehensive profession (8th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
- Kaplan R. M., Saccuzzo D. P. (2018). Psychological testing (9th ed.). Cengage.
- Kress V. E., Shannonhouse L. R., Woloch C. M. (2022). Multicultural diagnosis and conceptualization. In Hays D. A., Erford B. T. (Eds.), Developing multicultural counseling competence: A systems approach (4th ed., pp. 633–670). Pearson.
- Stangor C. (2015). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.
- Sue D. W. (2010). Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender, and sexual orientation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Cited by
Still being checked.
Metadata
- Authors
- Flinchum, M. R., Bradley, L. J., Noble, N., & Jung, K.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University – Central Texas (US)
- Texas Tech University
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
- Texas Tech University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Flinchum, Matthew R.
- Venue
- The Family Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2026-11-05
- ISSN
- 1066-4807 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3950
- OpenAlex
- W7225322931
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Family Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Keywords
- pornography use, counselor trainees, implicit bias, case formulation, attribution bias, internal vs external attribution, kinks, gay and bisexual men
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review