Do citizens and farmers interpret the concept of farm animal welfare differently?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A social movement has led to increased public concern and interest in the welfare of animals in captivity.
“Although personal and community views vary worldwide, it is well recognized that there is a social movement emerging that has led to increased public concern and interest in the welfare of animals in captivity [1,2,3,4,5].”
From The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [5]
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare
Sherwen, S. L., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9060366 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Risk factors associated with mortality at a milk-fed veal calf facility: A prospective cohort study
Renaud, D. L., Duffield, T. F., LeBlanc, S. J., Ferguson, S., Haley, D. B., & Kelton, D. F. (2018) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13581 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
An animal welfare risk assessment process for zoos
Sherwen, S. L., Hemsworth, L. M., Beausoleil, N. J., Embury, A., & Mellor, D. J. (2018) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani8080130 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., Van Poucke, E., & Tuyttens, F. A. M.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Vanhonacker, Filiep
- Venue
- Livestock Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 126-136
- ISSN
- 1871-1413 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008615988
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 8.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Livestock Science (publishedVersion)
- WBI Studies Repository (submittedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Animal Law and Welfare
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
- Keywords
- livestock welfare, citizen perceptions, farmer perceptions, perception gap, natural behavior, space availability, welfare ranking, animal husbandry, Flanders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
