Cited by 5EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsArtificial Intelligence in Education

Self-regulated learning in ai-supported language learning: A self-determination theory perspective on critical thinking, teacher support, and flow

Zhao, Yang, Jin, Huiyi·2026·Learning and Motivation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lmot.2026.102299

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Metacognitive and self-regulatory processes play an important role in enabling students to resist cognitive tendencies and engage in deliberate evaluation.

    “From a learning perspective, metacognitive and self-regulatory processes play an important role in enabling students to resist these cognitive tendencies and engage in deliberate evaluation (Liu, 2026;Zhao & Jin, 2026).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Zhao, Y., & Jin, H.
Affiliations
Macao Polytechnic University (MO)
Corresponding author
Jin, Huiyi
Venue
Learning and Motivation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-08
Volume
95
Pages
102299
ISSN
0023-9690 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7165453461
Cited by
4
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
80.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Learning and Motivation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
student self-regulation, AI-assisted language learning, self-determination theory, critical thinking disposition, teacher support, flow, learner autonomy, mediation, undergraduate students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review