Business model design: An activity system perspective
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies that relate BMI to firm performance mainly focus on specific design choices rather than the process of developing a BM.
“Studies that do relate BMI to firm performance mainly focus on the implications of specific design choices in BMs (e.g., Zott & Amit, 2010) rather than on the process of developing a BM.”
From Digitalization, business models, and SMEs: How do business model innovation practices improve performance of digitalizing SMEs? (2019) · cites this paper as Zott & Amit, 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 3,164
- Authors
- Zott, C., & Amit, R.
- Venue
- Long Range Planning
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 216-226
- ISSN
- 0024-6301 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2166737518
- Cited by
- 3,164
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 188 · 2025: 213 · 2024: 239 · 2023: 245 · 2022: 234 · 2021: 249 · 2020: 272 · 2019: 276 · 2018: 237 · 2017: 255 · 2016: 178 · 2015: 173 · 2014: 145 · 2013: 121 · 2012: 74
- FWCI
- 132.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Long Range Planning (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
- Keywords
- business model design, activity systems, inter-organizational collaboration, value creation, value appropriation, lock-in, complementarity, novelty, governance, design elements, design themes, business model architecture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
