Cited by 25Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Research Studies

EGFR mutations and clinical outcomes of chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

Zhang, Qiong, Dai, Hong-Hai, Dong, Hong-Yun, Sun, Cheng-Tao, Yang, Zhe, Han, Jun-Qing·2014·Lung Cancer

Abstract

Background This meta-analysis was performed to assess whether epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status was associated with objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with chemotherapy.Method We systematically identified eligible articles investigating the effects of chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC stratified by EGFR mutation status. The summary risk ratio (RR) for ORR and hazard ratios (HRs) for both PFS and OS were calculated using the inverse variance formula of meta-analysis.Results Identification for the current meta-analysis: 5 prospective studies (n=875) and 18 retrospective studies (n=1934) for ORR; 2 prospective studies (n=434) and 10 retrospective studies (n=947) for PFS; 2 prospective studies (n=438) and 7 retrospective studies (n=711) for OS. The ORR was significantly higher in patients with EGFR mutations in prospective studies (RR=1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.74; P=0.001), but not in retrospective studies (RR=1.12; 95% CI, 0.96-1.32; P=0.146). There was no obvious association between EGFR mutations and PFS both in prospective (HR=0.84; 95% CI: 0.65-1.09; P=0.197) and retrospective (HR=1.02; 95% CI: 0.87-1.18; P=0.838) studies. Association between EGFR mutations and OS was also not seen in prospective studies (HR=0.74; 95% CI: 0.27-2.05; P=0.566), but was seen in retrospective studies (HR=0.48; 95% CI: 0.33-0.72; P<0.001; I(2)=75.9%; P<0.001) with significant heterogeneity.Conclusion EGFR mutations in advanced NSCLC may be associated with higher ORRs to chemotherapy, but may have nothing to do with PFS and OS. Further prospective studies are required to identify the influence of EGFR mutations on chemotherapy effects in advanced NSCLC.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.06.011

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Q., Dai, H.-H., Dong, H.-Y., Sun, C.-T., Yang, Z., & Han, J.-Q.
Affiliations
Shandong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yang, Zhe
Venue
Lung Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
85
Issue
3
Pages
339-345
ISSN
0169-5002 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057942347
Cited by
25
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lung Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
EGFR mutation, non-small cell lung cancer, advanced non-small cell lung cancer, chemotherapy response, objective response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, predictive biomarkers, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, EGFR inhibitor resistance
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Mutation, Neoplasm Staging, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Publication Bias, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review