Cited by 18Enzyme Production and CharacterizationEnzyme Catalysis and ImmobilizationPeptidase Inhibition and Analysis

Peptidase from Aspergillus niger NRRL 3: Optimization of its production by solid-state fermentation, purification and characterization

Open access
López, Débora N., Galante, Micaela, Ruggieri, Germán, Piaruchi, Julia, Dib, María E., Duran, Natalia Montellano, Lombardi, Julia, de Sanctis, Mariana +3 more·2018·LWT

Abstract

Orange peels, soybean hulls, Ilex paraguariensis and Platanus x hispanica were evaluated as solid substrates in order to produce peptidases from Aspergillus niger NRRL3 (PAN) under solid-state fermentation. The mixture of soybean hulls and orange peels enabled fungal development and showed the highest peptidase production. The optimal conditions for PAN production were found to be as follows: soybean hulls/orange peels mass ratio, 0.25; initial pH, 7.05; K₂HPO₄ 43.5 g/L and 4.03 g/L NaNO₃; inoculation with 5000 conidia per 3 g of solid substrate; incubation conditions, 30 °C for 5 days. Under these conditions, the peptidase activity was 1000 ± 100 AU/mL. PAN concentration was performed by adsorption on a DEAE-cellulose matrix. The subsequent purification was carried out by gel filtration on Sephadex G-100, with a global purification factor of about 9. PAN proved to belong to the serine-type of peptidases, its highest peptidase activity being at 65 °C. However, proteolysis at 60 °C proved more suitable due to the differences in the inactivation rate. Besides, PAN showed high stability over a pH range of 4–11. Taking all this into account, we herein describe the production and purification of a serine peptidase from Aspergillus niger NRRL3 for the first time.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.09.013

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The milk-clotting activity of the Aspergillus niger enzyme was retained in the temperature range of 30°C to 75°C at a level of at least 40%.

    “The MCA of this enzyme was retained in the temperature range of 30°C to 75°C at a level of at least 40%.”

    From Invited review: Milk-clotting enzymes of microbial origin and their role in cheesemaking-A review. (2025) · cites this paper as López et al., 2018

    Section 3.5 reports that the Aspergillus niger peptidase retained at least 40% activity from 30°C to 75°C. But Section 2.8 says temperature-dependent activity was measured by casein hydrolysis; the paper does not establish that milk-clotting activity (MCA) was retained at that level. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The optimum temperature of the enzyme produced by Aspergillus niger assessed by López et al. (2018) was 65°C.

    “The optimum temperature of the enzyme produced by A. niger assessed in the study by López et al. (2018), was 65°C.”
  • The high temperature required for milk coagulation by Bacillus spp. P7 MCE may have contributed to the reduced firmness and fracture force of the resulting gels compared with the rennet gels obtained at 35°C.

    “The high temperature required for milk coagulation by Bacillus spp.P7 MCE may have contributed to the reduced firmness and fracture force of the resulting gels compared with the rennet gels obtained at 35°C.”

    From Invited review: Milk-clotting enzymes of microbial origin and their role in cheesemaking-A review. (2025) · cites this paper as López et al., 2018

    Section 3.5 characterizes the temperature-dependent activity of a peptidase from Aspergillus niger, not milk coagulation by Bacillus P7. Searches for Bacillus P7, milk coagulation, gel firmness, fracture force, and rennet found no passage addressing the claimed comparison. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Amazonian Bacillus spp. P7 can be used as a milk coagulant.

    “López et al. (2018) showed that Amazonian Bacillus spp.P7 can be used as a milk coagulant, although the resulting milk gels exhibited slightly lower firmness and fracture force than those induced by rennet.”

    From Invited review: Milk-clotting enzymes of microbial origin and their role in cheesemaking-A review. (2025) · cites this paper as López et al., 2018

    The Materials section (page unavailable) identifies the study organism as Aspergillus niger NRRL3, not Amazonian Bacillus spp. P7. Searches for Bacillus P7, milk coagulation, and rennet found no passage in our copy addressing P7’s use as a milk coagulant; a reference to a milk-clotting enzyme concerns Aspergillus niger. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Milk gels produced with Amazonian Bacillus spp. P7 MCE exhibited slightly lower firmness and fracture force than those induced by rennet.

    “López et al. (2018) showed that Amazonian Bacillus spp.P7 can be used as a milk coagulant, although the resulting milk gels exhibited slightly lower firmness and fracture force than those induced by rennet.”

    From Invited review: Milk-clotting enzymes of microbial origin and their role in cheesemaking-A review. (2025) · cites this paper as López et al., 2018

    The Materials section identifies the organism studied as Aspergillus niger NRRL 3, not Amazonian Bacillus spp. P7. Searches for Bacillus P7, milk gels, firmness, fracture force, and rennet found no passage reporting the claimed comparison; the copy is not marked as truncated. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 18

Authors
López, D. N., Galante, M., Ruggieri, G., Piaruchi, J., Dib, M. E., Duran, N. M., Lombardi, J., de Sanctis, M., Boeris, V., Risso, P. H., & Spelzini, D.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • National University of Rosario (AR)
Corresponding author
Spelzini, Darío
Venue
LWT
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
98
Pages
485-491
ISSN
0023-6438 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2891547563
Cited by
18
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • LWT (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Conicet (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • Universidad Nacional de Rosario (1BIO585)
  • Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2017-0937)
  • Secretaría de Políticas Universitarias (VT12-UNR4183)
  • Universidad Católica Argentina and Fundación Nuevo Banco de Santa Fe
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Enzyme Production and Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
Keywords
Aspergillus niger, serine protease, solid-state fermentation, enzyme production optimization, orange peel, soybean hulls, agro-industrial substrates, enzyme purification, DEAE-cellulose adsorption, size exclusion chromatography, thermal stability, pH stability, proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review