Cited by 72

Ultrasound-assisted enzymatic digestion for efficient extraction of proteins from quinoa

Yang, Chao, Liu, Wenyu, Zhu, Xijin, Zhang, Xuejian, Wei, Yuming, Huang, Jie, Yang, Farong, Yang, Fumin·2024·LWT

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the potential synergistic impact of ultrasound and enzyme on the extraction of quinoa protein, to enhance its extraction yield and modify its functional properties. The highest protein extraction rate (26.72 %) was achieved under the following conditions: power, 400 W; time, 210 min; pH, 10.0; temperature, 50 °C; and amount of alkaline proteinase, 1.668 kat. The ultrasound process, due to its elevated shear, mechanical energy, and cavitation, enhanced the solubility of the substrate, rendering it more easily accessible to the enzyme. Consequently, this acceleration of the chemical reaction resulted in an improved protein yield. The optimized conditions of ultrasound-assisted enzymatic treatment effectively induced alterations in the structure of quinoa protein. The findings from the analysis of surface hydrophobicity, particle sizes, sulfhydryl content, fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy collectively demonstrated the unfolding of protein molecules and the exposure of hydrophobic and sulfhydryl groups following treatment. Additionally, compared to single ultrasound and non-ultrasound procedures, the protein produced by this process had higher solubility (86.40 %), higher emulsifying activity (100.44 m2/g), better foaming capacity (122.45 %), superior water/oil-binding capacity. Hence, the ultrasound-assisted enzymatic method exhibits potential as a suitable technique for enhancing b…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lwt.2024.115784

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • pH-shift combined with heat or ultrasound, high-pressure homogenization, and ultrasound-assisted enzymatic routes commonly reduce the mean particle size to 0.15-0.5 μm and narrow the size distribution.

    “However, pH-shift combined with heat or ultrasound, high-pressure homogenization, and ultrasound-assisted enzymatic routes commonly reduce the mean particle size to 0.15-0.5 μ m and narrow the size distribution”
  • Specific routes such as pH-shift combined with heating or ultrasound, HPH and ultrasound-assisted enzymatic extraction often reduce floc size from 0.8-1.2 μm to 0.15-0.5 μm.

    “By contrast, specific routes such as pH-shift combined with heating or ultrasound, HPH and ultrasound-assisted enzymatic extraction often reduce floc size from 0.8-1.2 μ m to 0.15-0.5 μ m.”

Authors
Yang, C., Liu, W., Zhu, X., Zhang, X., Wei, Y., Huang, J., Yang, F., & Yang, F.
Venue
LWT
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-02
Volume
194
Pages
115784
ISSN
0023-6438
Cited by
72
References
0
Language
en
Funders
Gansu Province Science and Technology Department

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review