Cited by 38Wildlife-Road Interactions and ConservationWildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Does human infrastructure shape scent marking in a solitary felid?

Open access
Krofel, Miha, Hočevar, Lan, Allen, Maximilian L.·2017·Mammalian Biology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mambio.2017.05.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krofel, M., Hočevar, L., & Allen, M. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Ljubljana (SI)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Krofel, Miha
Venue
Mammalian Biology
Published
2017-11
Volume
87
Pages
36-39
ISSN
1616-5047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2614578847
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mammalian Biology (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
scent marking, Lynx lynx, road infrastructure, habitat modification, chemical communication, territoriality, snow tracking, sex differences, anthropogenic landscapes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review