Cited by 7Environmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyAquaculture disease management and microbiotaMarine and fisheries research

Introduction to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) PREDICT 2 Tamar Estuary Research Workshop: Pathological risk evaluation using “health status-related” biomarkers

Shaw, Jennifer P., Moore, Michael N.·2011·Marine Environmental Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.marenvres.2011.05.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaw, J. P., & Moore, M. N.
Affiliations
Plymouth Marine Laboratory (GB)
Corresponding author
Shaw, Jennifer P.
Venue
Marine Environmental Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
72
Issue
1-2
Pages
1-2
ISSN
0141-1136 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049365429
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Marine Environmental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
Tamar Estuary, marine ecosystem health, estuarine monitoring
MeSH terms
Animals, England, Environmental Monitoring, Fishes, Human Activities, Invertebrates, Oceans and Seas, Public Policy, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Biomarkers, Ecosystem, Rivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review