Cited by 106Marine and fisheries researchFish Ecology and Management StudiesIchthyology and Marine Biology

Tuna longline catch rates in the Indian Ocean: did industrial fishing result in a 90% rapid decline in the abundance of large predatory species?

Polacheck, Tom·2006·Marine Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.marpol.2005.06.016

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fishery data have been criticised for inducing biased conclusions about stock abundance trends because CPUE series may not accurately reflect trends of population abundance due to changes in fishing practice, efficiency of fleets or environmental effects on catchability.

    “Fishery data have been criticised for inducing biased conclusions about stock abundance trends because CPUE series may not accurately reflect trends of population abundance due to changes in fishing practice, efficiency of the fleets or environmental effects on catchability, among others (see Maunder and Punt, 2004;Maunder et al., 2006;Polacheck, 2006).”

    From Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna (2015) · cites this paper as Polacheck, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Polacheck, T.
Corresponding author
Polacheck, Tom
Venue
Marine Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-09
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
470-482
ISSN
0308-597X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028276073
Cited by
106
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
10.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Marine Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Keywords
tuna longline fishing, catch rates, billfish, Indian Ocean fisheries, sustainable fisheries, fisheries management policy, marine reserves, peer review, scientific controversy, media coverage of science, fish stock status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review