Step zero for fisheries co-management: What precedes implementation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The precursor to each case-study was environmental perturbation followed by a need for innovative approaches to understand and manage the aquatic environment.
“As common in co-management schemes (Chuenpagdee & Jentoft, 2007), the precursor to each case-study was environmental perturbation followed by a need for innovative approaches to understand and manage the aquatic environment”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Chuenpagdee & Jentoft, 2007
Cites
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
“Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management
Reid, A. J., Eckert, L. E., Lane, J., Young, N., Hinch, S. G., Darimont, C. T., Cooke, S. J., Ban, N. C., & Marshall, A. (2021) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12516 · Cited by 652 · see citing works
“As common in co-management schemes (Chuenpagdee & Jentoft, 2007), the precursor to each case-study was environmental perturbation followed by a need for innovative approaches to understand and manage the aquatic environment—are we then to wait for the global disruption of all fisheries, large and…”
BackgroundCastello, L., Viana, J. P., Watkins, G., Pinedo-Vasquez, M., & Luzadis, V. A. (2009) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9220-5 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
A framework for monitoring social process and outcomes in environmental programs
Chapman, S. (2014) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.07.004 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chuenpagdee, R., & Jentoft, S.
- Affiliations
- Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
- UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Chuenpagdee, Ratana
- Venue
- Marine Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 657-668
- ISSN
- 0308-597X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076239987
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 38.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Marine Policy (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal Management and Development
- Keywords
- fisheries co-management, stakeholder engagement, community-based natural resource management, local entrepreneurs, environmental organizations, success factors, fisheries governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
