Cited by 132Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisOccupational and environmental lung diseasesPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments

Biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Drakopanagiotakis, F., Wujak, Lukasz, Wygrecka, Malgorzata, Markart, P.·2018·Matrix Biology

Abstract

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, debilitating, fibrotic lung disease leading to respiratory failure and ultimately to death. Being the prototype of interstitial lung diseases, IPF is characterized by marked heterogeneity regarding its clinical course. Despite significant progress in the understanding of its pathogenesis, we still cannot reliably predict the course of the disease and the response to treatment of an individual patient. Non-invasive biomarkers, in particular serum biomarkers, for the (early) diagnosis, differential diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of therapeutic response are urgently needed. Numerous molecules involved in alveolar epithelial cell injury, fibroproliferation and matrix remodeling as well as immune regulation have been proposed as potential biomarkers. Furthermore, genetic variants of TOLLIP, MUC5B, and other genes are associated with a differential response to treatment and with the development and/or the prognosis of IPF. Additionally, the bacterial signature in IPF lungs, as shown from microbiome analyses, as well as mitochondrial DNA seem to have promising roles as biomarkers. Moreover, combination of multiple biomarkers may identify comprehensive biomarker signatures in IPF patients. However, there is still a long way until these potential biomarkers complete or substitute for the clinical and functional parameters currently available for IPF.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.matbio.2018.01.023

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the context of IPF, biomarkers can be classified based on their association with alveolar epithelial dysfunction, ECM remodelling and fibroproliferation, and immune dysfunction.

    “In the context of IPF, biomarkers can be classified based on their association with alveolar epithelial dysfunction (such as Krebs von den Lungen-6, surfactant proteins and mucin-5B), ECM remodelling and fibroproliferation (including MMPs, lysyl oxidase-like proteins, periostin and OPN) and immune dysfunction (such as CC motif chemokine ligand-18 and YKL-40) (Drakopanagiotakis et al., 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Drakopanagiotakis, F., Wujak, L., Wygrecka, M., & Markart, P.
Affiliations
  • Klinikum Fulda (DE)
  • Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (DE)
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
Corresponding author
Markart, P.
Venue
Matrix Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
68-69
Pages
404-421
ISSN
0945-053X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790507111
Cited by
132
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Matrix Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Occupational and environmental lung diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Keywords
idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, biomarkers, serum biomarkers, interstitial lung disease, disease prognosis, treatment response prediction, Tollip, MUC5B, genetic variants, lung microbiome, mitochondrial DNA, alveolar epithelial cell injury, extracellular matrix remodeling, biomarker signatures
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Diagnosis, Differential, DNA, Mitochondrial, Humans, Prognosis, Biomarkers, Disease Progression, Early Diagnosis, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, Mucin-5B

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review